Jump to content
BANGKOK
rooster59

Weinstein jury deadlocked on most serious sexual assault charges

Recommended Posts

Weinstein jury deadlocked on most serious sexual assault charges

By Brendan Pierson

 

2020-02-22T003638Z_4_LYNXMPEG1K1RL_RTROPTP_4_PEOPLE-HARVEY-WEINSTEIN.JPG

Film producer Harvey Weinstein arrives at New York Criminal Court for his sexual assault trial in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S., February 21, 2020. REUTERS/Jeenah Moon

 

(Reuters) - The jury in Harvey Weinstein's sexual assault trial in New York said on Friday they were deadlocked on the most serious criminal charges and suggested they were unanimous on the others levelled against the former Hollywood mogul.

 

Some legal experts said the jury's questions made it appear the seven men and five women were nearing a guilty verdict on at least one of the five counts against the producer of movies including "The English Patient" and "Shakespeare in Love".

 

A source within Weinstein's defence team said speculation about the verdict would be "premature and a mistake".

 

The jurors asked Justice James Burke on Friday afternoon whether they could be hung on the two counts of predatory sexual assault and unanimous on the other three, which include first-degree rape.

 

Conviction on the predatory assault charges, which carry a potential life sentence, would indicate that Weinstein is a repeat sexual offender. Two of the other charges carry prison terms of up to 25 years, while the third is up to 4 years.

 

Three legal experts, including Gerald Lefcourt, a criminal defence attorney who is not involved in the case, told Reuters that from their question to the judge it seemed the jurors were willing to convict Weinstein on the less serious counts.

 

Burke told them it is common for juries to have difficulty reaching a unanimous verdict, but that most are eventually able to do so.

 

"Please resume your deliberations," he said.

 

The jury later broke for the weekend and is expected to continue deliberating on Monday.

 

Asked outside the court in Manhattan what he thought the verdict would be, Weinstein, 67, shrugged and said he remained confident.

 

Donna Rotunno, his lead lawyer, has said the defence would be willing to accept a partial verdict, meaning the judge would accept the jury's decision on some counts and tell them to keep deliberating on the others. The prosecution has said it would not.

 

Weinstein has been charged with raping Jessica Mann, a onetime aspiring actress, and sexually assaulting former production assistant Mimi Haleyi. He denies the charges.

 

Annabella Sciorra, best known for her role in HBO's "The Sopranos," testified that Weinstein came to her New York apartment one winter night in 1993 or 1994, raped her and then forced oral sex on her.

 

That accusation is too old to be charged as a separate crime, but was introduced by prosecutors as an aggravating factor for the charges of predatory sexual assault on which the jury suggested it may be deadlocked.

 

Jurors can convict Weinstein of predatory sexual assault if they find that he committed the assault against Sciorra and at least one of the alleged crimes against Haleyi or Mann.

 

Defence lawyer Michael Bachner, who is not involved in the case, said it seemed the jury had convicted Weinstein on the counts related to the individual complainants.

 

"Otherwise there really would be no reason for them to be considering the testimony of Ms. Sciorra," Bachner said.

 

Another legal expert, defence attorney Julie Rendelman, said the jurors might be confused by the complexity of the predatory sexual assault charge.

 

The jury began its deliberations on Tuesday.

 

Since 2017, more than 80 women have accused Weinstein of sexual misconduct. He has denied the accusations and said any sexual encounters were consensual.

 

The allegations fuelled the #MeToo movement, in which women have accused powerful men in business, entertainment, media and politics of sexual misconduct.

 

(Reporting by Brendan Pierson; Additional reporting by Maria Caspani, Gabriella Borter and Tom Hals; Writing by Noeleen Walder; Editing by Daniel Wallis)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-02-22

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, BritManToo said:

In any court that operates on the rules of justice, there needs to be evidence.

It doesn't matter what crime was alleged to have been committed. 

any 'evidence' would be stale and crusty by now... 

Did any of them do a 'Monica saves Bills evidence' thing, here? 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

In any court that operates on the rules of justice, there needs to be evidence.

It doesn't matter what crime was alleged to have been committed. 

Very many criminals are convicted on sworn testimony alone.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hollywood has functioned this way since its inception. That doesn't excuse it, but people should know that there are a lot more like Harvey in Hollywood.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Matzzon said:

Why didn´t she bite?

he was giving, not receiving.

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...