Jump to content

U.S. indicts Venezuela's Maduro, a political foe, for 'narco-terrorism'


webfact

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, webfact said:

The State Department offered a reward of up to $15 million (£12.33 million) for information leading to the arrest and conviction of Maduro

How much do I get if I tell them the residence where he can be found dwelling?

Edited by Bluespunk
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, fasteddie said:

Remind me again what Venezuela has lots of, oh that's right, OIL! More trumped up charges to steal another sovereign nations resources as in Iraq, Libya, Syria.

 

At the moment Russia is busy looting Venezuela's gold mining. Whilst Maduro and his highly corrupt regime and family loot the oil revenues.

 

And neither country tolerates democracy, free speech or human rights.

 

Ain't socialism just grand!

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Off topic posts and replies about Saddam Hussein have been removed. 

 

An inflammatory post was removed. 

 

A post in which multi quoting was used has been removed:

 

5. Please do not quote multiple nested quotes. Quote only the relevant section that you are discussing. Moderators will snip excessively long nested quotes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no doubt... Maduro is a criminal and everything else...

 

But there's a certain sad irony here...

 

Barr's Justice Department under Trump figures they can indict a (somewhat) president of a foreign country on criminal charges.

 

But the same Barr Justice Department says they are somehow barred from indicting an equally big U.S. president criminal on criminal charges....

 

So just how exactly did they figure that???

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

I have no doubt... Maduro is a criminal and everything else...

 

But there's a certain sad irony here...

 

Barr's Justice Department under Trump figures they can indict a (somewhat) president of a foreign country on criminal charges.

 

But the same Barr Justice Department says they are somehow barred from indicting an equally big U.S. president criminal on criminal charges....

 

So just how exactly did they figure that???

Not the first time a "head of state" has been indicted. Remeber Noriega? 

 

One has got nothing to do with the other, other than to continue to feed into the anti Trump echo chamber.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Nyezhov said:

One has got nothing to do with the other, other than to continue to feed into the anti Trump echo chamber.  

 

I wouldn't say that.... There's no law or court ruling that I'm aware of that says a sitting U.S. president cannot be prosecuted by the feds... As best as I'm aware, it's a Justice Department legal opinion that predated Trump...

 

But if you can't see the irony and contrast between the two different situations, what can I say!!!

 

The U.S. can prosecute the heads of states of other countries, but not its own country.....  Something's definitely out of whack in that scenario.

 

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




  • Popular Now

×
×
  • Create New...