Jump to content

UK says PM's adviser did not break lockdown rules with 400 km drive


Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

So all those thousands of peopl who have been unable to spend time with their loved ones as they slipped away or been able to attend their funerals - they should have ignored the rules and done what they thought best for themselves? 

People did attend funerals

As it stands, only immediate family members are allowed to attend funeral services.

Although this may vary from person to person, immediate family members generally refers to a parent, son or daughter, partner or spouse.

As a result of restrictions to how many people can attend a funeral service, you must check and confirm with your local council and funeral director as they may impose a limit on number of attendees.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/11339842/funerals-coronavirus-lockdown/

  • Confused 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 436
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Did you read the story? He wanted to get rid of the kid by dumping him on the grandparents 260 miles away. He had been in contact with a known Covid case (johnson) and both he and his wife had symptom

Misleading headline - the UK has not exonerated him; he is clearly guilty of contravening guidelines. The only ones in a position of authority who are supporting him are those desperately trying to po

By his aged parents when the kid was possibly Covid+? He could have employed an agency nurse to look after the kid at home. Might say to you "good father", to me it says "lousy father, lousy son and e

Posted Images

1 hour ago, vogie said:

But that is the point David, it appears to be an all party make it up as you go along, but in Doms case he chose his family which I'm sure most of us would have done, families come before politics.

Most of the posters on here if they were honest would have done exactly the same thing, I know I would, I would have walked the 260 miles if I had to, and if you are a father you would have done so too.

 

 May i suggest , contacting the emergency services , would have been a better option .

     They are the medical professionals , they know what they are talking about .

        Nuff said ...

 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Dumbastheycome said:

I can  can only view the actions  of this "special" person to be an abuse of position in the face of the facts.

That his wife had already been identified as  infected and the  possibility that he and his child too were latent victims then to deposit the child with elderly carers in defiance of public announced recommendations does not convince me  his  "advisory" role or excuses in justification are particularly valid.

The exact sequence is far from clear yet the gallows are already being erected. Cummings & plods version of events differ significantly from the nonsense being peddled for political gain & I for one have no idea where truth lies....and what's this about 'crime'?

  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

A non story with the usual suspects still gabbin on about Brexit, 6 pages already.

Tens of thousands in the uk haven’t bothered at all with the so called lockdown regulations, regardless of political persuasions.

This Cummings fellow was probably right from the beginning with his herd mentality.

In short no laws broken, nobody injured, nothing to see, move along, next story please.

 

Edited by twocatsmac
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, david555 said:

Most probably they also would break rules , but be very sure convinced that they have to get the punishment afterwards …… Cummings is trying to use his prerogatives  ,and that is disgusting to all the common people 

At last you have agreed with me, halleluja. It is not "disgusting to all the common people" it is disgusting to those with a political agenda.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, evadgib said:

The exact sequence is far from clear yet the gallows are already being erected. Cummings & plods version of events differ significantly from the nonsense being peddled for political gain & I for one have no idea where truth lies....and what's this about 'crime'?

lol. I think the events as outlined are no so open to much in the way of "versions". Granted the hype generated is likely to have political emphasis but as to crime ? If in  comparison  is there  any  lesser or greater crime than that of an individual of  no significance politically being laid out in a public place by British  Police for actions that in essence are equal ?

The nub of the issue is that it is another  case of  do as  "We" say, not as  we  do !

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...