Traubert Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 9 hours ago, Fex Bluse said: China spent nearly 2 months trying to cover up the virus. Only when it was impossible to cover up did they start instituting measures. China is the cause of this. Three weeks actually but whats 40 days between friends? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assurancetourix Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 The scientific community has so far estimated that the maximum incubation period for covid-19 is 14 days. But A Chinese septuagenarian from Hubei contracted coronarivus that appeared at the end of last year in this province of China but did not develop the symptoms until 27 days later, local authorities announced on Saturday 22 February. A longer incubation, during which an individual carrying the virus can be contaminating without being aware of it, could complicate efforts to contain the spread of the epidemic which has so far claimed more than 2,300 lives in China and foreign. According to the Hubei provincial government, the 70-year-old man was in contact with his sick sister on January 24. He had a fever on February 20 and the virus was detected in his body the following day. There is therefore a good chance that the 14-day quarantine will therefore be considered insufficient 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Traubert Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, Assurancetourix said: There is therefore a good chance that the 14-day quarantine will therefore be considered insufficient Not by anybody in the scientific world. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assurancetourix Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 4 minutes ago, Traubert said: Not by anybody in the scientific world. So I guess the "scientific world" is stronger than the Covid-19? Explain to me what is currently happening in Italy ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukrules Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 7 minutes ago, Assurancetourix said: According to the Hubei provincial government, the 70-year-old man was in contact with his sick sister on January 24. He had a fever on February 20 and the virus was detected in his body the following day. There is therefore a good chance that the 14-day quarantine will therefore be considered insufficient Being in Hubei I would not be surprised if he didn't catch it from his sister but from someone else more recently. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eindhoven Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 (edited) On 2/19/2020 at 12:34 PM, Yinn said: Jingthing, no need panic. you lucky you live in thailand. We prepared and nobody die in Thailand from corona. Sorry, but your statement is totally false. When I arrived at the airport, there were no precautions taken. Everyone, including the Chinese flights arriving, were having to place their fingers on an unclean fingerprint scanner. No cleansing was noted whilst I was there. This during the period when the virus was known worldwide. Many passengers in the queue wore masks. So what preparation was in place? In fact, they were simply helping to spread it with the use of uncleaned fingerprint scanners. You clearly do not have a clue and are happy to believe any rubbish that is printed, that supports your blinkered viewpoint. Annoying when people try to spread propaganda, either ignorantly or deliberately. Edited February 23, 2020 by Eindhoven 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cake Monster Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 On 2/19/2020 at 8:21 PM, Dumbastheycome said: Yes, I do understand the potential for transmission. What I am trying to refer to is that it is little different in outcome to other existing viral infections in terms of transmission and morbidity. Why is it that MERS is now publiclly ignored to the point of irrelevance? It is still out there! Morbidity rate horrendus! Is there any proposal to ban movement of people from incident localities? There need be some better consideration of the possible politerization of what is ongoing re' Covid19 ! Yes ! MERS is still out there, with its horrendous mortality rate. One of the main fears over this Covid19 Virus, is that it will mutate into something more sinister than it is at the moment. Although that is not to say that it is not already sinister .... it is. Infections are now popping up within people that have no prior contact with China, Wuhan, or have not traveled from their homes, and there appears to be a longer incubation period than the first published 14 days. That makes this thing very scary indeed 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assurancetourix Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 17 minutes ago, ukrules said: Being in Hubei I would not be surprised if he didn't catch it from his sister but from someone else more recently. It would surprise me that the Chinese authorities wanted to shoot themselves by revealing this. To reveal to the whole world that the silent contamination of Covid-19 can be more than 14 days seems to me a gesture or a word of common sense even if it can hurt some ego. