Jump to content

Wake up guys!


Brunolem

Recommended Posts

30 minutes ago, Olmate said:

Healthland let you in? 

 

Yes, but this was before the virus. Now thanks to this idiot Imperial College paper that even UK newspapers are laughing about we of course have LACKDAWWWN so nobody can get into Healthland or a spa with attractive masseuses.

 

Thank you UK.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Lacessit said:

If you think so much of Ning, why didn't you marry her?

Don't think I haven't considered it. As well as a massage goddess she looks like an Asian version of a young Phoebe Cates. Above all she really cares. You know she'll dig for that muscle knot until she finds it, then stretches you at the end. The effort she puts in, my God.

 

But these Asian women are expensive, and I already have one. I bet Somchai has been a drain on the purse over the years. Imagine two of them. Even if this were Indonesia and we were all muslims, I don't think it's viable.

Edited by Logosone
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AussieBob18 said:

Everyone will be pleased to know that two 63 year olods who had the virus in Australia have fully recovered and are back in USA.  That is right - Tom Hanks and his wife are fine now and back in the USA - thank goodness - I was so worried and I assume you all were too of course ????

 

Clearly this is a catastrophic infection that is going to kill millions. And it is not as if there are any other causes of humans dieing in the world in such numbers - not true - otjherwise surely we would be told about it.  It is all fake news when they talk about the millions who have died from TB and Malaria and Hepatitis and HIV/AIDs and car accidents etc etc. I dont klnow anyone - so it is just not true.  No - this virus is real and it will kill millions I tell you - millions.  I am so glad they have shut down the world's economies and crashed all the stock markets and created massive business losses and inevitable bankruptcies and many millions of unemployed.  No I am serious - stop laughing at me.  And - now they know how to do it I hope it stays forever.  That way we can maybe stop climate change and the planet's catastrophic death within 12 years - true - AOC said so.

 

Satire? What satire?? This is too serious to joke about.

Hi Bob hope you will be volunteering at ER when they need a hand for this pesky flu. They sure could do with a helping hand. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Don't think I haven't considered it. As well as a massage goddess she looks like an Asian version of a young Phoebe Cates. Above all she really cares. You know she'll dig for that muscle knot until she finds it, then stretches you at the end. The effort she puts in, my God.

 

But these Asian women are expensive, and I already have one. I bet Somchai has been a drain on the purse over the years. Imagine two of them. Even if this were Indonesia and we were all muslims, I don't think it's viable.

You are in the wrong thread bud!

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Logosone said:

Here we have the good Dr Neil Ferguson on record:

 

"Our estimates – while subject to much uncertainty due to the limited data currently available – suggest that the impact of the unfolding epidemic may be comparable to the major influenza pandemics of the twentieth century."

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/195217/coronavirus-fatality-rate-estimated-imperial-scientists/

 

Fast forward one month and it's:

 

"UK deaths from the disease are now unlikely to exceed 20,000, he said, and could be much lower"


https://www.newscientist.com/article/2238578-uk-has-enough-intensive-care-units-for-coronavirus-expert-predicts/

 

And he's saying he didn't back-peddle, that sly little weasel....

 

He can go sit on a Christmas tree this stupidass Dr Ferguson. He's had the whole world closed down because 0.003% of the population of the UK may or may not die in the next few weeks, the majority of whom are over 80 years old and would have died anyway.

You say "He's had the whole world closed down because 0.003% of the population of the UK may or may not die in the next few weeks"

 

So you're saying all the governments across the world are following the advice of one British guy? And some say the British no longer have any influence... ????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Blue Mango said:

You say "He's had the whole world closed down because 0.003% of the population of the UK may or may not die in the next few weeks"

 

So you're saying all the governments across the world are following the advice of one British guy? And some say the British no longer have any influence... ????

We have definitely witnessed a world wide adoption of Dr Ferguson's social distancing fetish.

 

Not completely of course, there are exceptions:

 

The Netherlands has so far chosen a softer set of measures than most Western European countries; it was late to close its schools and restaurants and hasn’t ordered a full lockdown. In a 16 March speech, Prime Minister Mark Rutte rejected “working endlessly to contain the virus” and “shutting down the country completely.” Instead, he opted for “controlled spread” of the virus among the groups least at risk of severe illness while making sure the health system isn’t swamped with COVID-19 patients. 

