Jump to content
BANGKOK
webfact

U.S. savages WHO as it promises pandemic review, but China pledges $2 billion

Recommended Posts

24 minutes ago, Krataiboy said:

Trashing the US economy, which Trump is rightly reluctant to do, would cost far more deaths than the glorified flu epidemic which caused the WHO to get their knickers in such a twist.

Then why did trump close down businesses.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Rest of the world lead by WHO are moving along well without USA. They are working and collaborating on helping poorer countries like Africa with medical aids and equipment. They care less for Trump’s political agenda and laugh at his 30 days demand for change. Under WHO, more vaccines are being developed by combining the talents of countries and some of the candidate vaccines are moving to phase 2 soon. China will soon developed a drug for treatment and immunity. By distancing US from global collaboration, Trump has disadvantage his own people from getting the best health care. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Dap said:

No one is going to argue with a $2 Billion donation!

but that's exactly what trump is claiming!

 

our assessed fees are 5x china's (two years in arrears), plus we donate an additional 400 million per year, yet trump is claiming somehow that the who is "china-centric."

 

now the claim is that china paying their dues (on time), paying our dues (on time), and now making approximately the same donation is a bribe and puts the who in china's back pocket.

 

wouldn't our major payments mean they were, as trump phrased it in his letter, "serving america's interests"?

 

propaganda is confusing sometimes.

 

 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sujo said:

Then why did trump close down businesses.

He hasn't. Blame panicky state governors like New York's Cuomo.

  • Thanks 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 

 

3 hours ago, Krataiboy said:

If Trump is smart, he won't waste another cent backing of a UN agency clearly in the pockets of the Chinese and messianic vaccines "king" Bill Gates.

 

One can only speculate how many lives were lost as a result of the WHO'S rash public endorsement of China's initial claim that the COVID virus could not be spread by human transmission.

 

 

 

 

when did china claim "COVID virus was not spread by human transmission."

 

there have been so many articles and reports, i can't seem to find that.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So WHO are going to investigate COVID - focusing on the role of China and WHO after being given US$2BN from China?

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, pedro01 said:

So WHO are going to investigate COVID - focusing on the role of China and WHO after being given US$2BN from China?

would you prefer they investigate after the who is given US$2BN from the usa?

 

oh.

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, pedro01 said:

So WHO are going to investigate COVID - focusing on the role of China and WHO after being given US$2BN from China?

trump's lack of international leadership and leanings to isolationism have provided openings for further Chinese influence. trump didn't address the WHO conference on the proposed Covid investigation, no surprise China took the lead.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, ChouDoufu said:

 

 

when did china claim "COVID virus was not spread by human transmission."

 

there have been so many articles and reports, i can't seem to find that.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/who-trashed-for-sharing-chinese-study-claiming-humans-cant-spread-coronavirus-during-outbreaks-onset

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
51 minutes ago, Krataiboy said:

hahaha!  that old twoot again?  haven't we been over this before?  we'll ignore the report of limited transmission announced during their press briefing the very same day, making this twattering meaningless. 

 

please read your claim and compare to the actual quote from within the article below:

 

you stated:  "China's initial claim that the COVID virus could not be spread by human transmission. "

 

from your link:  "Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in Wuhan, China," the organization tweeted on Jan. 14.

 

it's usually a good idea to read the entire article, not just skim the headline, as oftentimes the editors take liberties when monetizing the clickbait headers.

 

 

Edited by ChouDoufu
  • Like 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, ChouDoufu said:

but that's exactly what trump is claiming!

 

our assessed fees are 5x china's (two years in arrears), plus we donate an additional 400 million per year, yet trump is claiming somehow that the who is "china-centric."

 

now the claim is that china paying their dues (on time), paying our dues (on time), and now making approximately the same donation is a bribe and puts the who in china's back pocket.

 

wouldn't our major payments mean they were, as trump phrased it in his letter, "serving america's interests"?

 

propaganda is confusing sometimes.

 

 

What I meant but failed to state clearly enough was that the WHO is not going to complain whatsoever where the $2 Billion comes from and China (meanwhile) comes out smelling like a rose.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, ChouDoufu said:

hahaha!  that old twoot again?  haven't we been over this before?  we'll ignore the report of limited transmission announced during their press briefing the very same day, making this twattering meaningless. 

 

please read your claim and compare to the actual quote from within the article below:

 

you stated:  "China's initial claim that the COVID virus could not be spread by human transmission. "

 

from your link:  "Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in Wuhan, China," the organization tweeted on Jan. 14.

 

it's usually a good idea to read the entire article, not just skim the headline, as oftentimes the editors take liberties when monetizing the clickbait headers.

 

 

Pointless hair-splitting.

  • Thanks 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Krataiboy said:

Pointless hair-splitting.

pointless?  splitting of hairs?  it's the difference between visiting your friendly local physician for a covid19 test about a feeling you might have had the virus already, and being told either:

 

1)  from the symptoms you describe having last fall, i suspect you may have been exposed to an early strain of the new coronavirus.  your tests, however, came back negative.  your blood contains no antibodies, and there are no signs of lung damage.  you have some liver damage, a potential sign of covid infection, but also could be related to your excessive drinking.   so there is no clear evidence of infection. 

 

2)  no, you did not have covid 19.

 

not pointless.  it's the difference between reading for comprehension and reading for confirmation bias.

  • Thanks 1
  • Confused 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/20/2020 at 5:09 PM, Krataiboy said:

He hasn't. Blame panicky state governors like New York's Cuomo.

Panicky? There's nearly 29,000 dead bodies in New York, and over 366,000 infected. You could bet that would be many magnitudes higher without the shut downs.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...