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanemax Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 17 minutes ago, Eindhoven said: Sorry, but your statement is totally false. When I arrived at the airport, there were no precautions taken. Everyone, including the Chinese flights arriving, were having to place their fingers on an unclean fingerprint scanner. No cleansing was noted whilst I was there. This during the period when the virus was known worldwide. Many passengers in the queue wore masks. So what preparation was in place? In fact, they were simply helping to spread it with the use of uncleaned fingerprint scanners. You clearly do not have a clue and are happy to believe any rubbish that is printed, that supports your blinkered viewpoint. Annoying when people try to spread propaganda, either ignorantly or deliberately. I recently arrived on a Air China flight from Peking and we were all required to disinfect our hands and get tested for a fever upon arrival Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Assurancetourix Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 17 minutes ago, Eindhoven said: You clearly do not have a clue and are happy to believe any rubbish that is printed, that supports your blinkered viewpoint. She is a kid who has no knowledge of the world around us. She lives on her little pink cloud; she was formatted from a very young age to believe only what the elders or those who are of a caste superior to her say. She is unable to weigh the pros and cons 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tifino Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 saying there are No Hidden cases... is like that U.S. pollie that had to drink a glass of what was supposedly no longer polluted water Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eindhoven Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 (edited) 8 minutes ago, sanemax said: I recently arrived on a Air China flight from Peking and we were all required to disinfect our hands and get tested for a fever upon arrival I am writing about mid Jan.... What happens now is long after the horse has bolted. Edited February 23, 2020 by Eindhoven Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sanemax Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 Just now, Eindhoven said: I am writing about mid Jan.... What happens now is way after the horse has bolted. I was talking about late January Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rabas Posted February 23, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 23, 2020 (edited) On 2/19/2020 at 8:21 PM, Dumbastheycome said: Yes, I do understand the potential for transmission. What I am trying to refer to is that it is little different in outcome to other existing viral infections in terms of transmission and morbidity. Why is it that MERS is now publiclly ignored to the point of irrelevance? It is still out there! Morbidity rate horrendus! Is there any proposal to ban movement of people from incident localities? There need be some better consideration of the possible politerization of what is ongoing re' Covid19 ! -- MERS can barely transmit H2H, many get it from camels, thus numbers are very low. -- SARS spreads easily but only long after symptoms appear thus it's relatively easy to stop. -- NCOV is a nightmare, super stealth, H2H during long variable incubation, hard to test for reliably, and now cases of reinfection after recovery. Case fatality rates are not that low (just hard to measure while new cases are increasing) and some young people are dying. Another Wuhan doctor died yesterday, she was 29. Edited February 23, 2020 by rabas 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rabas Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 (edited) 2 hours ago, Traubert said: Three weeks actually but whats 40 days between friends? Patient zero was diagnosed Dec 1, 2019 so 31 days till first peep. Later, lots of cover up like no sign of human to human, must be just animals. In truth, patient zero was never at the Wuhan market, so still no information on where it came from. International experts should have been on the scene early December. Even now the CCP is still preventing anyone from inspecting critical areas = full blown cover up. Edited February 23, 2020 by rabas 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eindhoven Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 1 hour ago, sanemax said: I was talking about late January That's still up to two weeks and we don't know which flights were screened and how effectively. Even one day without everyone sanitising their hands prior to scanning and/or cleaning the scanners was too much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutyfirst Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 10 hours ago, christophe75 said: Fair enough. But why we do not apply basic common sense with the documented cases we already have on our hands ? There was tropical heat and humidity inside the conference hall of the Hyatt Hotel in Singapore where a dozen of people got infected ? And inside the "hell" cruise ship in Japan... they had a "desert" climate ? And what about the few... taxis were drivers where infected (Japan, Thailand...) ? Well, yes, I agree, sometimes it is really hot in taxis in Bangkok ???? I think promiscuity, density are very important factor too. Furthermore we all focus on "droplets", and airbone way... But what if... the virus spreads more by fecal/urine contacts ? AKA by touching ? Those 2 ways start to be studied in China. Like a family who share a.... meal (with pots) (Hong Kong).... like a buffet shared (boat, conference : you use the spoons in the buffet, or the barman pour you a glass, you take the glass, then you take some peanuts even with a spoon, many people before you used the same spoon etc.) In a taxi you exchange bills and coins. Sometime the driver gives you the "toolway receipt"... He touches your fingers... Or public and unisex toilets (airplane for instance.) For that matter, the thai motto "wash your hands" might be spot on. Anyway, with other germs and viruses we know hands are.... moving disaster ! I think you missing the point. Coronaviruses THRIVE in cold and dry conditions and the warmer and more humid the air the less effective it comes. The examples you gave are perfect examples of the type of ideal conditions the virus can be transmitted. So