 

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2020/03/mathematics-life-and-death-how-disease-models-shape-national-shutdowns-and-other#

 

However, even the Americans were influenced by this infernal piece of <deleted> report from Neil Ferguson:

 

"American officials said the report, which projected up to 2.2 million deaths in the United States from such a spread, also influenced the White House to strengthen its measures to isolate members of the public."

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/world/europe/coronavirus-imperial-college-johnson.html

 

Some said governments should treat the report’s projections about suppression policies with the same caution. It says social distancing measures might have to be imposed for 18 months or more, at least intermittently, until a vaccine is developed and tested. But the report acknowledges this is uncertain, given the possibility of drug treatments and the mystery of how the virus is transmitted.

 

British officials recognize that their health service faces a moment of truth. All non-urgent operations in England will be postponed for at least three months, starting April 15, to free up 30,000 beds to help tackle the coronavirus.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/world/europe/coronavirus-imperial-college-johnson.html

 

Part of the reason why the Americans looked at the Imperial College, apart from the fact that it was IC and it was in English was of course that Neil Ferguson deliberately flirted with the US in a coquettish manner and also refers to the US in his paper.

 

There is no question that many governments copied what the US and UK were doing. Singapore, South Korea, Germany, Sweden, Netherlands being some of the notable exceptions, and coincidentally being the most successful in mitigating deaths. 

 

So basically everyone is following the wrong model. The UK model. Yes, your highly benign influence again screwing up the world for generations to come. Hello Palestine, Syria, Kenya, Zimbabwe, Northern Ireland, Malaysia, Cyprus, Nigeria, there is nothing the British will not mess up. Of course this is a new scale. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, URMySunshine said:

Boris. Did.It We were warned. Trump's gonna be furious so please don't tell him. 

 

Joking aside though that's your spin on the NYT report and doesn't quite explain why ER's are overwhelmed with multiple additional deaths when the virus reaches a critical mass in its host countries.Time and time again. It's like the Y2K bug if it all goes well then folk will say was it worth it. If it is ultimately inconsequential as you suggest then a world rest may turn out to be a healthy way to start the world and countries on a different trajectory. A system reboot that cleans out a load of accumulated <deleted> that was taking us nowhere. The bubble to end all bubbles had to pop in the end and the world needs to move to more domestic production and a more equitable way of organising society. This changes have already begun.

To be fair Boris was probably innocent here. He was clearly embarrassed by this Neil Ferguson, one of his main advisers. First he published a model which suggested the UK should go for herd immunity. Then he suddenly completely revised his paper and went a different way, strong suppression. Poor Boris didn't know which way his head was spinning and his crack team didn't prevent him from becoming infected. Or the health secretary. Looks like something in that Cobra meeting room needs to be washed.

 

But joking aside indeed, because this is serious, obviously it is not inconsequential for those who are affected and whose immune system can not defeat the virus. There is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that despite exceptions this will mostly be older people, those who die are around the 80 years age mark. In terms of health, it will be inconsequential for most, even this Dr Frankenstein, sorry, Ferguson, now concedes the number of deaths in the UK will be 20,000 or considerably less. So that's what, 0.003% of the population of the UK, of mostly the very old over 80.

 

However, something of course Dr Frankenstein Ferguson has not calculated through in his rather huge brain is the economic consequences of the total lockdowns which the world is now doing because of his half-arsed fly by the elbow seat of his pants spreadsheet calculations. Imagine how many people have been ruined, their lives destroyed because this guy can't get his figures right. He had one job. One. And he bocked it up.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you know, frankly this argument 'oh we were going into a huge recession anyway'...that's nonsense.

 

It is these lockdowns and the massive economic freak-out the UK, US, EU and everyone else did which will ensure the giant recession will come.

 

This was totally avoidable. It need not have happened the way it did. People did this. It was not some inexorable law of economics. Don't believe that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Logosone said:

To be fair Boris was probably innocent here. He was clearly embarrassed by this Neil Ferguson, one of his main advisers. First he published a model which suggested the UK should go for herd immunity. Then he suddenly completely revised his paper and went a different way, strong suppression. Poor Boris didn't know which way his head was spinning and his crack team didn't prevent him from becoming infected. Or the health secretary. Looks like something in that Cobra meeting room needs to be washed.

