Jump to content

U.S. envoy blames China for endangering world with coronavirus


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

At least can stop all the bat soup jokes already. The coronavirus found from bats that matches around 96% of SARS-CoV-2 couldn't infect humans.

The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

This sounds more like the undetected HIV infections for who knows how long before it was first discovered in the US. I wouldn't be surprised that many seasonal flu pneumonia cases in the past may have been wrongly diagnosed but might have instead been caused by this virus instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/26/2020 at 10:05 AM, AussieBob18 said:

I agree 100%.  China has manipulated the western governments and influencers and organisations through bribery and corruption.  You think Thailand is corrupt - that aint anything on China - over centuries they have refined it into an art form and teflon coated and titanium reinforced it.  There are many many examples of where China has done things and not been 'punished' and got things they wanted, that can only explained by one thing - they have them all under control.  It is no coincidence that after China was allowed to join the World Trade Organisation, that they immediately started to use their groing wealth to their own advantage.

 

The only way China will be held to account is if the People demand they be punished. All those that China has control and influence over will do some token action, and let them continue with their ways.  The People should and must complain and accuse them now - the more the better.  And then when the Wuhan Covid19 virus has passed, the People must then demand action be taken - only then will Govts and Organisations do something - because they will be forced to do it.

 

The USA is leading the charge to have them crucified and a lot of the American People want them severely punished. IMO the best way to do that is to shut down their World Trade Status and ban all trade and tourism into and out of China for 10 years.  If they comply and agree and accept - then and only then let them back in - after 5 years partially - but only if they implement open and elections whereby the People of China elect their Government.  Sanctions worked against USSR - they eventually went broke. By allowing China to trade with us, we have supported the Communists in power and they have used that wealth we gave them to entrench their power and spread into SEAsia (such as in Thailand) - the time is right to reverse that policy. 

 

The emperors still rule, though it may be a committee now.  Must be fun to have plenty of money and more fun to have all that power.  An entire herd of pigs.  Let swine flu take them all.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Selatan said:

Best explanation so far, from the experts, of course:

 

Coronavirus: pathogen could have been spreading in humans for decades, study says

 

 

Well, this South China Morning Post article proves the SCMP can't be trusted at all.

 

It tries desperately to abuse the study it cites to imply the virus did not start in Wuhan. That is not what the study says at all. I checked. It does not say the virus could have spread for decades.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Selatan said:

At least can stop all the bat soup jokes already. The coronavirus found from bats that matches around 96% of SARS-CoV-2 couldn't infect humans.

The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

This sounds more like the undetected HIV infections for who knows how long before it was first discovered in the US. I wouldn't be surprised that many seasonal flu pneumonia cases in the past may have been wrongly diagnosed but might have instead been caused by this virus instead.

Not really, the bat jokes can keep coming, from the study itself:

 

"As many early cases of COVID-19 were linked to the Huanan market in Wuhan1,2, it is possible that an animal source was present at this location. Given the similarity of SARS-CoV-2 to bat SARS-CoV-like coronaviruses2, it is likely that bats serve as reservoir hosts for its progenitor."

 

In reality it was never thought that bats were the actual animals sold in Wuhan, rather that animals sold at Wuhan got it from Bats. That's exactly what this study proves.

 

Furthermore it says,  "Estimates of the timing of the most recent common ancestor of SARS-CoV-2 made with current sequence data point to emergence of the virus in late November 2019 to early December 201923, compatible with the earliest retrospectively confirmed cases24. Hence, this scenario presumes a period of unrecognized transmission in humans between the initial zoonotic event and the acquisition of the polybasic cleavage site."

 

It does not mention "decades" like the SCMP claims, that is of course fantastically unlikely. Yes for a time there could be misdiagnosis, but not decades, as evidence by the speed with which that excellent Chinese female doctor recognised that this was most likely a coronavirus related event. 

 

Excellent study, poor and intentionally misleading journalism.

