Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

Trump offered to pardon Assange if he cooperated over email leak, UK court hears

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

POTUS doing his ‘barely know him’ lies again. Dana Rohrabacher was hired by Trump together with Micheal Flynn to be his foreign policy advisers in 2017. 

Do you have any evidence/proof  of this ?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, sanemax said:

Do you have any evidence/proof  of this ?

If you can’t even know that fact which can be verified on public domain search, you shouldn’t be engaging in this conversation. By the way, he also said he arm wrestled Putin. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, sanemax said:

Thats not as logical way to come to a conclusion .

Like. if Assange said the World was flat and Trump said that it was round , Assange would be telling the truth and the World is flat ?

This isn't some school math problem. It's Trump who has a history of saying the world is flat and Assange saying it's a sphere. When testimony is evaluated in court, you don't think past performance  of witnesses in respect to truthfulness counts?  

  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, sanemax said:

Courts judge people on evidence in front of them on the case in issue  

Previous issues are not bought into the equation , otherwise if say there was a burglary , the Police would just arrest a person who has burled before and the Court would convict him without any evidence of him committing the crime 

Testimony is evidence. Prior perjury or dishonesty, for example, will definitely effect the value of testimony ,and it will be relevant and considered very much a part of any equation

 

regards your analogy... prior offenders would definitely be considered, (ergo the old cop thing of rounding up the usual suspects) but where you get the opinion that others would not, is a mystery.... or that because the offender has offended before, that he does not need to be found guilty of the new charges, but that this guilt is assumed... ridiculous... where do you see courts operate thus?

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, sanemax said:

That is quite important .

The Whitehouse denies this story and says this story isnt true 

Please explain? Why is this denial important? Get it on an affidavit and I might agree it’s relevant, but important... nah... the whitehouse deny everything and the fact checker has shown that the whitehouse lies at what should be seen by the sheeple, as an unbelievably unacceptable rate... yall must love the taste of it

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, sanemax said:

Do you have any evidence/proof  of this ?

You cannot be serious

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jany123 said:

Please explain? Why is this denial important? Get it on an affidavit and I might agree it’s relevant, but important... nah... the whitehouse deny everything and the fact checker has shown that the whitehouse lies at what should be seen by the sheeple, as an unbelievably unacceptable rate... yall must love the taste of it

 

Please explain why any of this story is important. The problem is Trump has so little credibility that his denial is unimportant. On the other side, his attackers have so little credibility that it is quite easy to believe they would fabricate information in order to disparage him.

 

When nobody is considered trustworthy, who cares what anyone says?

 

Why do you believe the story is true rather than false?  Do you have a sworn affidavit in front of a judge under penalty of perjury testifying the claim is 100% factually true and correct in every detail?  I don't believe either side is telling the truth.  There are likely small elements of truth on both sides, but both sides are also probably lying more than they are admitting.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...