Jump to content
BANGKOK
rooster59

UK says PM's adviser did not break lockdown rules with 400 km drive

Recommended Posts

starmer and his labour loonys are not happy as they wanted some real muckraking ,but theyve been shut down fast

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, tribalfusion001 said:

More fudging the issue from Boris. He can't dump him as he is the brains behind the bluffing. This will rumble on, it makes a mockery of the so called "lockdown".

the alternative of a labour gumment is so terrfying bojo will ride it out and get returned again and again

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This whole fuss is just remainers' revenge for him getting Brexit done.

As though other politicians haven't done a lot worse in other matters and not kept their jobs.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not everyone is taking it seriously 🤣

 

  • Haha 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, 7by7 said:

 

I said before that Cummings' sister could have used the 'special circumstances' excuse to come to London and collect the child. That was based upon memory and having now checked the guidance I admit was wrong on that point .

 

 

 

 

Apology accepted, would have been respectful to acknowledge it on my post though.

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, vinny41 said:

Posted only once and it's not down to you to decide if Cummings should ask his sister to come to London or not 

The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) (England) Regulations 2020

Restrictions on movement

 During the emergency period, no person may leave [F1or be outside of] the place where they are living without reasonable excuse.

As per Deputy Chief Medical Officer's Dr Wakefield statment in March

 For the purposes of paragraph (1), a reasonable excuse includes the need—

to provide care or assistance, including relevant personal care within the meaning of paragraph 7(3B) of Schedule 4 to the Safeguarding of Vulnerable Groups Act 2006 F7, to a vulnerable person, or to provide emergency assistance;

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/350/regulation/6

Why are you omitting one of the following sentences, that clearly state how he should have handled? According to the law this was clearly not a reasonable excuse.

 

You're defending the indefensible, just admit you don't care in Cummings' case.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Why are you omitting one of the following sentences, that clearly state how he should have handled? According to the law this was clearly not a reasonable excuse.

 

You're defending the indefensible, just admit you don't care in Cummings' case.

The reasonable excuses listed in Regulation 6 of the coronavirus Health Protection Regulations for England, as they stood at the time, are inclusive, not exclusive. The sole issue in the case of Mr Cummings is whether what he and his wife did, in the circumstances as they existed when they drove to Co Durham, amounted to “a reasonable excuse”.That is a matter of opinion, not of law. Only a court can determine that: not a QC, nor Alastair Campbell, nor Uncle Tom Cobbleigh

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/opinion/2020/05/24/letters-law-behaviour-dominic-cummings-going-durham/

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

reasonable excuse : countryside 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...