Jump to content

Saksayam grilled on high-speed railway in East


webfact

Recommended Posts

Saksayam grilled on high-speed railway in East

By The Nation

 

800_2fd4886f887e933.jpg?v=1582704962

Saksayam Chidchob

 

Transport Minister Saksayam Chidchob, prodded by opposition MPs’ complaints about the stalled economy during the censure debate on Wednesday (February 24), found himself explaining the purpose of a planned high-speed railway in the East.

 

The rail line linking to U-tapao Airport in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) would support all forms of train transportation services, he said.

It involved global open bidding and had 31 foreign firms submitting offers.

 

Eight companies formed into two business groups, BSR and CPH, had qualified and the latter was selected because it offered higher yield by trimming Bt60 billion off the government’s required investment.

 

Saksayam was asked why the contract’s signing was delayed and what happened to the government’s original analysis, which said the 220-kilometre high-speed railway required 4,000 rai, along which infrastructure had to be cleared in 300 locations before construction could begin.

 

The opposition pointed out that 900 people living along the targeted route have been deemed illegal occupants but ought to be compensated for their eviction.

 

The minister said a commission had been established to conduct monthly inspections and the contract specified no financial compensation for anyone found encroaching.

 

Moreover, he said, if the government did not help investors in the Bt10-billion project, it would lose their confidence.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30382889

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-02-27
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And did he explain why the consortium led by the government's friend, CPH, was selected when CPH has absolutely no experience in high-speed railway infrastructure development. Yes, other firms with relevant experience are part of the consortium (Italian-Thai and a supposed Chinese firm that at least has railway construction in its name), but imagine the potential extra savings if CPH were not involved.

Edited by bangkokfrog
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...