Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

U.S. Navy does not rule out punishing captain who criticized coronavirus response

Recommended Posts

U.S. Navy does not rule out punishing captain who criticized coronavirus response

By Idrees Ali and Phil Stewart

 

2020-04-01T185754Z_1_LYNXMPEG304S0_RTROPTP_4_HEALTH-CORONAVIRUS-USA-NAVY.JPG

FILE PHOTO: The USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) is seen while entering into the port in Da Nang, Vietnam, March 5, 2020. REUTERS/Kham

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Navy on Wednesday did not rule out punishing the captain of the aircraft carrier Theodore Roosevelt, who wrote a scathing letter to Navy leadership asking for stronger measures to stop the spread of the coronavirus.

 

In a four-page letter, the contents of which were confirmed by U.S. officials to Reuters on Tuesday, Captain Brett Crozier described a bleak situation onboard the nuclear-powered carrier as more sailors tested positive for the virus.

 

Sailors and their families have expressed anxiety and frustration.

 

The letter put the Pentagon on the defensive about whether it was doing enough to keep service members safe and alarmed the families of those aboard the ship. Its home port is San Diego, California.

 

"I don't know who leaked the letter to the media. That would be something that would violate the principles of good order and discipline, if he were responsible for that. But I don't know that," Acting U.S. Navy Secretary Thomas Modly said when asked multiple times if the captain would be punished.

 

"The fact that he wrote the letter up to his chain of command to express his concerns would absolutely not result in any type of retaliation," Modly said.

 

In the letter, the captain called for "decisive action" - removing over 4,000 sailors from the ship and isolating them. He said that if the Navy did not act now, it would be failing to properly safeguard "our most trusted asset - our sailors."

 

"It's disappointing to hear him say that. However, at the same time, I know that that's not the truth," Modly said, adding that he did not agree with the captain that all but 10 percent of the ship's crew could be removed.

 

The carrier was in the Pacific when the Navy reported its first coronavirus case a week ago. It has since pulled into port in Guam, a U.S. island territory in the western Pacific.

 

About 1,000 personnel have been taken off from the ship so far and that number will rise to 2,700 in the next few days. So far 93 personnel on the ship have tested positive.

 

"This ship has weapons on it. It has munitions on it... It requires a certain number of people on that ship to maintain the safety and security of the ship," he added.

 

'I FEEL HELPLESS'

As coronavirus has spread, frustration has grown over the Navy's speed in dealing with the crisis, a sailor onboard the Theodore Roosevelt told Reuters, adding that on Wednesday the Navy communicated a satisfactory plan to those on the ship.

 

"Why does it seem that our (commanding officer) is begging the Navy to take care of us and keep us safe and higher ups don't seem to be quickly making a good plan for us?," said the sailor, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

 

Over the past few days, there have been messages of concern from family members on social media.

 

"As a mother I feel helpless... I was able to speak to my son earlier, but he has no idea what is going on or where he is going," Barbara Muniz, who said her son is on the ship, wrote on the carrier's Facebook page.

 

On Monday, Dee Ronmar wrote that her son was on the ship and she did not understand why the carrier was allowed to make a port visit in Vietnam last month.

 

"How come more safety precautions weren't taken to ensure no contractions, minimizing the spread, when you all docked a few weeks ago?," Ronmar wrote.

 

During the briefing, Master Chief Petty Officer of the Navy Russell Smith said that "morale does seem high" on the ship.

 

(Reporting by Idrees Ali and Phil Stewart; Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-04-02
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
  • Sad 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, ezzra said:

The question that needed to be asked is how this virus find its way to ships on the high seas like warships and dozens of cruising boats seemingly isolated from land's investments? was it some kind of time delayed trojan horse virus?...

 

per the article:

 

3 hours ago, webfact said:

On Monday, Dee Ronmar wrote that her son was on the ship and she did not understand why the carrier was allowed to make a port visit in Vietnam last month.

"How come more safety precautions weren't taken to ensure no contractions, minimizing the spread, when you all docked a few weeks ago?," Ronmar wrote.

appears to be a normal port call, no mention that her son wrote they made port but were unable to enjoy liberty.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Nyezhov said:

Typical Reuters article, full of agenda ridden opinion. If it was allowed here, I would rewrite it to ensure it is factually accurate and in accordance with journalistic standards, then post it here so you could also see.

 

But hey, he went through the chain of command. Leaking the letter though? Violation of military discipline.

 

did he?  had read he sent the letter directly to the pentagon, bypassing the normal chain of command.   the wording used by modly quoted below seems odd.   "up to" his chain of command?  could be a simple slip, could have been misheard by a reporter.  sounds deceptive coming from a(n acting) navy secretary.

 

3 hours ago, webfact said:

"The fact that he wrote the letter up to his chain of command to express his concerns would absolutely not result in any type of retaliation," Modly said.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, ChouDoufu said:

had read he sent the letter directly to the pentagon, bypassing the normal chain of command

That is rather common in history and sometimes  the bypasser is proved right, viz Emile Driants complaints about Joffres policy vis a vis Verdun in the famous letter to Gallieni in December 1915.

 

Other times its just ego driven. Look at MacCarthur.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...