Jump to content
BANGKOK
snoop1130

Trump raises possibility of delaying November U.S. presidential election

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, johnnybangkok said:

I have seen you post in previous posts Tippaporn and it always follows exactly the same formula so I think I'm spot on when I say I gaurantee you did not have an opinion of mail-in voting BEFORE Trump made it a thing. And once Trump makes it a thing, you fall obediantly in line like all Trump fans do and try your utmost to justify HIS stance. Facts don't matter to you because you can cherry pick your own facts with that one time you know, when it happened they way Trump says it could happen. Never mind the fact that there's been literally thousands of times when it didn't happen; that one time is good enough for your echo chamber.

There is no point debating you as there often is no point in debating most ardent Trump fans because the world is against you and your beloved leader and  you'll be damned if they get the final word when you've still got breath in your lungs to argue black is white.

It's boring and predictable and I only hope come November we will hear the last of all Trump fans once and for all. 

Happy to hear that you have me pegged, johnny.  Of course you couldn't be more wrong but does that matter to you?  Next you'll be claiming that you know me better than I do.  You could just call me a liar, too.  LOL

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, Susco said:

 

So you're saying that, according to another poster it has been active in 32 states for years already, it hasn't been tested yet?

As I mentioned in my earlier post, it ain't apples to apples.  Maybe to you it is but not to me.

 

I may as well ask you, too . . . did you watch the video of the CBS News test?  If you did do you comprehend the very real results?  Watch it and then get back to me with your arguments.

 

Edited by Tippaporn
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:
1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:
1 hour ago, Bluespunk said:

Ah, truth hurting is it. 
 

It might not scare you, but it is another piece of the jigsaw that is in all probability going to lead trump to ignominious defeat this November. 

Go ahead and make sh!t up and believe it's r-e-a-l.  I don't care how you fool yourself.  Your life, not mine.

I’ve not made anything up. Merely referring to the success of this republican campaign against trump. 

"Ah, truth hurting is it."

 

Well, then explain to whom you were referring to?  LOL

 

Was it a success?  And the measurement was?  Maybe they were all patting each other on the back over the fact that Trump responded to them with a tweet so that must have meant success?

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 7/31/2020 at 8:59 AM, AndrewMciver said:

His only hope is a vaccine. 

This is fascinating - In what way have he contributed to creating a vaccine? Does he have a side gig going were he need to wear a white coat?

 

Why should the vaccine have anything do do with him getting re-elected or not ?

 

  • Confused 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
45 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

"Ah, truth hurting is it."

 

Well, then explain to whom you were referring to?  LOL

 

Was it a success?  And the measurement was?  Maybe they were all patting each other on the back over the fact that Trump responded to them with a tweet so that must have meant success?

Truth hurting is the explanation I gathered from your extraordinary response to a post of mine. 
 

It was without doubt a success, donations over 20 million now. As the report states, 2 million dollars donated after trump responded.
 

He is being dragged off message and engaging in personal grievance tweeting by this campaign which is one of this republican groups goals. 

Their message is reaching a wider audience because of increased funds and trump’s response to their campaign. 
 

 

So, donations up, more people hearing their message and trump going off topic, yep, that’s a success. 

Edited by Bluespunk
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Apples and Oranges you say, and yet Trump is suggesting delaying the election all together.

Trump was not president in 1918 (of course) but considering the super low turnout maybe it would have been a good idea. At least everyone would have a fair chance to vote. Some countries did delay votes that year, I believe.

 

8 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

As for your claim that 'They knew what would happen', its unsubstantiated, as is your 'Everyone knows'

Ok, maybe now days some in the US may not know. But historically its well known, which is why everywhere in the world has always protected against voter fraud and election monitoring is so wide spread.

 

No one can feign surprise.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...