Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Pareena confident she's not guilty in defamation case

Recommended Posts

Pareena confident she's not guilty in defamation case

By THE NATION

 

800_6ef3d1e9bb0ecaf.jpg?v=1581924264

 

Phalang Pracharath Party Ratchaburi MP Pareena Kraikup reported to the Criminal Court today (February 17) to give testimony in a defamation case brought by Future Forward party-list MP and spokeswoman Pannika Wanich.

 

Pareena had claimed in a Facebook post that Future Forward leader Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit and Pannika were allegedly involved in bomb incidents in several areas of Bangkok and the unrest in three southern provinces, prompting Pannika to sue her for defamation under Sections 326 and 328 of the Criminal Law.

 

After reporting to the court today, Pareena told the press she was “100 per cent confident that she was not guilty and would neither seek reconciliation nor any settlement”.

 

She added that she would hold a press conference at Phalang Pracharath Party headquarters tomorrow.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30382273

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-02-17

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

We don’t need a court ruling to pass judgement on her. Just look at the facts.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, webfact said:

Pareena told the press she was “100 per cent confident that she was not guilty

She was spreading fake news .

Isn't there a law and punishment against this ?

I do not believe anybody saying " 100% sure " .

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, rkidlad said:

My god this woman is completely vulgar. Proper trash. Sad to think that she's supposed to be representing and helping members of the public. 

Not to forget her role on the anti-corruption body!

 

 

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If it is clear and the evidence unretractable that she did indeed post something as the sort, she will be found guilty and then put on a suspended 2 year sentence not going to jail. I find her to be cute. If I wasn't married I would like to play with her.

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This lady appears to have quite a long neck for a lady🤔

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 hours ago, BobBKK said:

She is a very, very nasty piece of work

I've seen worse in some 'red light districts' in Thailand.  :smile:

 

800_6ef3d1e9bb0ecaf.jpg?v=1581924264

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Misterwhisper said:

Isn't that the very same high-standing member of society who not so long ago claimed she was “100 per cent confident that she was not guilty" regarding her by now judicially confirmed illegal encroachment on national forest land for her chicken farm?

 

My, my, some people are truly brimming with "100% confidence", it almost borders on a miracle.

'100% confident' means;- "I have paid the requested brown envelope consultancy fee and had confirmation of my innocence". 555 😷😷😷😷

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
52 minutes ago, holy cow cm said:

If it is clear and the evidence unretractable that she did indeed post something as the sort, she will be found guilty and then put on a suspended 2 year sentence not going to jail. I find her to be cute. If I wasn't married I would like to play with her.

So you up for a game of Tik Tak Toe or Snakes & Ladders?  Me, I'd be doing things to her that would shock my dear old granny......but then again......granny had 9 kids so my assumption about Dear old granny maybe based more on fantasy than fact! 

Edited by Grumpy John
Smeling
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...