Jump to content

Stringent new normal measures imposed nationwide


rooster59

Recommended Posts

Stringent new normal measures imposed nationwide

Praphorn Praphornkul

 

d609c8659139511453f8569faa9c8585_small.jpg

 

CHANTHABURI (NNT) - Provinces have stepped up measures following the third phase of the lockdown relaxation, with Chanthaburi province announcing a D-Day against people leaving their homes without masks.

 

The authorities in Chanthaburi have noted travelers dropping their guard in terms of COVID-19 avoidance practices, with local public health official, Dr. Apirak Pisutaporn, urging visitors to closed spaces to keep their masks on, and to avoid crowded places.

 

Chanthaburi Governor Witurat Srinam admitted that locals have been seen commuting without waering masks and thereby posing a risk of a second wave of infections. The province will enforce mask-wearing stringently with a 20,000 baht fine from June 6 onward.

 

At Phuket’s second transport terminal meanwhile, a large number of people were seen buying tickets to return home. The hub is practicing strict checks including temperature screenings and distancing. Sritrang Tours, which runs between Phuket and Hat Yai has reduced its bus loads from a maximum of 39 to only 19, and mandated that passengers scan the Thai Chana platform, with those unable to do so required to fill out a form.

 

People traveling to Phuket are required to register on the PHUKET SMART CHECK-IN application in accordance with anti-communicable disease measures.

 

Phang Nga Transport Terminal, has similarly seen an uptick in activity after restrictions on inter-provincial travel were lifted on June 4. Drivers at the terminal are required to report for temperature screenings as part of safety measures. They noted passengers have not reached their maximum yet, as only journeys to the south, including Phuket, Su-ngai Kolok and Betong are available.

 

nnt.jpg

-- © Copyright NNT 2020-06-07
 
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Krataiboy said:

 

Unless you are over pensionable age, your chances of dying, or even getting seriously ill from COVID are negligible.

 

The sick and elderly should be isolated. Everyone else should get on with their lives, just as we do for normal flu epidemics.

 

To hell with the "New Normal". Insist on getting the old normal back - or prepare for a life of neo-feudalism run by self-serving politicians and deranged technocrats.

Bet you're not sick and elderly....:whistling:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Krataiboy said:

 

Unless you are over pensionable age, your chances of dying, or even getting seriously ill from COVID are negligible.

 

The sick and elderly should be isolated. Everyone else should get on with their lives, just as we do for normal flu epidemics.

 

To hell with the "New Normal". Insist on getting the old normal back - or prepare for a life of neo-feudalism run by self-serving politicians and deranged technocrats.

As one of those over pensionable age you suggest I should be isolated for  your sake  or mine?

I ask that question in consideration of self serving criteria.

Many societies live in multi generational family residence. Do those societies  rip out and  segregate the  older generation "in their=whose best interests" ?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Dumbastheycome said:

As one of those over pensionable age you suggest I should be isolated for  your sake  or mine?

I ask that question in consideration of self serving criteria.

Many societies live in multi generational family residence. Do those societies  rip out and  segregate the  older generation "in their=whose best interests" ?

 

Yes as the rest  of  your family  could  earn an income to  support  you, alternatively  you  can  all end  up with  no  money,if  were  talking Thai  families, economies  in ruins.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Krataiboy said:

 

Unless you are over pensionable age, your chances of dying, or even getting seriously ill from COVID are negligible.

 

The sick and elderly should be isolated. Everyone else should get on with their lives, just as we do for normal flu epidemics.

 

To hell with the "New Normal". Insist on getting the old normal back - or prepare for a life of neo-feudalism run by self-serving politicians and deranged technocrats.

Netflix are running a great new Sci-Fi season...right up your street

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, bodga said:

Yes as the rest  of  your family  could  earn an income to  support  you, alternatively  you  can  all end  up with  no  money,if  were  talking Thai  families, economies  in ruins.

A major glitch in that concept is that the eldest generation in many Asian  societies are often the caregivers to the youngest which allows the working generation to go out  to do so. Segregating would have a double negative effect perhaps?

Paid childcare and homes for the elderly are a facet of the so called wealthy world. Instituted by squeezing  financial capacity, creating social coping industries that operate at some level of profit, and cleverly fashion disassociated families and whole societies who become easier victims of social engineering in compliance.

" Run Forrest, Run ! "

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Dumbastheycome said:

As one of those over pensionable age you suggest I should be isolated for  your sake  or mine?

I ask that question in consideration of self serving criteria.

Many societies live in multi generational family residence. Do those societies  rip out and  segregate the  older generation "in their=whose best interests" ?

 

It seems you and I are in the same leaky boat. My plan is to stay put, as I am pretty fit and healthy for my age. However, with a daughter due to return to school in July I may have to rethink my strategy if there is a "second wave".

 

A good idea would be for schools to screen returness initially and at intervals thereafter and warn parents of students found to infected (though, apparently, the virus does not spread easily to adults from children). Otherwise, we will be playing a guessing game.

 

We have a spare room which could be used for self isolation, which hopefully won't be needed.

Whatever happens, I have no intention of being "ripped out and segregated" (by whom?).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Krataiboy said:

 

Unless you are over pensionable age, your chances of dying, or even getting seriously ill from COVID are negligible.

 

 

 

 

Many young people have died from Covid; how do you rationalize that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, damascase said:

I still have problems to understand what role these masks have if the number of infections is really as low as published. How can you spread something that isn’t there to begin with?

At first I was a sceptic of wearing a mask, but it seems the primary means of infection is via airborne transmission, then a mask makes a lot of sense.  It just takes one infected person to spread the virus which means we all should be wearing masks at least until such time as there are no more infections. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, kokopelli said:

At first I was a sceptic of wearing a mask, but it seems the primary means of infection is via airborne transmission, then a mask makes a lot of sense.  It just takes one infected person to spread the virus which means we all should be wearing masks at least until such time as there are no more infections. 

Like now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...