Jump to content
BANGKOK
rooster59

Drug touted by Trump to treat COVID-19 linked to higher death risk - study

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I think he should increase his dose.

Edited by 4MyEgo
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, GalaxyMan said:

The BBC has an article that specifically states that your chances of dying are higher if you're given that drug.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-52779309

I see the BBC is getting in on the anti-Trump agenda too. The drug been around for 65 years, when Trump was 8 years old. The BBC need a piece of him too. The article is not worth reading due to its obvious political bias. I don't read or view anything from CNN and some others, so I now have to add BBC to the list.

 

BBC should focus on their own domestic Covid-19 disaster - currently the worst in the world.

Edited by tropo
  • Thanks 2
  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

I'm pretty sure that if Trump was using a drug that did cure Corona it wouldn't be as well publicised as when he uses one that apparently doesn't.

If Trump could really cure Corona by miracles his detractors would say it was it was faked. Doesn't matter what he does; in the eyes of some he's always wrong, PERIOD.

Once again an argument based on something that hasn’t happened.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
22 minutes ago, tropo said:

Surprise, surprise... More crazy talk from Trump haters...

 

Do you think Trump woke up one day and decided hydroxychloroquine would help people with covid-19 infections.

How do you actually know that he is taking it ?

 

Have you seen him drop some of these tablets, or could it be that he is using his words to get his guinea pigs to try it, if it doesn't work, well I am sure he will say, it works fine on him.

 

Just remember this guy knew what was coming around the corner when he said it was nothing more than a flu, then later he flipped and said, yeh, I knew it was bad, but I was just trying to be a cheerleader because I didn't want people to panic.

 

In my opinion, people look at leaders with the titles as President or Prime Ministers as some kind of saviours, personally, they are nothing more that real estate agents wearing suits, oh that's right Humpty Trumpty has a background in that doesn't he.

 

Everyone should do their own research, and think outside the square, especially doctors.

Edited by 4MyEgo
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
39 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

I think he should increase his dose.

I think you need a vaccine trial ...

 

.

 

.

 

Bio-wars!

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
41 minutes ago, tropo said:

I see the BBC is getting in on the anti-Trump agenda too. The drug been around for 65 years, when Trump was 8 years old. The BBC need a piece of him too. The article is not worth reading due to its obvious political bias. I don't read or view anything from CNN and some others, so I now have to add BBC to the list.

 

BBC should focus on their own domestic Covid-19 disaster - currently the worst in the world.

You have identified something as anti Trump, but you’ve identified the wrong thing.

 

The bit that is ‘anti-Trump’ is the reporting of facts and truth.

 

Truth and facts are always going to be anti-Trump.

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, rabas said:

I think you need a vaccine trial ...

 

.

 

.

 

Bio-wars!

 

I'll have mine, straight after yours.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Please explain why they should not report on research that indicates a medicine that worldwide and in the UK many people are taking against an illness is not working against that illness but may be negative.

They should report on it. Nothing wrong with that. It's their obvious bias in the headline that is off putting. I won't read a report with such a headline. I hope you enjoyed it. This thread headline talks about a drug touted by Trump.... BBC took it a step further by calling it a "Trump Drug".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

You have identified something as anti Trump, but you’ve identified the wrong thing.

 

The bit that is ‘anti-Trump’ is the reporting of facts and truth.

 

Truth and facts are always going to be anti-Trump.

 

 

It depends on what truth and facts you are using to make your point... who's going to fact check the "facts"?... or if someone calls it the truth, it must be so? Everything that comes out of the mouth of a Democrat is suspect. They need to win - they are desperate - they have a very good incentive to lie about anything and everything.

Edited by tropo
  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, rabas said:

But granted, it's complicated.  SARS-CoV-2 may be different in ways that are not yet understood.

Certainly not understood by Trump. Or is he touting the drug for personal financial gain?

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...