Jump to content

PM aide Cummings damaged public confidence in UK COVID-19 response: study


webfact

Recommended Posts

22 hours ago, lungbing said:

Didn't Kinnock junior break the same rules when visiting his parents?  But there again he's Liebour so  the press won't follow up on thaht.

Except that they, and the police, did follow up on that!

 

For example, from the Guardian 29th March: Stephen Kinnock targeted by police for visiting father, Neil

Quote

The MP son of Neil Kinnock, the former Labour leader, has been publicly shamed by police for “non-essential” travel during the coronavirus lockdown after going to celebrate his father’s 78th birthday.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, 3NUMBAS said:

desperate lefty tosh .its a minor matter compared with starmers not taking action against pedos

 

You and @twocatsmac are laying blame at Starmer's door for events which either happened before he became DPP, the Rotherham and other scandals, or had no control over afterwards, Saville.

 

That you consider false accusations of rape to be a minor matter is reprehensible; would you continue with that view were it to happen to you? 

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, twocatsmac said:

Thats the spirit mate.

Ignore anything which does not suit your agenda.

What could possibly be wrong with that?

It is certainly something TVF's Barstool Brexiteers have been doing since the referendum campaign!

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

 

You and @twocatsmac are laying blame at Starmer's door for events which either happened before he became DPP, the Rotherham and other scandals, or had no control over afterwards, Saville.

 

That you consider false accusations of rape to be a minor matter is reprehensible; would you continue with that view were it to happen to you? 

 

Starmer and the BBC,  Esther Rantzen too.

Now what do they have in common sunshine? 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, twocatsmac said:

Starmer and the BBC,  Esther Rantzen too.

Now what do they have in common sunshine? 

 

 

 

 

What are you burbling on about? 

 

The BBC may have hidden Saville's activities, which is a scandal.

 

Rantzen not speaking out, with her self publicised protection of children and as the founder of Childline, shows what a hypocrite she is.

 

Starmer? Don't think he's ever worked for the BBC, Rantzen nor Childline. But if you know different....... 

 

That you lot are having to resort to these tactics only shows how scared you are of a revitalised Labour party under Starmer.

 

So are the Tories; which is why Johnson's days are numbered.

Edited by 7by7
Addendum
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2020 at 12:25 PM, Rookiescot said:

Not long ago this would have resulted in resignations and even a collapse of the government.

Not now though. The UK has become so right wing that democracy is no longer functioning. 

This kind of corruption and things like Johnsons friends and family promotions to the house of Lords would be worthy of someone like Robert Mugabe.

when he was found driving around I said so.... if he or the 2 of them had any balls they should quit, they didn't listen and I also said, Cummings actions would be biting both on the rear, time is co(u)mi(m)ing 555

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2020 at 3:04 PM, evadgib said:

The study seems to have omitted the fact that Cummings successfully neutered a remainer-orchestrated coup while Boris languished in ICU.

anything to back up such a non sense, come on give it a try

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

What are you burbling on about? 

 

The BBC may have hidden Saville's activities, which is a scandal.

 

Rantzen not speaking out, with her self publicised protection of children and as the founder of Childline, shows what a hypocrite she is.

 

Starmer? Don't think he's ever worked for the BBC, Rantzen nor Childline. But if you know different....... 

 

That you lot are having to resort to these tactics only shows how scared you are of a revitalised Labour party under Starmer.

 

So are the Tories; which is why Johnson's days are numbered.

 

Did Starmer “Fix it” for Jim ?  

 

I’ll share a little secret with you.

 When you’re elected PM you have 4 years as head honcho, so you may want to edit your, 

“Johnson’s days are numbered” routine.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/7/2020 at 10:55 AM, OneMoreFarang said:

Anybody who follows the news knows that without any study.

My thoughts exactly, but then I listened to the interview of the lady who led on this. She was very convincing as to the extent of the 'damage' done and how strongly the data collected, supported the proposition of his activities damaging public confidence.

 

I would also point out the genius of Cummings is far from proved......he has been involved in two, two horse races and happened to be on the winning side in both.

 

If he had fought for Remain and won against 40 years of lies from the Mail/Express/Telegraph or installed the most reviled (by the same papers) contender for the PM'ship (Corbyn) then I would agree he might classed a genius.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, twocatsmac said:

Did Starmer “Fix it” for Jim ?  

No.

 

1 hour ago, twocatsmac said:

I’ll share a little secret with you.

 When you’re elected PM you have 4 years as head honcho, so you may want to edit your, 

“Johnson’s days are numbered” routine.

For starters, under the Fixed Term Parliament Act 2011 it's five years between general elections.

 

However, The government can ask Parliament to pass an Act calling for a snap election at any time; as happened with the 2019 General Election, held 30 months after the 2017 one.

 

But, the Prime Minister is not personally elected at a General Election, and can change during a government's term if they resign or are sacked by their party. This has happened many times; three times so far this century. When Brown replaced Blair, May replaced Cameron and Johnson replaced May. 

 

It will happen again next year when the Tories finally tire of being bossed around by Cummings and so replace his puppet.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, 7by7 said:

No.

 

You should read up on UK electoral law before making a fool of yourself with such statements. For starters, under the Fixed Term Parliament Act 2011 it's five years between general elections.

 

However, The government can ask Parliament to pass an Act calling for a snap election at any time; as happened with the 2019 General Election, held 30 months after the 2017 one.

 

But, the Prime Minister is not personally elected at a General Election, and can change during a government's term if they resign or are sacked by their party. This has happened many times; three times so far this century. When Brown replaced Blair, May replaced Cameron and Johnson replaced May. 

 

It will happen again next year when the Tories finally tire of being bossed around by Cummings and so replace his puppet.

As I say in 2 lines and you repeat in 13 lines, he has 4 more years.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, twocatsmac said:

As I say in 2 lines and you repeat in 13 lines, he has 4 more years.

 

Not what you said:

1 hour ago, twocatsmac said:

 When you’re elected PM you have 4 years as head honcho

 

But Johnson will only get his 5 years from last December, if Parliament and/or his party allow it.

 

Which is very unlikely; especially the latter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...