Edited by Logosone
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Woody Johnson would be more productive, by blaming the US government and the CDC for such a slow, lame, and destructive lack of response to this virus, early on. There is much blame to go around. And the administration deserves a huge amount of it. They messed up to a historic degree. And nobody can honestly say they did not see it coming. Trump allowed 300,000 people in from China, during the month of January, when the virus was raging in Wuhan and surroundings. And even after his infamous "lockdown" on Feb. 2nd, he continued to allow all Americans and Chinese with green cards to come and go as they pleased from China, without any screening, no doubt contributing dramatically to the number of cases we are seeing today. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, Pompeo may be blaming China but he can also be very forgiving. And no, not fake news. This is a press release from Pompeo himself:

 

The United States Announces Assistance To Combat the Novel Coronavirus

"This week the State Department has facilitated the transportation of nearly 17.8 tons of donated medical supplies to the Chinese people, including masks, gowns, gauze, respirators, and other vital materials.  These donations are a testament to the generosity of the American people."

https://www.state.gov/the-united-states-announces-assistance-to-combat-the-novel-coronavirus/

Trump administration sent protective medical gear to China while he minimized the virus threat to US

 

Back on February 7, the World Health Organization sounded alarm bells about "the limited stock of PPE," noting demand was 100 times higher than normal for this equipment.https://edition.cnn.com/2020/03/29/opinions/coronavirus-personal-protective-equipment-obeidallah/index.html
 
 
 
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Selatan said:

At least can stop all the bat soup jokes already. The coronavirus found from bats that matches around 96% of SARS-CoV-2 couldn't infect humans.

The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2

This sounds more like the undetected HIV infections for who knows how long before it was first discovered in the US. I wouldn't be surprised that many seasonal flu pneumonia cases in the past may have been wrongly diagnosed but might have instead been caused by this virus instead.

The study says that the adaptation to humans could also have occurred in animals which have the same "high receptor homology" as humans, ie

 

"ferrets, cats and other species with high receptor homology".

 

So the most likely explanation is not that it spread in humans for a long time, rather that it jumped from bat to a species which has human-like high receptor homology, such as ferret, cat etc, and adapted in that host. Then such an animal passed on the virus to a human.

 

Why the SCMP tries desperately to imply that it proves that the virus spread for decades in humans is clear, it wants to make a case that the virus did not come from Wuhan but outside China. This propaganda is very crude and unsophisticated. They could at least left out the 'decades' claim, which is not in the study.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since Covid19 from bats can not spread to humans directly, but has most likely spread to cats I'd be more worried about pussycats since they have the same time of receptors we do.

 

Direct human to cat transmission has already been documented.

 

https://www.livescience.com/cat-infected-covid-19-from-owner.html

 

Obviously could happen the other way as well. But these are very rare events.

 

Edited by Logosone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, simple1 said:

Many are joint venture companies. With your scenario there would be massive capital / profit losses for Western companies in China. When are you going to China to lead the revolution - LOL

True - but there are very few assets in China owned by foreigners - which was my point. They cant take anywhere near as much of 'our' assets, if we take the $billions of assets that they have in our countries (the west).

Western companies would lose that is true - but look at who and what they are - companies that chose to manufacture in China instead of the west - because it was more profitable for them.  Bad luck for them - bring it back home - the game has changed.

Not anytime soon will I visit China - cant even buy a ticket to get out of the country, let alone into China, which for obvious reasons I would not like to do ????

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AussieBob18 said:

True - but there are very few assets in China owned by foreigners - which was my point.

 

Really? That was your point. Here's what you wrote:

"Are you serious? There are nil foreign factories in China - they are all owned by China. You cannot buy any property in China as there is no private ownership of land in China. One can only obtain rights to use land.  They are not stupid - we are, to allow them to buy our property - land included.  Get educated about something before you start criticisng what you dont have a clue about."

You could do worse than take the last sentence of your post to heart.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, AussieBob18 said:

True - but there are very few assets in China owned by foreigners - which was my point. They cant take anywhere near as much of 'our' assets, if we take the $billions of assets that they have in our countries (the west).

Western companies would lose that is true - but look at who and what they are - companies that chose to manufacture in China instead of the west - because it was more profitable for them.  Bad luck for them - bring it back home - the game has changed.

Not anytime soon will I visit China - cant even buy a ticket to get out of the country, let alone into China, which for obvious reasons I would not like to do ????

 

Companies that generate profit for their Western shareholders. China has opened up recently in order that Western financial services companies can operate in their own right, assume there would be other industry verticals. India is also a major location for Western companies outsourcing e.g. software services is an example worth billions of dollars, automobile manufacturing and so on. Unfortunately India is also a major abuser of human rights, yet very little is said. Last, but not least trump companies for years outsourced to China, continued doing so even after he was elected. trump and family are excellent examples for hypocritical behaviour.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, simple1 said:

Companies that generate profit for their Western shareholders. China has opened up recently in order that Western financial services companies can operate in their own right, assume there would be other industry verticals. India is also a major location for Western companies outsourcing e.g. software services is an example worth billions of dollars, automobile manufacturing and so on. Unfortunately India is also a major abuser of human rights, yet very little is said. Last, but not least trump companies for years outsourced to China, continued doing so even after he was elected. trump and family are excellent examples for hypocritical behaviour.