im not sure im following your points about the Hyatt, the cruise ship and an aircon taxi? Your essentially got people crammed into a space with the exact conditions that allow for the best transmission. This is also 1 factor to why the coronavirus has such a high infection rate inside hospitals. If we look at most of the cases and hotspots they are all currently in cold dry climates. So with any hope the hot muggy weather in SE Asia will help to control the spread and contain any spreads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mung Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 I've been trying to work out exactly what has happened here. It takes basic logic to question how over 80,000 tourists from Wuhan this year alone, and tens of thousands more from mainland China can arrive and not cause major infection issues. Professionals around the world have come out and have said the numbers don't add up, and that official in Phuket did say that they were under orders to restrict info to the public. But still, I did consider the whole 'hot humid climate' stance, but then Singapore has had a few outbreaks, albeit not that problematic at the moment. Then again Singapore is taking this very seriously. I also then took into account that a new virus can mutate to become more or less virulent, and assumed it could have become less contagious. But recent events in Italy, Korea and Iran suggest otherwise. So what's left? Either limited to no testing is being undertaken, numbers are not being told transparently, or Thailand has some magic luck potion running through their water supply. It just baffles me how so many possibly infected people from China can come here, and there isn't a mass infection situation yet. Thailand was one of the first, if not the First Nation outside of China to have cases if I recall, so what gives? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukrules Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Dutyfirst said: If we look at most of the cases and hotspots they are all currently in cold dry climates. So with any hope the hot muggy weather in SE Asia will help to control the spread and contain any spreads. That is the one hope, the WHO and other disease control specialists from various countries around the world will no doubt be running tests on virus samples in every temperature and humidity range that's applicable to their locations. They will have been doing these tests since they first got their hands on the samples and they probably have the results already. Why else were the likes of the UK government rushing to export patients from Wuhan when little was known, they wanted the samples. It's notable that they haven't been quite so forthcoming with expensive evacuation flights since they got the initial people out of Wuhan. Edited February 23, 2020 by ukrules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mung Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 1 hour ago, Dutyfirst said: I think you missing the point. Coronaviruses THRIVE in cold and dry conditions and the warmer and more humid the air the less effective it comes. The examples you gave are perfect examples of the type of ideal conditions the virus can be transmitted. So im not sure im following your points about the Hyatt, the cruise ship and an aircon taxi? Your essentially got people crammed into a space with the exact conditions that allow for the best transmission. This is also 1 factor to why the coronavirus has such a high infection rate inside hospitals. If we look at most of the cases and hotspots they are all currently in cold dry climates. So with any hope the hot muggy weather in SE Asia will help to control the spread and contain any spreads. The UK had it's first case on the 1st of February, which is now 22 days ago. As of now it only has 9 cases, and the weather has been cold as is expected in Winter. Singapore has had more cases and with a vastly smaller population. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGW Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, Mung said: Singapore has had more cases and with a vastly smaller population. The population in Singapore is condensed in very small areas, just like China, public areas in Singapore tend to be AC, all offices and the like certainly are AC, not sure if the air in large office blocks and shopping centres is recirculated? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dumbastheycome Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 1 hour ago, rabas said: -- MERS can barely transmit H2H, many get it from camels, thus numbers are very low. -- SARS spreads easily but only long after symptoms appear thus it's relatively easy to stop. -- NCOV is a nightmare, super stealth, H2H during long variable incubation, hard to test for reliably, and now cases of reinfection after recovery. Case fatality rates are not that low (just hard to measure while new cases are increasing) and some young people are dying. Another Wuhan doctor died yesterday, she was 29. Would be very interested in any link to confirmation of re infection ! I am/have not tried to minimize the significance of this new contagion rather than to refer to the relative mortality rate when compared to existing seasonal contagions. Yes, as with any such there is the risk of a mutation that changes that aspect. Putting that into the perspective of initial reaction to the variants of influenza which also present such mutative potential but for which effective or semi effective vaccination programs have alleviated the same will eventuate in response to Corvid-19 in probably about the same or similar time frame. And keeping that perspective in mind it need be acknowledged that to date even without any available vaccine it has not demonstrated a greater morbidity rate