 

But joking aside indeed, because this is serious, obviously it is not inconsequential for those who are affected and whose immune system can not defeat the virus. There is absolutely no doubt whatsoever that despite exceptions this will mostly be older people, those who die are around the 80 years age mark. In terms of health, it will be inconsequential for most, even this Dr Frankenstein, sorry, Ferguson, now concedes the number of deaths in the UK will be 20,000 or considerably less. So that's what, 0.003% of the population of the UK, of mostly the very old over 80.

 

However, something of course Dr Frankenstein Ferguson has not calculated through in his rather huge brain is the economic consequences of the total lockdowns which the world is now doing because of his half-arsed fly by the elbow seat of his pants spreadsheet calculations. Imagine how many people have been ruined, their lives destroyed because this guy can't get his figures right. He had one job. One. And he bocked it up.

 

 

 

Advisors advise ministers decide is an age old British mandarin mantra. So the buck stop with Boris I'm afraid and his team in the end. If this was China though and what you say turns out to be true poor old Professor Ferguson would be facing a firing squad. Of course what will likely happen is we all show off how we can respond and pull together as a nation and we wind this down sooner rather later and pat all ourselves on the back at what a good job we have done. 

 

Finally there is a fair bit of triumphalist hindsight in your analysis now with 3 months of data in to make these assumptions. We can all predict the lottery numbers the day after the draw. Now what do I do with cupboards full of pasta , flour and beans.....and bleedin oxygen can you believe !

 

And here you go the dirty secret if that's what it is will remain to most just that, a secret , for most it will be declared a triumph for public health policy in the short to medium term. 

 

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/coronavirus-death-toll-could-just-21769975

Edited by URMySunshine
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, Logosone said:

There is no question that many governments copied what the US and UK were doing. Singapore, South Korea, Germany, Sweden, Netherlands being some of the notable exceptions, and coincidentally being the most successful in mitigating deaths. 

I don't have the inclination to fact check all of your claims, but here's what I found on Germany after a 2 second search.  Sounds pretty much in line with the measures the UK implemented? 

 

Before entering quarantine, Merkel tightened Germany's lockdown measures including banning gatherings of more than two people. Last week, she called the disease the country's biggest challenge since World War II.

Germany has already closed down schools, non-essential shops and urged people not to gather in groups

https://www.straitstimes.com/world/europe/german-chancellor-merkel-in-quarantine-as-country-bans-gatherings-of-more-than-two-to

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Blue Mango said:

I don't have the inclination to fact check all of your claims, but here's what I found on Germany after a 2 second search.  Sounds pretty much in line with the measures the UK implemented? 

 

Before entering quarantine, Merkel tightened Germany's lockdown measures including banning gatherings of more than two people. Last week, she called the disease the country's biggest challenge since World War II.

Germany has already closed down schools, non-essential shops and urged people not to gather in groups

https://www.straitstimes.com/world/europe/german-chancellor-merkel-in-quarantine-as-country-bans-gatherings-of-more-than-two-to

 

 

 

German hasn't banned gatherings of more than two people, more than two people can still congregate outside if they are from the same household. The actual German distance prescription is smaller 1.50 m, not 2 m like in the UK. There are also a few other differences, but the key difference of the German approach is this:

 

From the start Germany has aggressively tested, identified and isolated carriers. This was possible in Germany because they had a lot of test kits which were produced quickly, and also a lot of icu beds (28000 to the UK's 5000), more respirators.

 

The UK has not tested in the same way as Germany, though recently BJ has announced he will. It is not testing in the same way however. Germany's testing approach is more aggressive.

 

But yes, in recent days there has been a convergence in that countries that hitherto had adopted different approaches, such as testing and isolating (Germany and Singapore or SKorea) or herd immunity (Netherlands) have  in fact also added the social distancing favoured in the UK, except Germany that had it a bit earlier than the UK. The UK of course has to rely on social distancing more because at least initially they do not have the testing or treatment facilities of others like Germany. That's what Neil Ferguson said in his report, that they did not consider testing because they did not have the test kits.

 

The reason why all the others are jumping on the social distancing bandwagon is perhaps that they saw the UK change from herd immunity approach to social distancing (suppression). This was because Neil Ferguson revised his paper radically and suddenly came to a very different conclusion.

 

Other countries would have seen how much the UK relies on social distancing and no doubt added it to the repertoire because it was seen as another measure, which probably works if the UK relies on it so much.

