Jump to content

China media, HK government bristle at Trump's pledge of curbs, sanctions


webfact

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, Dumbastheycome said:

Seems  like this new legislation is  not dis similar the US Homeland Security legislation !

Yep, plus China did show better restrain never once launched national guards onto HK streets. Also not a single casualty on protesters side except a suicidal case - protesters claimed 6 missing or dead all been found alive well later, even Mainland supporters was routinely abused even racially teased( Some rightwing stores: no service to Mandarin speaker, this event had huge impact in Chinese society even many protester leaders viewed as shame and bad PR )

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, dimitriv said:

 

It's a law that allows China to put people with a different opinion in concentration camps. They do the same with minorities having a wrong religion.

 

Are you Chinese?  I am only trying to understand your motive to defend a criminal organisation here.

 

 

 

The security law is to fulfill relevant duties to safeguard national security in accordance to the law. Yoj making things up. No mention in the law about difference in opinion or concentration camp. Why the need for such intense distraction to make a simple point. US has a long list to security laws. Are they also a criminal organization. The support from local citizens show how they feel about the security law. Stop meddling in a domestic issue. 

  • Sad 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, dimitriv said:

 

A poll organised by Tam Yiu-chung, someone who supports the CCP, a criminal organisation, published in a pro CCP newspaper.

 

What can go wrong here ?

 

 

 

 

Actually went right with over 3 million citizens expressing their support of the law. 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

The security law is to fulfill relevant duties to safeguard national security in accordance to the law. Yoj making things up. No mention in the law about difference in opinion or concentration camp. Why the need for such intense distraction to make a simple point. US has a long list to security laws. Are they also a criminal organization. The support from local citizens show how they feel about the security law. Stop meddling in a domestic issue. 

 

"to fulfill relevant duties to safeguard national security"  ->  To put people with a different opinion in concentration camps.

 

"No mention in the law about difference in opinion or concentration camp"  ->  There is no law in China talking about concentration camps. It makes no difference. They put people there having the wrong religion.

 

"US has a long list to security laws"  ->   We are talking about China and the CCP, a criminal organisation. Not about the US.

 

 

Are you Chinese?  I am only trying to understand your motive to defend a criminal organisation here.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dimitriv said:

 

You turn things around just like a real Chinese would.  If China kept to their commitments, no protest would have been necessary ...

 

 

Detail the changes in HK, prior to this.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Traubert said:

Detail the changes in HK, prior to this.

 

Hong Kong was a place with freedom of expression.

 

Thanks to Chinese influence, laws and meddling into their politics Hong Kong is now a place where you can get arrested and put in a concentration camp for saying the wrong things.

 

Are you Chinese?  I am only trying to understand your motive to defend a criminal organisation here.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, natway09 said:

Just have to accept that HK is part of China, just like Macau.

Once again if the protesters had not turned nasty this law may not have been written.

Organized, paid thugs do no one any good

HK and Macau are not part of China, if they were why do Chinese need a visa to enter.

The protests started last year when the Chinese puppet Carrie Lam wanted top pass an extradition law, you should get your facts before commenting

Hong Kong’s Leader, Carrie Lam, to Withdraw Extradition Bill That Ignited Protests

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/04/world/asia/hong-kong-carrie-lam-protests.html

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Actually went right with over 3 million citizens expressing their support of the law. 

sure!!!! and China only had 83.017 covid19 infections and 4,634 deaths

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...