webfact Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 ECT urged to pursue legal actions against FFP leader, execs By THE NATION Srisuwan Janya, an activist and secretary-general of the Society for Defence of the Thai Constitutions, submitted a letter to the Election Commission of Thailand (ECT) on Monday (February 24) urging it to pursue legal actions against Thanathorn Juangroongruangkit and 16 executives of the recently dissolved Future Forward Party (FWP) for violation of 2017 Organic Law on Political Parties. The Constitutional Court on February 21 ordered the Future Forward Party dissolved on the grounds that a loan of Bt191.2 million its wealthy leader Thanathorn extended to party members was a violation of the organic law’s Section 66 that limits the amount of money that can be collected in donations at Bt10 million, and Section 72 that prohibits political parties and their members from receiving money or assets from any sources when they know they are unlawful or have reasonable doubts of being unlawful. The court also revoked party executives’ right to contest in any elections for 10 years and prohibited them from registering a new party for the same length of time. “The penalty for violation of Section 66 will include imprisonment for up to five years, a fine of up to Bt100,000 or both for the donator,” said Srisuwan. “Meanwhile, the party that received illegal donations will be barred from the next election and fined up to Bt1 million and its executives be banned from politics for five years, whereas the money in excess of Bt10 million, or equal to Bt181 million in FWP’s case, must be seized and deposited to the Political Party Development Fund”. “Furthermore, FWP had used its revenues that came from fundraising, donations and souvenir selling to pay back the loan to Thanathorn, which violated Section 87 of the organic law that prohibits the use of a party’s revenues for purposes other than the party’s political activities,” added Srisuwan. “The violation of this section is punishable with 5-10 years imprisonment and fine of Bt100,000-200,000, or both.” “The Society for Defence of the Thai Constitutions wishes to urge the ECT to pursue legal actions against Thanathorn and FWP executives to set a standard for other political parties in Thailand. If the ECT ignores this request they might be violating the Criminal Code Section 157, which prohibits an official from not exercising any of his functions to the injury of any person,” added Srisuwan. Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30382731 -- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-02-24 Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking Thailand news and visa info 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post keith101 Posted February 24, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 24, 2020 What an absolute loser 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post PatOngo Posted February 24, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 24, 2020 9 minutes ago, keith101 said: What an absolute loser I would have called him a tosser! 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post keith101 Posted February 24, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 24, 2020 15 minutes ago, PatOngo said: I would have called him a tosser! I did that yesterday . 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Artisi Posted February 24, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 24, 2020 Will this follow the investigation into the convicted drug dealer currently a member of the dodgy parliament, or is that different? 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy cow cm Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 He is just the biggest turdpie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scot123 Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 There is still a land deal that has not been adequately explained as with the now stolen watches from a dead friend which have still not been returned or how a bunch of unelected D's who were never on any ballot paper (in fact to scared to even endorse a party) managed to keep their unelected positions!! What about the meal when campaigning was banned but hay we have to shhhhhh never mention shootings of innocents at the temple, removing of the plaque or gold mine........ The list goes on and on..... Shhhhhhhhh 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post DLock Posted February 24, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted February 24, 2020 Did Cha Cha ever recite the constitution correctly, or was that just overlooked as unimportant? I forget how it ended up? 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Artisi Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 18 minutes ago, DLock said: Did Cha Cha ever recite the constitution correctly, or was that just overlooked as unimportant? I forget how it ended up? What constitution? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyL Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 You only have to look at him in this photo to see where his true allegiances lie. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyL Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 1 hour ago, DLock said: Did Cha Cha ever recite the constitution correctly, or was that just overlooked as unimportant? I forget how it ended up? No they didn't, and they were still fully endorsed by the main man. That is the worry. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParkerN Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 Ah yes. Of course, the shills emerge from the woodwork. This guy would be better keeping his nose out, no matter how much he would like it to be brown. This is not a time for doing, it's a time for waiting and watching what other people do. May not get you a brown nose but there are benefits... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ParkerN Posted February 24, 2020 Share Posted February 24, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, BobbyL said: No they didn't, and they were still fully endorsed by the main man. That is the worry. The same one that approved to [deliberate] ommission in the first place. No help coming from that direction. Edited February 24, 2020 by ParkerN 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nobodysfriend Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 (edited) 16 hours ago, webfact said: whereas the money in excess of Bt10 million, or equal to Bt181 million in FWP’s case, must be seized and deposited to the Political Party Development Fund And that Fund is supervised ( controlled ) by whom ? 16 hours ago, webfact said: “The Society for Defence of the Thai Constitutions wishes to urge the ECT to pursue legal actions against Thanathorn and FWP executives to set a standard for other political parties in Thailand. That standard means : any political party that gets a lot of voters and dares to be critical towards the ruling party , will face dissolution and criminal pursuits . Welcome to thai democracy ... Edited February 25, 2020 by nobodysfriend 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klauskunkel Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 18 hours ago, webfact said: Society for Defence of the Thai Constitutions Thai Constitutions, notice the plural... Defend them all, the good and the bad, the funny and the serious, but especially the military ones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Tracy Posted February 25, 2020 Share Posted February 25, 2020 The Society for Defence of the Thai Constitutions I wonder where they get their funds from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now