Jump to content

Phuket locks down, brings all transport to standstill until April 30


webfact

Recommended Posts

Phuket locks down, brings all transport to standstill until April 30

By The Nation

 

800_2cbcfa95f6c4e71.jpg?v=1585494425

 

Phuket is locking down from Monday (March 30) until April 30 as the number of Covid-19 patients over the country is growing.

 

Phuket Governor Phakkhaphong Thawiphat announced on Sunday that all modes of transport except air would be halted until April 30 in order to prevent the spread of the new coronavirus.

 

Only vehicles that contain necessary supplies such as gas, medical, food and government vehicles are allowed land transportation. Others must seek permission from the Public Health Ministry.

 

As far as water transportation is concerned, ship crew will not be allowed to disembark at ports in Phuket and ships would be allowed to only bring essential supplies.

 

All beaches in Phuket closed indefinitely

 

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-03-30
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can not imagine how this is going to work.  Many foreigners and many more Thais have to get to their other places.  It is fairly easy to enforce.  Only one big airport.  Only one land bridge right?  Sea travel for smaller craft might be a little tougher to enforce.  But I am pretty sure some water travel, over to Myanmar are going to happen, and also some land over towards the south crossings, roads or not

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, AhFarangJa said:

Am I reading this correctly that he is only talking about transport on and off the island. Surely not banning vehicles and motorbikes across the islands roads?

 

Yes, hardly any change with the previous situation.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What strikes me the most.... the SARS epidemic happened in 2003.

And nobody ever bothered to produce a vaccine?

They say it takes a minimum of 1 to 1.5 years for a vaccine to be ready and safe for use for humans. Well, 17 years and no vaccine for SARS??

And with Covid-19 so close to SARS....

If the pharmaceutical industry did their job, we would have never heard of Covid-19.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, brain150 said:

You give somebody unlimited power, you can be sure he will use it !

 

Based on what ? Based on fear of what you don't understand ?

 

The New England Journal of Medicine

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387

This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.

I think the issue is the infection rate rather than the mortality rate. Some of the other viruses you mention had a much higher mortality rate but didn't transmit so easily which is why it was possible to prevent the spread. 

 

Covid 19 Is highly infectious so whilst most who are infected die if you don't try to stop it spreading that small percentage can be a loot of people. The actual mortality rate arms a bit difficult to pin down since you need accurate figures for those infected. Rhett are doubts about the figures from some countries and it's dependant on the extent of testing. More testing will give a lower mortality rate. Most estimates I've seen are 1% or below.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, spiekerjozef said:

What strikes me the most.... the SARS epidemic happened in 2003.

And nobody ever bothered to produce a vaccine?

They say it takes a minimum of 1 to 1.5 years for a vaccine to be ready and safe for use for humans. Well, 17 years and no vaccine for SARS??

And with Covid-19 so close to SARS....

If the pharmaceutical industry did their job, we would have never heard of Covid-19.

From what I can tell it isn't that they didn't bother. There have been some animal tests but they haven't been that successful. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, spiekerjozef said:

What strikes me the most.... the SARS epidemic happened in 2003.

And nobody ever bothered to produce a vaccine?

They say it takes a minimum of 1 to 1.5 years for a vaccine to be ready and safe for use for humans. Well, 17 years and no vaccine for SARS??

And with Covid-19 so close to SARS....

 

You misunderstood...

 

They didn't make a vaccine against SARS... Because they... failed.

 

They tried ! But they failed.

 

So the right question to ask now is : why they continue to BS us by saying that a vaccine against the chinese virus will come soon ?

 

Several answers are possible. But the most obvious is : "to enhance the flow of fundings".

 

Chasing a ghost, forever... Perfect time to milk the cow : "oh yeah it's coming we are working on it"...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, christophe75 said:

We were told that general Prayuth was officially in charge of the fight against the virus.

 

Isn't it ?

 

Thanks to an emergency decree, with broad powers.

 

So how a governor can take, unilaterally, such a hard, insane decision ?

 

A decision that :

-affects directly the life of half of million of people

-affects national security (yes !)

-affects Thailand international image (Phuket is known worldwide !)

 

People will think : "Is Phuket the new Wuhan ? What's going on in Thailand ?"

 

It's a PR disaster.

 

Reminds us how many cases...  do they have in Phuket ?

 

And if Phuket is locked-down why not Bangkok ?

 

Who is in charge ?

 

Where is Prayuth ?

 

It's just mind boggling.

I think we have over the years established that the southern Islands are run by others, I think they are known as "Influential People".

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, spiekerjozef said:

If the pharmaceutical industry did their job, we would have never heard of Covid-19.

