Jump to content

EU must develop 'appetite for power', Borrell says


webfact

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, vogie said:

It would appear that the EUs chickens are coming home to roost.

 

The UK’s withdrawal from the European Union has left a huge €75bn (£62bn) hole in the bloc’s budget for the next seven years, 2021 to 2027. “And now we are fighting like ferrets in a sack,” said one EU diplomat with a sigh.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/16/stressed-heads-to-start-brussels-budget-talks-post-brexit

Think of the money they are going to get from tariffs.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, JonnyF said:

The EU's appetite for power is already causing many issues and will contribute to it's demise.

 

It's supposed to be a trading bloc. Leave it that way.

The EEC was founded as a trading bloc, but at the treaty of Lisbon migrated in a much more concentrated Union, ratifiid by the UK parliament 

11 March 2008 House of Commons 346 206   16 July 2008 [76]
18 June 2008 House of Lords Passed [77][78]
19 June 2008 Royal Assent Granted
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, vogie said:

It would appear that the EUs chickens are coming home to roost.

 

The UK’s withdrawal from the European Union has left a huge €75bn (£62bn) hole in the bloc’s budget for the next seven years, 2021 to 2027. “And now we are fighting like ferrets in a sack,” said one EU diplomat with a sigh.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/16/stressed-heads-to-start-brussels-budget-talks-post-brexit

This "huge" gap will quickly be filled by import duty over the UK goeodss into the EU.

For the rest: the EU plans a LOT more activities as in the past, for instance a much tighter border control ( in the Mediterranen) .

For me even no problem if also all medicine developments will be contracted under EU supervidion and done buy the EU Universities. Also very quick lower in costs as what is paid now to the pharma co's 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Andrew65 said:

How is it just a trading bloc when it has a currency, a central bank, a national anthem, and a government & civil service?

The EU does NOT have a government. Read EU Council, EU Commission and EU Parliament.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, puipuitom said:

Never so many people were forced in one empire as under the British. Far more as the Nazi's ever could think of. Concentration camps were invented by the British to beak the Boers in South Africa and later the Philippino's by the USA. 

Yes  always the Bad bits never the good bits

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, puipuitom said:

This "huge" gap will quickly be filled by import duty over the UK goeodss into the EU.

For the rest: the EU plans a LOT more activities as in the past, for instance a much tighter border control ( in the Mediterranen) .

For me even no problem if also all medicine developments will be contracted under EU supervidion and done buy the EU Universities. Also very quick lower in costs as what is paid now to the pharma co's 

Maybe the French could sell crepe suzettes to returning British holidaymakers in Calais to bridge the shortfall.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, JAG said:

Well we have been there before, panned out OK in the end. Mind you we didn't have to worry about the Belgian Special Forces then!

 

There again, as the old joke has it: the difference between the Belgian Army and a slice of toast - you can make soldiers out of a slice of toast!

It's the EU forces collected to Scotland and Ireland, England needs to be worried of. 

 

I wonder who gets to keep the Trident, once UK splits?

 

From the history we have already learned, no nation should give up their nukes. Aka Russian occupation of Crimea, when USA, Russia and Europe guaranteed Ukraine's security when Ukraine gave up their nukes.  

Edited by TheDark
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, puipuitom said:

This "huge" gap will quickly be filled by import duty over the UK goeodss into the EU.

It doesn't work like that. Tariffs are designed to limit imports from outside. If fewer UK goods are imported, then import duties will be minimal. Simple economics. 

 

And furthermore, if the UK agrees an FTA with the EU, where will your import duties come from then? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, JAG said:

the difference between the Belgian Army and a slice of toast - you can make soldiers out of a slice of toast!

Never understood the need of us Belgians to have an army. 

We have military who speak French who don't undestand Flemish orders, and vice-versa. 

What a waste of funds. 

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, puipuitom said:

The EEC was founded as a trading bloc, but at the treaty of Lisbon migrated in a much more concentrated Union, ratifiid by the UK parliament 

11 March 2008 House of Commons 346 206   16 July 2008 [76]
18 June 2008 House of Lords Passed [77][78]
19 June 2008 Royal Assent Granted

Perhaps we should have had the referendum then and saved another 12 years of time?

Edited by nauseus
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, puipuitom said:

This "huge" gap will quickly be filled by import duty over the UK goeodss into the EU.

For the rest: the EU plans a LOT more activities as in the past, for instance a much tighter border control ( in the Mediterranen) .

For me even no problem if also all medicine developments will be contracted under EU supervidion and done buy the EU Universities. Also very quick lower in costs as what is paid now to the pharma co's 

No import duties on the far larger of EU goods into the UK then? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, nauseus said:

No import duties on the far larger of EU goods into the UK then? 

Which naturally means that EU can keep all the moneys and export freely to the UK, while UK producers have to lower their product prices to be able to compete with EU markets. 

 

Sounds like a good deal for the EU. Doesn't it?

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Perhaps we should have had the referendum then and saved another 12 years of time?

EU treaties HAVE to be passed by every member state. That's why when countries like Ireland vote no, they're made to vote again until they give the CORRECT answer. Nothing can stand in the way of the grand-project.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Andrew65 said:

EU treaties HAVE to be passed by every member state. That's why when countries like Ireland vote no, they're made to vote again until they give the CORRECT answer. Nothing can stand in the way of the grand-project.

It was a sarcastic comment. Rare for me of course.

 

Well we didn't lay down in front of the EU GP either.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...