Jump to content
BANGKOK
Logosone

JP Morgan study shows lockdowns did not alter course of pandemic

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, Moonlover said:

 

Oh is it? 🥱

Yes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

1. Most prefer to err on the safe side

2. It is easy to be general after the battle

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Logosone said:

said governments had been spooked by 'flawed scientific papers'

Reminds me of the climate change nonsense way back in 2019.  Haven't heard a word about climate change for eleven weeks now which is nice.  

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Trump: The Invisible Virus.

 

CNN: Trump is trying to do GOD's work.

 

Humans Indoors: Oceans clear, Smog Gone, Animals, Mammals, Birds Everywhere.

 

I suggest Walking, Bicycling, Skate boarding in the Sun.

 

Have kindness and compassion for all creation including Animals, Mammals & Birds.

 

Pick up garbage in the oceans, beaches on land.

 

Donate to Soi Dog Foundation and volunteer if living in Thailand or take one of the Dogs since they are having trouble with shipping overseas.

 

Change to a plant based diet.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, nauseus said:

It is remarkable, isn't it, you might actually believe the  rubbish you post.

 

Of course the vast majority of countries had decreased infection rates after lockdowns were lifted - because of the preceding lockdowns. Duh!

Actually, the data shows the virus was on the decline before lockdowns.  

 

But hey, never miss a chance to throw in a comment after the fact.

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Logosone said:

It is remarkable, isn't it, that all the lockdown fanatics would have you believe that lockdowns were so crucial in controlling the virus, and then it turns out that, well, actually, 'the vast majority of countries had decreased infection rates' after lockdowns were lifted'.

 

So lockdowns not so crucial after all then. Despite all the earnest hysteria.

 

 

Rubbish

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, White Christmas13 said:

Rubbish

Please elaborate on your post as currently just saying "rubbish" only shows your post is rubbish.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, steelepulse said:

Please elaborate on your post as currently just saying "rubbish" only shows your post is rubbish.

Is that so? I was replying to the OP who said lock downs don't make any different

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, White Christmas13 said:

Is that so? I was replying to the OP who said lock downs don't make any different

Actually your reply was to the below.   Do you still stand behind your ill informed data?

 

 

 

 

It is remarkable, isn't it, that all the lockdown fanatics would have you believe that lockdowns were so crucial in controlling the virus, and then it turns out that, well, actually, 'the vast majority of countries had decreased infection rates' after lockdowns were lifted'.

 

So lockdowns not so crucial after all then. Despite all the earnest hysteria.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...