Jump to content

Billionaire Bloomberg to spend $100 million in Florida to help Biden


webfact

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, simple1 said:

No, it is not irrelevant, it provides clarity on his complete disregard for suppliers / creditors. If you want to beat trump's drum show where trump has compensated his unsecured creditors once he regained wealth. In the meantime, trump's lack of character has been demonstrated numerous times with various fraudulent activities. Yes, I know he hasn't been jailed, pays large amounts to his lawyers, settles out of Court etc. If it was a guy cheating someone for $10k he would have served time, but for the wealthy...

Not been jailed yet. LOCK HIM UP could happen sooner rather than later. He will be losing Teflon Don coating if the pols hold true.

 

https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/donald-trump-criminal-case.html

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MajarTheLion said:

Opinions vary. Here is one that lays out an alternate opinion and examples as to why:

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/499065-lies-damned-lies-and-the-truth-about-joe-biden

 

More recently, Joe Biden was caught lying about his position on banning fracking:

 

https://www.wibc.com/blogs/tony-katz/busted-biden-caught-on-tape-lying-about-fracking-ban/

 

You'd have to work harder than that to make the claim that he's on par with Trump on this department.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, MajarTheLion said:

Yes, I saw that. Didn't look good. However, I would dispute your description of events. "All those"? How many were there? "Ships"? First, let's look at the definition of "ship", keeping in mind the parade was on a lake:

 

  • n.
    A vessel of considerable size for deep-water navigation.
  • n.
    A sailing vessel having three or more square-rigged masts
 
I don't see how any of the vessels in question could be described as "ships". Furthermore, there are a few other matters of relevance. First, there's the number of boat parades versus the number of boats damaged or sunk. Given one parade alone had over 3,000 boats show up, the proportion is very small. Then there is the fact that there are no boat parades at all for Joe Biden (that I've heard of, feel free to enlighten me if I have missed anything). This is in perfect alignment with the statistical enthusiasm gap Biden suffers from. So in the end, a few damaged and/or sunk boats means little to nothing.

 

Let the nitpicking begin.....

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Morch said:

 

Let the nitpicking begin.....

In response to blatant and intentional embellishment for obvious self serving reasons.

 

"Just the facts ma'am"

Dragnet Joe Friday ~1950/60's

Edited by xofswen
add a photo/?
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Smigel said:

Has it ever occurred to you why so many self interest groups are spending so much money to remove a non politician from the white House. 

Please don't come back with because he's a waycist, xenophobic, misogynistic, lying, sexist, pussy grabbing, veteran hating incompetent. 

Not only is it complete rubbish, it is also boring and unoriginal. 

The answer is simple. The guy can never admit that he is wrong, even if someone holds the evidence in his face.

 

He is also a danger to the agreements and the statibility in a quite fragile world.

Edited by Matzzon
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2020 at 1:18 PM, candide said:

Which is exactly what you are doing (repeating it over and over again to make it truth).

You will not find any quote from Pelosi or Biden mentioning the CHINA travel ban, nor saying that the WHO showed no evidence etc....

BTW are you aware that it's Trump who downplayed the epidemic, stating that Dems were creating panic?

I beg to differ, both Biden and Pelosi labelled Trumps ban on travel from China and slightly later the EU, xenophobic. 

Pelosi openly encouraged travel to Chinatown, proclaiming it perfectly safe to do so. 

Why are you openly lying.? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Matzzon said:

The answer is simple. The guy can never admit that he is wrong, even if someone holds the evidence in his face.

 

He is also a danger to the agreements and the statibility in a quite fragile world.

The ink wasn't dry on hew NAFTA and he  hit Canada with more aluminum tariffs. Sometime today a  vulnerable American industry will get whacked  back 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/14/2020 at 11:01 PM, MajarTheLion said:

Opinions vary. Here is one that lays out an alternate opinion and examples as to why:

 

https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/499065-lies-damned-lies-and-the-truth-about-joe-biden

 

More recently, Joe Biden was caught lying about his position on banning fracking:

 

https://www.wibc.com/blogs/tony-katz/busted-biden-caught-on-tape-lying-about-fracking-ban/

You know what I mean

These are all public knowledge 

 

C507C6C9-3912-4B95-B5BB-BFA3A83A9C75.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

" if the campaign took place only on the web, the three scientists from Neuchâtel and Bern would predict another victory for Donald Trump. “Repeating a message, even false or misleading, achieves the intended objective,” 

https://www.web24.news/u/2020/09/donald-trump-the-winner-according-to-two-universities-that-had-already-predicted-his-victory-in-2016.html

Edited by Opl
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...