Jump to content

Drug touted by Trump to treat COVID-19 linked to higher death risk - study


Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, ChouDoufu said:

Do I think Trump woke up one day and decided hydroxychloroquine would help people with covid-19 infections?

 

yes.  that is exactly what i believe to be the case. 

 

i suspect he read some mention of the drug on the ticker at the bottom of the screen during fox&friends, and it stuck in his head.  i suspect he went with it, because it's the longest drug name he'd heard so far, so it must be tremendously great.  i suspect during briefings with his experts for the next week, his response to every subject was to inquire about chlor-aquine.  i suspect it aroused a tremendous interest in clor-ox, and other great disinfectants.  and finally, i suspect that is the reason why, on national television, he directed the "experts" to "look into" disinfecting the lungs, like with a cleaning.

Fair enough. I would expect such a belief from an adamant Trump-hater. You have many friends on this forum that will back you up.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 213
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Exactly, factual reporting of research.

this article is misleading    It deals specifically with those already infected and severely ill with CV-19 and shows that it offers nothing towards fighting the disease and puts patients al

Surprise, surprise... More crazy talk from Trump haters...   Do you think Trump woke up one day and decided hydroxychloroquine would help people with covid-19 infections.   ALL of

Posted Images

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, tropo said:

They should report on it. Nothing wrong with that. It's their obvious bias in the headline that is off putting. I won't read a report with such a headline. I hope you enjoyed it. This thread headline talks about a drug touted by Trump.... BBC took it a step further by calling it a "Trump Drug".

It’s the ‘Trump Drug’ because Trump endorsed it from the WH.

 

And quite frankly, if it were not the ‘Trump Drug’ you and the other Trump supporting members here would not be going out of your way to defend it against ever mounting scientific evidence that it is ineffective agains COVID-19 and dangerous.

 

 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, 4MyEgo said:

How do you actually know that he is taking it ?

 

Have you seen him drop some of these tablets, or could it be that he is using his words to get his guinea pigs to try it, if it doesn't work, well I am sure he will say, it works fine on him.

 

Just remember this guy knew what was coming around the corner when he said it was nothing more than a flu, then later he flipped and said, yeh, I knew it was bad, but I was just trying to be a cheerleader because I didn't want people to panic.

 

In my opinion, people look at leaders with the titles as President or Prime Ministers as some kind of saviours, personally, they are nothing more that real estate agents wearing suits, oh that's right Humpty Trumpty has a background in that doesn't he.

 

Everyone should do their own research, and think outside the square, especially doctors.

For 4 years there has been an agenda to remove Trump - before he took office. Just using adjectives such as "humpty Trumpty" puts you straight into the box. If you'd said that earlier in your speech I could have saved time and stopped reading.

  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, tropo said:

They should report on it. Nothing wrong with that. It's their obvious bias in the headline that is off putting. I won't read a report with such a headline. I hope you enjoyed it. This thread headline talks about a drug touted by Trump.... BBC took it a step further by calling it a "Trump Drug".

"Trump, Medic-in-Chief".... better so?

Edited by Opl
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

Did you manage to keep a straight face when typing 'ALL of his information comes from a distinguished team of experts in all fields of medicine. He hears from the best of the best and has them at his fingertips'?

I'm not sure what specific experts you are refering to but as far as every other expert is concerned, this drug is unproven at best, downright lethal at worse. 

 

P.S. Love your avatar. That's exactly how I picture you

How straight was your face when you dished up that other nonsense? You have your opinion, I have mine... There are 2 sides here, and we shall disagree.

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, tropo said:

For 4 years there has been an agenda to remove Trump - before he took office. Just using adjectives such as "humpty Trumpty" puts you straight into the box. If you'd said that earlier in your speech I could have saved time and stopped reading.

It’s an election year, to remove any doubt, I’m fully on board the effort to remove Trump.

 

I do however agree with you on the name calling bit, though I note it is a central plank in Trump’s own abusive comments to those he fears.