 

The evidence that social distancing works at all is very flimsy though, and is basically based on influenza pandemics. However the influenza virus is fundamantally different and transmission is different. Transmission with Covid19 is much quicker, because it's asymptomatic, ie by stealth, and because 50% of those infected show no symptoms at all. This means that the speed of the transmission works against social distancing. If it is the case that the UK is approaching 60% of infected then social distancing would make no sense anymore as herd immunity would be close. Not that it made that much sense to start with, as it merely delayed transmission a little bit, due to the speed of Covid19 transmission. That was not known when Ferguson penned his paper.

 

 

Edited by Logosone
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, bartender100 said:

260 died yesterday in the UK, one of those i knew personally, and she dies in complete agony France had even more deaths

 

And some clowns think this is not serious

Sorry to hear of your loss. For some sadly this is going to be very serious indeed , whatever the eventual outcome society wise. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, bartender100 said:

260 died yesterday in the UK, one of those i knew personally, and she dies in complete agony France had even more deaths

 

And some clowns think this is not serious

You are being charitable.  Ignorant, malicious, and mentally ill are more appropriate terms. It is their personal therapy to cope with a crisis that they cannot otherwise manage. They need to find a solution to a problem which overwhelms them, and so they  cling  to crazy claims.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, for example I saw one fool claim that there is no immunity to Covid19, because people don't develop immunity to Aids. He didn't know that the Aids virus is a stealth virus which is makes it much harder for the immune system to break down. Completely different illness. Imagine what a fool.

 

A lot of people talk a lot of nonsense on here. You really have to be careful.

Edited by Logosone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Logosone said:

Yes, for example I saw one fool claim that there is no immunity to Covid19, because people don't develop immunity to Aids. He didn't know that the Aids virus is a stealth virus which is makes it much harder for the immune system to break down. Completely different illness. Imagine what a fool.

 

A lot of people talk a lot of nonsense on here. You really have to be careful.

Sometimes I think I'm through with here but wise guys like you come along and make it worth the while. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have said it in another thread and will say it here again.

 

From the early start of the measures taken, I have advocated this is all about controlling people.

 

Big brother and suppression, and testing how far they can go with it.

 

I don't want to claim the virus was created for that purpose, but it was man created for a certain purpose, and i don't think it were the Chinese.

 

In my opinion, the Chinese have done a pretty good job containing the virus in their own country by locking down almost an entire country, but that is not too difficult in a communist country.

 

The other countries in the world have seen an opportunity in this, to test how far they can go with their own population.

 

I agree about the seriousness of the infections in countries like Italy and Spain, but the infections are concentrated to certain areas and 90% of the fatalities worldwide are in a certain age group, so no need to lock down a complete country.

 

Have you also noticed that for the past few months most of the famous investors were mostly in cash, but were still advocating that the markets were healthy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Susco said:

I have said it in another thread and will say it here again.

 

From the early start of the measures taken, I have advocated this is all about controlling people.

 

Big brother and suppression, and testing how far they can go with it.

 

I don't want to claim the virus was created for that purpose, but it was man created for a certain purpose, and i don't think it were the Chinese.

 

In my opinion, the Chinese have done a pretty good job containing the virus in their own country by locking down almost an entire country, but that is not too difficult in a communist country.

 

The other countries in the world have seen an opportunity in this, to test how far they can go with their own population.

 

I agree about the seriousness of the infections in countries like Italy and Spain, but the infections are concentrated to certain areas and 90% of the fatalities worldwide are in a certain age group, so no need to lock down a complete country.

 

Have you also noticed that for the past few months most of the famous investors were mostly in cash, but were still advocating that the markets were healthy?

At market peaks most of the institutional investors are taking profits whilst shilling the rigged game to retails before the blow. I got out based on the science at the end of February and am back in based on the science and as an ex scientist this was an easy call to make. The markets haven't been healthy for years - just Ponzi shored up with QE and herd mentality. Sadly many and some here thought it was a one way bet. There's no such thing. I'm not a spiv but if I see free money I pick it up , oh and don't follow Trump he's a bankrupt and liar. Another easy call.  

Edited by URMySunshine
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, URMySunshine said:

At market peaks most of the institutional investors are taking profits whilst shilling the rigged game to retails before the blow. I got out based on the science at the end of February and am back in based on the science and as an ex scientist this was an easy call to make. The markets haven't been healthy for years - just Ponzi shored up with QE and herd mentality. Sadly many and some here thought it was a one way bet. There's no such thing. 