Why bring politics into it - Trump has been POTUS elect since 2016 and in the White House since 2017 and will be until 2024.

 

China has not opened up as you say - or imply - they have facilitated the continuation of Hong Kong's finanical role in the world, and are using it to their advantage.  IMO the finanical world should have been forced by Govts to move to Singapore, but China had used the time it was given to corrupt/convice enough powerful people to leave things almost as they were.  

 

Dont get me wrong - I dont dislike China - I hate and loath them. They have gotten away with so much since they were allopwed to 'join the world' that it would be impossible to list them all.  Time to put them back in their place. 

Edited by AussieBob18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AussieBob18 said:

China has not opened up as you say - <SNIP>

Look up WFOE, Plus foreign lenders to establish wholly-owned banks in China, and removing the need for prior approval for conducting businesses in the local currency, known as the renminbi or yuan. are permitted

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, simple1 said:

Look up WFOE, Plus foreign lenders to establish wholly-owned banks in China, and removing the need for prior approval for conducting businesses in the local currency, known as the renminbi or yuan. are permitted

 

They are like a foreigner in Thailand setting up a Thai Business using foreign money at start-up.  But I hear what you are saying in that they are like a 'real' company - even though they are under China laws - and I dont think the land any factory is constructed upon is owned by the corporation - only leased?  Either way, the issue is what asset values do foreigners have/own in China versus what China owns in the west (which does include title/ownership).  Is it 2 to 1 or 10 to 1 or 100 to 1.  Dont know the exact numbers myself - but I think more the latter than the former.  Might look that up tomorrow - we are about to watch another quarantine time movie ????

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AussieBob18 said:

Why bring politics into it - Trump has been POTUS elect since 2016 and in the White House since 2017 and will be until 2024.

I would advise you to keep sticking to arguments that depend on predictions. That way, you don't have to worry about the facts contradicting. At least for a prolonged length of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Logosone said:

Well, this South China Morning Post article proves the SCMP can't be trusted at all.

 

It tries desperately to abuse the study it cites to imply the virus did not start in Wuhan. That is not what the study says at all. I checked. It does not say the virus could have spread for decades.

SCMP may have arrived at their own conclusion from this:
 

Quote

Hence, this scenario presumes a period of unrecognized transmission in humans between the initial zoonotic event and the acquisition of the polybasic cleavage site. Sufficient opportunity could have arisen if there had been many prior zoonotic events that produced short chains of human-to-human transmission over an extended period.


Totally valid conclusion, if you ask me, because nobody knew how long it has been happening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Logosone said:

Not really, the bat jokes can keep coming, from the study itself:

 

"As many early cases of COVID-19 were linked to the Huanan market in Wuhan1,2, it is possible that an animal source was present at this location. Given the similarity of SARS-CoV-2 to bat SARS-CoV-like coronaviruses2, it is likely that bats serve as reservoir hosts for its progenitor."

 

In reality it was never thought that bats were the actual animals sold in Wuhan, rather that animals sold at Wuhan got it from Bats. That's exactly what this study proves.

 

Furthermore it says,  "Estimates of the timing of the most recent common ancestor of SARS-CoV-2 made with current sequence data point to emergence of the virus in late November 2019 to early December 201923, compatible with the earliest retrospectively confirmed cases24. Hence, this scenario presumes a period of unrecognized transmission in humans between the initial zoonotic event and the acquisition of the polybasic cleavage site."

 

It does not mention "decades" like the SCMP claims, that is of course fantastically unlikely. Yes for a time there could be misdiagnosis, but not decades, as evidence by the speed with which that excellent Chinese female doctor recognised that this was most likely a coronavirus related event. 

 

Excellent study, poor and intentionally misleading journalism.

Bat coronavirus closest to the new virus couldn't really infect humans:
 

Quote

As many early cases of COVID-19 were linked to the Huanan market in Wuhan, it is possible that an animal source was present at this location. Given the similarity of SARS-CoV-2 to bat SARS-CoV-like coronaviruses, it is likely that bats serve as reservoir hosts for its progenitor. Although RaTG13, sampled from a Rhinolophus affinis bat, is ~96% identical overall to SARS-CoV-2, its spike diverges in the RBD, which suggests that it may not bind efficiently to human ACE2.