 

I myself take the view that Donald Trump, his name, his politics and his behavior is already an insult to decency, there is no need to alter his name or add anything to it. 

Edited by Chomper Higgot
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, tropo said:

For 4 years there has been an agenda to remove Trump - before he took office. Just using adjectives such as "humpty Trumpty" puts you straight into the box. If you'd said that earlier in your speech I could have saved time and stopped reading.

using that logic, slightly more than half the country can save time and ignore anything trump says.

 

why should the opposition care what trump says about "sleepy joe" or "crooked hillary", and why should any other member of the united nations be concerned about what trump has to say about "lil rocketman" and others.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Chomper Higgot said:

It’s an election year, to remove any doubt, I fully on board the effort to remove Trump.

 

I do however agree with you on the name calling bit, though I note it is a central plank in Trump’s own abusive comments to those he fears.

 

I myself take the view that Donald Trump, his name, his politics and his behavior is already an insult to decency, there is no need to alter his name or add anything to it. 

Thank you for confirming the information that was clear from your submission. Are you here to convince Trump supporters of something, or just here to vent?

Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, ChouDoufu said:

using that logic, slightly more than half the country can save time and ignore anything trump says.

 

why should the opposition care what trump says about "sleepy joe" or "crooked hillary", and why should any other member of the united nations be concerned about what trump has to say about "lil rocketman" and others.

I don't find it too difficult to leave out the name calling. In fact, it's one thing about Trump I really dislike. There are many other things too. Just because you support one of two parties doesn't mean you need to be onboard with everything they do or say. Both sides are imperfect and all we can do is choose the one that we THINK will do less harm.

Edited by tropo
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Phil McCaverty said:

To a Trump supporter. Daily proving him to be a liar, snake oil salesman and mentally challenged. Very annoying.

OK, so the take away here is that you don't like Trump and his supporters, and I don't agree with most of what Trump haters say. So what? We are constantly annoyed at each other, and this sentiment is pervasive through the whole community. It's never going to change and shortly I will take a vacation from this thread and leave all the Trump haters alone so they can pat each other's backs and hate... I broke my rules by commenting in a politically charged thread. My bad.

 

BTW, I'm an Australian. LOLOL. I look at this from an outsider's perspective.

Edited by tropo
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, tropo said:

I don't find it too difficult to leave out the name calling. In fact, it's one thing about Trump I really dislike. There are many other things too. Just because you support one of two parties doesn't mean you need to be onboard with everything they do or say. Both sides are imperfect and all we can do is choose the one that we THINK will do the less harm.

some don't support either party.

 

i do agree, sometimes you choose the one that you THINK, at the time, is the lesser of two evils.  for that reason, i checked the box next to "trump" last election.  i was sadly misteaken.

 

and for that very reason, i must check the box marked "not trump" next election.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Bender Rodriguez said:

typical big pharma studies to kill a product they cannot make big profits from and to push their miracle vaccine that does not exits but will make one company an instant TRILLION dollar business

 

Bill gates "saved" one company that never made vaccinations

they are skipping all basic animal trials

 

compare to hydroxychloroquine

 

1 pil is active in the body for 21 days 

 

but for the study:

 

how old were the patients ?

how many mg hydroxychloroquine was giving per day ?

how sick were the patients before getting it ? already on ventilator = marked TO DIE !

did patients have other chronic conditions ?

 

 

so, why does the government not pay for a study, outside BIG PHARMA's greedy reach into studies to see if works or not 

 

 

Hydrocloroquine, is manufactured and touted by big pharma and they are hoping to make vast amounts of money from it. Why do you think Trump is touting it?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, tropo said:

They should report on it. Nothing wrong with that. It's their obvious bias in the headline that is off putting. I won't read a report with such a headline. I hope you enjoyed it. This thread headline talks about a drug touted by Trump.... BBC took it a step further by calling it a "Trump Drug".

Also the headline is plain factual.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...