From what I understand COVID-19 leaked from labs that were doing exactly that.

http://www.asianews.it/news-en/The-hypothesis-of-coronavirus-originating-from-a-laboratory-in-Wuhan-is-plausible-49550.html

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, brain150 said:

You give somebody unlimited power, you can be sure he will use it !

 

Based on what ? Based on fear of what you don't understand ?

 

The New England Journal of Medicine

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2002387

This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively.

 

If the U.S. ends up with just a 1% mortality rate from COVID, that's 3 million people dead. Do the same math for other countries... Your percentage numbers sound small, but they translate into masses of dead bodies.  Over the weekend, one of the top U.S. doctors predicted 100,000 to 200,000 deaths in the U.S.

 

200,000 would be equal to about half of all U.S. military deaths from the entirety of World War II.

 

 

 

Edited by TallGuyJohninBKK
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

 

If the U.S. ends up with just a 1% mortality rate from COVID, that's 3 million people dead. Do the same math for other countries... Your percentage numbers sound small, but they translate into masses of dead bodies.  Over the weekend, one of the top U.S. doctors predicted 100,000 to 200,000 deaths in the U.S.

 

 

Yes my take is that the real mortality rate is somewhere between .5 and 2 percent with a lot of variables including the capacity of health care systems. However the total deaths can be greatly reduced by limiting the percentage of people that are infected as we wait for a vaccine which realistically won't probably happen before 18 months. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Phuketshrew said:

It would seem that the number of positive COVID-19 cases may be far higher than they are officially reporting.

Obviously! 

Testing here has been very limited. 

More testing means more cases revealed in Thailand and everywhere. 

Thailand was the most popular destination for Chinese tourists from Wuhan by far before travel restrictions. 

Also in countries that have done massive testing its been discovered that about half of positives have no symptoms whatsoever. But they are still infectious. Do the math. 

Edited by Jingthing
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, christophe75 said:

We were told that general Prayuth was officially in charge of the fight against the virus.

 

Isn't it ?

 

Thanks to an emergency decree, with broad powers.

 

So how a governor can take, unilaterally, such a hard, insane decision ?

 

A decision that :

-affects directly the life of half of million of people

-affects national security (yes !)

-affects Thailand international image (Phuket is known worldwide !)

 

People will think : "Is Phuket the new Wuhan ? What's going on in Thailand ?"

 

It's a PR disaster.

 

Reminds us how many cases...  do they have in Phuket ?

 

And if Phuket is locked-down why not Bangkok ?

 

Who is in charge ?

 

Where is Prayuth ?

 

It's just mind boggling.

Perhaps your last two questions provide the answer.

 

Where is Prayuth? Since he declared himself to be in charge I don't think we've heard from him.

 

Trump, Johnson (despite having the virus) and other leaders are on TV day after day and whether you agree with their approaches or not this is important in order to show strong leadership. So Ill say it again: "Where is Prayuth?"

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, spiekerjozef said:

What strikes me the most.... the SARS epidemic happened in 2003.

And nobody ever bothered to produce a vaccine?

They say it takes a minimum of 1 to 1.5 years for a vaccine to be ready and safe for use for humans. Well, 17 years and no vaccine for SARS??

And with Covid-19 so close to SARS....

If the pharmaceutical industry did their job, we would have never heard of Covid-19.

I guess you missed the memo on coronavirus variants and strains. Even the 'common' annual flu vaccination is 'adjusted' yearly to counter the strain that's predicted by ongoing research to be most prevalent during the coming flu season.

 

Influenza isn't the same as SARS which isn't the same as MERS which isn't the same as Covid-19 which won't be the same as the next one.

 

PS: This is the same response to the same comment you already posted on another thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Puwa said:

There have been many different studies - I guess it depends who you believe in the end ????

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, christophe75 said:

They didn't make a vaccine against SARS... Because they... failed.

They stranded because they literally ran out of test subjects. SARS1 simply disappeared on its own. It's hard to develop and test a vaccine for a virus that's not around anymore.

 

5 hours ago, christophe75 said:

So the right question to ask now is : why they continue to BS us by saying that a vaccine against the chinese virus will come soon ?

Who says it's coming soon? It's a long-term goal. Sure you can probably find some politocian who claims a vaccine is around the corner but that's not 'they'. Every sane person knows it's going to take years and it might not happen at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Phuketshrew said:

There have been many different studies - I guess it depends who you believe in the end ????

It is very obvious where and how it started. Only conspiracy theories point to labs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, AhFarangJa said:

Am I reading this correctly that he is only talking about transport on and off the island. Surely not banning vehicles and motorbikes across the islands roads?

 

Yes- I reported the headline as being mis-leading but nothing has been done about it. third paragraph contradicts the headline as it makes it clear that essential transport continues on and off the island.

 

All traffic is NOT at a standstill. 

Edited by Psimbo
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...