 

That's also what I'm saying, but I think there is more behind this.

 

The working class got too wealthy, so encourage them to buy equities, which is easy in a never ending bull market.

 

Then let the markets crash while the 1% is in cash already. Rinse and repeat

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Susco said:

 

That's also what I'm saying, but I think there is more behind this.

 

The working class got too wealthy, so encourage them to buy equities, which is easy in a never ending bull market.

 

Then let the markets crash while the 1% is in cash already. Rinse and repeat

The shoeshine boy moment. Twas ever thus hopefully those robbed will scale the walls of the elites and burn them down to teach them a lesson rather than turn on those less fortunate. 

 

Vive La Liberte !

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Logosone said:

"Whoever thinks that governments end viruses is wrong."

 

Dr Yoram Lass is an Israeli physician, politician and former Director General of the Health Ministry. He also worked as Associate Dean of the Tel Aviv University Medical School.

 

Thankfully the German health system was well prepared and is even able to take in patients from Italy and France as it has spare capacity. 

 

So clearly this particular country had the hospitals and equipment and skilled manpower.

 

Why not the UK or US? The point is that many reputable people warned a long time that a pandemic was coming. Governments failed to prepare. They should have. You think inreasing testing capacities would not have made a difference early on? It certainly would have.

 

The governments have failed. Miserably. And the people who will end this virus will not be government. Even while Boris Johnson and Neil Ferguson, the biggest social distancing fanatics, espouse their social distancing religion for which there is no hard data that it works with Covid19 whatsoever, they are lying in bed nursing a Covid19 infection. They are fortunately contributing to herd immunity, however, the economic cost of their lockdowns will be payed for by our children's children. The governments have failed on all fronts.

The Germans got their act together and tested. If they hadn’t they’d be having the same issues as other countries. So far Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea have done likewise, with good results. They all learned the lessons from previous outbreaks like SARS. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Logosone said:

German hasn't banned gatherings of more than two people, more than two people can still congregate outside if they are from the same household. The actual German distance prescription is smaller 1.50 m, not 2 m like in the UK. There are also a few other differences, but the key difference of the German approach is this:

 

From the start Germany has aggressively tested, identified and isolated carriers. This was possible in Germany because they had a lot of test kits which were produced quickly, and also a lot of icu beds (28000 to the UK's 5000), more respirators.

 

The UK has not tested in the same way as Germany, though recently BJ has announced he will. It is not testing in the same way however. Germany's testing approach is more aggressive.

 

But yes, in recent days there has been a convergence in that countries that hitherto had adopted different approaches, such as testing and isolating (Germany and Singapore or SKorea) or herd immunity (Netherlands) have  in fact also added the social distancing favoured in the UK, except Germany that had it a bit earlier than the UK. The UK of course has to rely on social distancing more because at least initially they do not have the testing or treatment facilities of others like Germany. That's what Neil Ferguson said in his report, that they did not consider testing because they did not have the test kits.

 

The reason why all the others are jumping on the social distancing bandwagon is perhaps that they saw the UK change from herd immunity approach to social distancing (suppression). This was because Neil Ferguson revised his paper radically and suddenly came to a very different conclusion.

 

Other countries would have seen how much the UK relies on social distancing and no doubt added it to the repertoire because it was seen as another measure, which probably works if the UK relies on it so much.

 

The evidence that social distancing works at all is very flimsy though, and is basically based on influenza pandemics. However the influenza virus is fundamantally different and transmission is different. Transmission with Covid19 is much quicker, because it's asymptomatic, ie by stealth, and because 50% of those infected show no symptoms at all. This means that the speed of the transmission works against social distancing. If it is the case that the UK is approaching 60% of infected then social distancing would make no sense anymore as herd immunity would be close. Not that it made that much sense to start with, as it merely delayed transmission a little bit, due to the speed of Covid19 transmission. That was not known when Ferguson penned his paper.

 

 

So, in a nutshell, Germany have also implemented social distancing. Therefore Germany are also following Ferguson. 

 

This Ferguson chap seems to wield more power and influence over Earthlings than General Zod ????

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AlexRich said:

The Germans got their act together and tested. If they hadn’t they’d be having the same issues as other countries. So far Singapore, Taiwan and South Korea have done likewise, with good results. They all learned the lessons from previous outbreaks like SARS. 

Spot on. As nasty as it was, SARS was a great rehearsal for those countries. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...