Jump to content

Authorities ponder pleas from struggling airlines


webfact

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Rancid said:

Hmm, reminds me of the US years ago bailing out banks, car companies and insurance companies. The rich all hate socialism, except when its for them. Of course countries bailing out dead businesses pay for it from taxes, so of course the bill gets paid later by all the taxpayers.

 

If a company dies and the government considers it in the national interest then nationalize it, no CEO golden parachutes and shareholder bailouts.

Anything, absolutely anything to avoid letting some air out of the hot balloon. Had they allowed many of the banks and companies to fail, back in 2007-2008, the economy might have been far more fundamentally sound right now. It is teetering. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Burma Bill said:

Quote:-

"Nearly 9,800 flights to Thailand scheduled for March have been cancelled"

I wonder how TAT will juggle figures to show in increase - fake news possibly!!

In future all tourists will arrive on cruise ships.

 

BTW. Thai news reporting that Air Asia is suspending operations for 3 months.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

People don't want to fly. Some to avoid the virus, others to avoid getting stuck somewhere.

 

The PSC (700 THB intl) is buried in the ticket price, passengers hardly make travel decisions based on this, or to save 350 THB.

 

Passengers don't pay landing fees, parking fees, etc.

 

Repeat: People do not want to fly, I doubt FAs and pilots want to either? No amount of incentives will get people to want to fly. And we're told by the "authorities" (some of them anyway)  that we should stay home and not take advantage of low fares.

 

The ineptitude here is always eye-opening, perhaps never moreso that during crises.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, miamiman123 said:

But we got the Indians and Russians coming ..?hahahaga 

crazy as barn yard rats on a leaky raft floating down the Mekong river in a thunder storm on a sunny day eating bananas for lunch! 

Seem to be less Indians not more. More Russians but usually come with family/girlfriend. Keep themselves to themselves and few problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, stouricks said:

And who pray tell me pays the airlines?

 

Passengers.

 

 

But passengers do not pay AoT for landing fees, parking fees, et al. (Passengers do pay the PSC, as a separate line item on a ticket, but it is buried.)

 

Your next question will attempt to link "costs" with "fares". Feel free to go there.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

 

Passengers.

 

 

But passengers do not pay AoT for landing fees, parking fees, et al. (Passengers do pay the PSC, as a separate line item on a ticket, but it is buried.)

 

Your next question will attempt to link "costs" with "fares". Feel free to go there.

 

 

 

 

I shall go there. Where do the airlines get the money to pay the landing fees etc from? If passengers pay the PSC, do the airlines not use some of that, or a bit of the ticket price, or profit from selling a Mama noodle on board, to pay those fees.

Edited by stouricks
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

 

No. Airlines pass all of the PSC to AoT. That's why it is a separate line item, coded as "TS".

 

 

 

 

Whatever you want to say, the money to pay for landing fees etc has come from THE PASSENGERS, however it may be coded.

Edited by stouricks
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, stouricks said:

Whatever you want to say, the money to pay for landing fees etc has come from THE PASSENGERS, however it may be coded.

 

You're confusing landing fees, parking fees, etc. which the airport authority (entity operating the airport) charge airlines, with the PSC. These are not at all related.

 

I guess my point is that reducing operating costs to the airlines does not equate to more passengers. It can. It may. It might. But so many factors go into ticket prices. I won't even go into the 15 different fare buckets in economy.

 

And if people do not want to fly they will not be tempted by slightly lower prices. That's why these "proclamations" are so silly.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

 

No. Airlines pass all of the PSC to AoT. That's why it is a separate line item, coded as "TS".

 

 

 

 

 

Back in the day we had to pay this in cash (baht) upon departure. It was called a Departure Tax. It was viewed generally as a PITA, people had to save 500 baht to pay, so it was added into the price of the ticket. And bumped to 700 baht. Some blah blah blah about bumping it up to 800 baht, but no action. Assume it will go up soon.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The climate change alarmists must be laughing themselves silly.

 

They've been desperately trying to persude us all not to fly. Now a little virus is doing the job for them.

 

Wait a minute. . .

 

No, surely not!

Edited by Krataiboy
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Forza2002 said:

Nearly 9,800 flights to Thailand scheduled for March have been cancelled, representing a loss of three million passengers, Chula said. That's an average just over 300 passengers for each flight??

 

That is 316 flights and 96,775 passengers per day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...