Jump to content

Wuhan market had role in virus outbreak, but more research needed - WHO


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, lkv said:

But here, we have a small inconsistency

 

https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/27-04-2020-who-timeline---covid-19

 

14 January 2020

WHO's technical lead for the response noted in a press briefing there may have been limited human-to-human transmission of the coronavirus (in the 41 confirmed cases), mainly through family members, and that there was a risk of a possible wider outbreak. The lead also said that human-to-human transmission would not be surprising given our experience with SARS, MERS and other respiratory pathogens.  

Thanks for the precision. "May have been" is the official statement. Scientists are always careful when they are confronted with only limited information. 

Anyway, they did not state " no H2H transmission", right?

Edited by candide
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh yeah. It was posted for "balance".

 

An infamous WHO tweet saying there was 'no clear evidence' COVID-19 could spread between humans was posted for 'balance' to reflect findings from China

 

Nobody understands anymore, yes?? ????

https://www.businessinsider.com/who-no-transmission-coronavirus-tweet-was-to-appease-china-guardian-2020-4

"The tweet was posted because an official worried that a WHO expert was issuing strong warnings that deviated from China's messaging."

 

Edited by lkv
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, lkv said:

Oh yeah. It was posted for "balance".

 

An infamous WHO tweet saying there was 'no clear evidence' COVID-19 could spread between humans was posted for 'balance' to reflect findings from China

 

Nobody understands anymore, yes?? ????

https://www.businessinsider.com/who-no-transmission-coronavirus-tweet-was-to-appease-china-guardian-2020-4

Interesting article. Thanks. Obviously there was no unanimous opinion at that time among scientist working at WHO.

 

The Guardian article cited in the article you linked is also interesting.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/18/caught-in-a-superpower-struggle-the-inside-story-of-the-whos-response-to-coronavirus

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

Interesting you brought up the 1918 pandemic. 50,000,000 people died. No shut down.

Perhaps they didn,t know how the flu was transmitted 102 years ago,I do believe medical research has progressed a tad since then,though you might find it hard to believe.

  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, lkv said:

 

I have another one.

 

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8843dz/heres-how-china-is-rewriting-the-history-of-the-coronavirus-pandemic-to-make-itself-the-hero

 

This is how China is rewriting history.

 

"In essence, the party wants to make the best out of a terrible situation and spin the story in favor of the party by deflecting blame, sowing doubts on its culpability, whipping up nationalism, and highlighting the superiority of the Chinese party-state,”

Damn clever those chinese.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kingdong said:

Perhaps they didn,t know how the flu was transmitted 102 years ago,I do believe medical research has progressed a tad since then,though you might find it hard to believe.

"Perhaps"... or perhaps not.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ukrules said:

People seem to think the 1918 flu originated from the US, the Chinese did a great job of covering up here and even if you now go looking on google you won't find much if you search for '1918 flu China' and there's a reason for that.

There is a theory that the'Spanish Flu' was bought to Europe by the Chinese labour companies recruited and organised by the British from the various treaty ports which they controlled..ie Hong Kong and Shanghai.

There was no organised Central Nationalist goverment in China at the time as it had descended into chronic 'warlordism'-a situation which was actively encouraged by the Western Powers and Japan.

 

There is no evidence to suggest that Chinese authorities covered up anything at the time as they had no means to do so.

 

This theory of origin remains just that-a well discussed theory and there has been no attempts to cover it up or down play it.Of course,there are several other possible sources discussed as well. 

That's History for you.

Edited by Odysseus123
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, candide said:

Surprisingly enough, I discovered that bats are considered as a gourmet dish in several countries, including until recently in Italy. ????

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bat_as_food

Well, when McDonald was introduced in France .. That was considered 'barbaric' ....  Now McDo is very popular in France ... 555

 

Opinions do change..

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is one thing for sure and that is there are many questions to be ask. One question is what does Donald Trump and his second in command Pompeo know about this? What do they know about the lab that was set up and financed in Wuhan in 2014 by the American National Institute of Health under Barack Obama? Do they know that this lab was set up to research the coronavirus? Do they also know that the reason that this lab was set up in China was because it was illegal to carry out such research on American soil in case of accidents? Did Donald Trump cut finances to this lab the same as he has cut the finances to every other health scheme that Barack Obama set up? Is the cutting of the financial support to this lab the reason that the virus has been able to escape? Where did this virus originate, the Wuhan wet market or the American lab in Wuhan?  Here is a interesting link for you to look at.

https://projectreporter.nih.gov/project_info_description.cfm?aid=8674931&icde=49588715

This lab never had anything to do with the Chinese Government.

Edited by Russell17au
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Retarded said:

So pangolin has nothing to do with virus? 

Pangolin wouldn't be happy to hear that.

Is pangolin also the plural of pangolin?  And if it is, what's the collective noun for a group of pangolin?   Let's forget this virus nonsense and address these really important questions.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, lkv said:

 

I have another one.

 

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/8843dz/heres-how-china-is-rewriting-the-history-of-the-coronavirus-pandemic-to-make-itself-the-hero

 

This is how China is rewriting history.

 

"In essence, the party wants to make the best out of a terrible situation and spin the story in favor of the party by deflecting blame, sowing doubts on its culpability, whipping up nationalism, and highlighting the superiority of the Chinese party-state,”

Don't worry they can fool their own people but not the rest of the World.
I wonder why they are so gullible.
There's even been a massive propaganda campaign going on trying to convince Asian countries the outbreak started in the USA.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

Chinese authorities shut down the market in January as part of efforts to halt the spread of the virus and ordered a temporary ban on trade and consumption of wildlife.

And Thailand started to do something when, still taking CNY tourists from Wuhan in February?

Thailand got off lightly considering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Russell17au said:

And what gives you the right to declare what other people eat is barbaric? Are you one of these vegan idiots

Bats are Nr.1 disease carrier carrying up to 60 Viruses that can infect Humans so if we eat them there's a good chance to get infected

imagine at the wet Market where they are chopped up on all that Bat blood get splashed around. There are of course other animals that can

pass disease to Humans and it make logical sense to ban the sale of those Animals for consumption I would say.

https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/why-bats-are-breeding-grounds-for-deadly-diseases-like-ebola-and-sars

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, DirtyHarry55 said:

Bats are Nr.1 disease carrier carrying up to 60 Viruses that can infect Humans so if we eat them there's a good chance to get infected

imagine at the wet Market where they are chopped up on all that Bat blood get splashed around. There are of course other animals that can

pass disease to Humans and it make logical sense to ban the sale of those Animals for consumption I would say.

https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/why-bats-are-breeding-grounds-for-deadly-diseases-like-ebola-and-sars

What do you eat here in Thailand? That is if you are here. What do the Isaan farmers eat? and you can buy these animals at wet markets.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Russell17au said:

What do you eat here in Thailand? That is if you are here. What do the Isaan farmers eat? and you can buy these animals at wet markets.

Loads of stuff pig, chicken lots of fish and Seafood the occasional bug etc but definitely not Bats as it's well known they carry disease including Rabies and more.
Personally I have never seen Bat meet for sale in Thailand, have you? Field Rats yes, Frog Meet yes, Bats no.
If you do eat Bats at least be informed of the Risks of contracting diseases.

https://www.nature.com/articles/216384a0

Edited by DirtyHarry55
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ukrules said:

If you dig a little deeper there were plenty of shutdowns back then. Not like today but they were there.

 

There were also some serious mistakes from which we may be able to learn. San Francisco springs to mind - third wave in 1919

Maybe if they had the same shutdowns there wouldnt have been so many deaths. Also finding info back then was not as fast and easy as it is now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...