You are free to come out with different animal to joke about though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i have been going to china past 20years  and the usa over 40years on and off 

china is miles ahead of usa in infrastructure and medical care for its people

how much money is usa in dept to china 

why are the medical supply's coming from china /cargo plane after plane coming from china to usa from china /trump didn't tell you that/the WHO offer test kits trump said no he will make there own /they failed now test kits coming from china/as the stumbling goes on people are suffering/why are they so slow?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, opalred said:

i have been going to china past 20years  and the usa over 40years on and off 

china is miles ahead of usa in infrastructure and medical care for its people

how much money is usa in dept to china 

why are the medical supply's coming from china /cargo plane after plane coming from china to usa from china /trump didn't tell you that/the WHO offer test kits trump said no he will make there own /they failed now test kits coming from china/as the stumbling goes on people are suffering/why are they so slow?

 

 

China the big exporter of faulty junk.

 

https://www.businessinsider.com/coroanvirus-holland-recalls-over-half-a-million-masks-imported-from-china-2020-3

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/30/2020 at 6:18 PM, simple1 said:

Look up WFOE, Plus foreign lenders to establish wholly-owned banks in China, and removing the need for prior approval for conducting businesses in the local currency, known as the renminbi or yuan. are permitted

Done a bit of research and what you said has some validity. But it l;ooks like there is still a very long way to go before they are ever truly 'open'.  Quote:  n November 2017, China first announced a plan to allow foreign companies to own financial services businesses in China. That plan called for allowing ownership of 51% of financial firms in three years and the removal of all restrictions in five years.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rebeccafannin/2019/07/20/chinas-speedier-timetable-to-lift-foreign-ownership-of-its-financial-sector-puts-onus-on-investors/#1f1cedd11f70

 

I also found that there is ab organisation tracking China's foreign investment overseas - and it is extensive: 

US$2034.22 Billion in Total. That is a huge amount.

https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/

Plenty there to take in reparations if they dont cough up ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/30/2020 at 8:05 PM, bristolboy said:

I would advise you to keep sticking to arguments that depend on predictions. That way, you don't have to worry about the facts contradicting. At least for a prolonged length of time.

Until 2024 for sure - glad you agree.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, AussieBob18 said:

Done a bit of research and what you said has some validity. But it l;ooks like there is still a very long way to go before they are ever truly 'open'.  Quote:  n November 2017, China first announced a plan to allow foreign companies to own financial services businesses in China. That plan called for allowing ownership of 51% of financial firms in three years and the removal of all restrictions in five years.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rebeccafannin/2019/07/20/chinas-speedier-timetable-to-lift-foreign-ownership-of-its-financial-sector-puts-onus-on-investors/#1f1cedd11f70

 

I also found that there is ab organisation tracking China's foreign investment overseas - and it is extensive: 

US$2034.22 Billion in Total. That is a huge amount.

https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/

Plenty there to take in reparations if they dont cough up ????

 

More recent info for financial services...

 

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china-finance/trade-deal-touts-financial-sector-wins-china-to-scrap-securities-business-cap-faster-idUSKBN1ZE2OI

 

In the scheme of things is 2 trillion that much for a superpower such as China. To put in perspective, Chinese were siphoning corrupt money to offshore Western banks at something like a trillion a year & more.

 

Oz has recently announced a ban on Chinese players buying Oz assets, at least whilst the Covid financial crisis is in play.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously this guys is a right wing media presenter - but the first 6 minutes is about the Australian 60 minutes report detailing that China lied, and the next 4 minutes details an internal Chinese scientific paper that casts huge doubt on the origin being from a wet market and that is was most likely leaked/escape (human error).  I tend to believe that - their actions are very much of a guilty party trying to cover up their mistake.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, AussieBob18 said:

Obviously this guys is a right wing media presenter - but the first 6 minutes is about the Australian 60 minutes report detailing that China lied, and the next 4 minutes details an internal Chinese scientific paper that casts huge doubt on the origin being from a wet market and that is was most likely leaked/escape (human error).  I tend to believe that - their actions are very much of a guilty party trying to cover up their mistake.

 

 

It's a pity that virologists tend to strongly disagree with you. You know, scientists who specialize in this. Science really isn't about consumer preferences.

No, the coronavirus wasn’t made in a lab. A genetic analysis shows it’s from nature

The coronavirus pandemic circling the globe is caused by a natural virus, not one made in a lab, a new study says.

The virus’s genetic makeup reveals that SARS-CoV-2 isn’t a mishmash of known viruses, as might be expected if it were human-made. And it has unusual features that have only recently been identified in scaly anteaters called pangolins, evidence that the virus came from nature, Kristian Andersen and his colleagues report March 17 in Nature Medicine.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/coronavirus-covid-19-not-human-made-lab-genetic-analysis-nature

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...