than conventional influenza despite vaccine availability for that. In real terms actually less than outside of China as to date which is most likely due to timely medical intervention because of public awareness and concern. It is also almost inevitable that deaths from influenza will be less for same related awareness and concerns. That some people who are outside the profile attributed to the majority of deaths may be attributable to factors such as fatigue ( over tired doctors) or multiple infection ( again doctors treating patients of viral infection). Is it the age or the circumstances of underlying health fitness that creates the anomaly ? If this new easily transmitted virus also demonstrated a morbidity factor similar to SARS or MERS I would suggest retreating to a bunker as I descended the steps of my own ! I and numerous others around me have already been a victim of a current influenza infection that was not pleasant and in many ways similar symptomatically to this CORVD-19 in that it targeted the lungs, preceded by strange fatigue and fleeting aches and pains without initial fever for at least 10 days.After onset of fever and some respritory distress for 4 days then 4 weeks to be free of a hacking spontaneous cough. I sought and was provided symptomatic relief for the cough. I live. I fit the profile of those who commonly succumb to influenza and apparently to CORVID -19. The fact is that in reality only practical self caution and avoidance of unnescesary placement of risk to limit exposure to infection is all that is possible. Or, as some might say. what does not kill you might make you stronger. Nature can be like that I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
christophe75 Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 1 hour ago, Dutyfirst said: I think you missing the point. Coronaviruses THRIVE in cold and dry conditions and the warmer and more humid the air the less effective it comes. The examples you gave are perfect examples of the type of ideal conditions the virus can be transmitted. Well you need to explain to us how an "in door" environment, with air conditioning (cold)... becomes "hot" during... summer season ? ???? For that matter, and that was precisely my point, the Hyatt Hotel in Singapore seems to be the perfect ground for a virus... all around the year.. whatever the season outside. Some people continue to believe that "hot" weather, out door, is the best protection. In the african savanna perhaps... But in a modern urban environment, where we have air con everywhere... it's less likely... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mung Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 22 minutes ago, CGW said: The population in Singapore is condensed in very small areas, just like China, public areas in Singapore tend to be AC, all offices and the like certainly are AC, not sure if the air in large office blocks and shopping centres is recirculated? So London isn't condensed, with the underground tube system, office blocks and close living quarters? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyScars Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 18 minutes ago, christophe75 said: Well you need to explain to us how an "in door" environment, with air conditioning (cold)... becomes "hot" during... summer season ? ???? For that matter, and that was precisely my point, the Hyatt Hotel in Singapore seems to be the perfect ground for a virus... all around the year.. whatever the season outside. Some people continue to believe that "hot" weather, out door, is the best protection. In the african savanna perhaps... But in a modern urban environment, where we have air con everywhere... it's less likely... I agree with Christophe75. The number just does not make sense at 35 in Thailand. I am saying way too low. I am begining to suspect that the British actor who was confirmed NOT infected probably had it. Of course I am speculating. https://www.thephuketnews.com/british-actor-confirmed-not-infected-with-wuhan-flu-74476.php 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukrules Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 (edited) 6 minutes ago, MikeyScars said: I agree with Christophe75. The number just does not make sense at 35 in Thailand. I am saying way too low. I am begining to suspect that the British actor who was confirmed NOT infected probably had it. Of course I am speculating. https://www.thephuketnews.com/british-actor-confirmed-not-infected-with-wuhan-flu-74476.php Did he since return to the UK - I can't see anything in the news about it? Edited February 23, 2020 by ukrules Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CGW Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 34 minutes ago, Mung said: So London isn't condensed, with the underground tube system, office blocks and close living quarters? True, wonder what causes the contagion then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayward1 Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 On 2/20/2020 at 12:46 PM, Sonhia said: What ever! Like.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dayward1 Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, CGW said: True, wonder what causes the contagion then? Hygiene. Soap NOT in the restrooms. Blowing the ole nose off in the sink area that everyone has to use to wash hands. Dirty, filthy people. White people are whom I'm referring to of course. Edited February 23, 2020 by dayward1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3NUMBAS Posted February 23, 2020 Share Posted February 23, 2020 thats what the italians thought ,now they have numerous towns in lockdown and no patient zero has been found and the streets are very quiet all over the north Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now