Jump to content

U.S. Justice Dept weighs stripping federal funds from cities allowing 'anarchy'

Recommended Posts

U.S. Justice Dept weighs stripping federal funds from cities allowing 'anarchy'

By Sarah N. Lynch



FILE PHOTO: SWAT team members travel in an armored vehicle past a sign with a list of protester demands as Seattle Police retake the Capitol Hill Occupied Protest (CHOP) area, including their East Precinct, in Seattle, Washington, U.S. July 1, 2020. REUTERS/Lindsey Wasson/File Photo


WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department on Monday threatened to revoke federal funding for New York City, Seattle and Portland, Oregon, saying the three liberal cities were allowing anarchy and violence on their streets.


"We cannot allow federal tax dollars to be wasted when the safety of the citizenry hangs in the balance," Attorney General William Barr said in a statement.


In a joint statement, New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler, and Seattle Mayor Jenny Durkan accused the Trump administration of playing politics and said withholding federal funds would be illegal.


“This is thoroughly political and unconstitutional. The president is playing cheap political games with congressionally directed funds. Our cities are bringing communities together; our cities are pushing forward after fighting back a pandemic and facing the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, all despite recklessness and partisanship from the White House," they said.


Many cities across the United States have experienced unrest since the May death of George Floyd. In some cases the protests have escalated into violence and looting.


The federal government has mounted a campaign to disperse the violence, including by sending federal agents into Portland and Seattle and encouraging federal prosecutors to bring charges.


Last week, the Justice Department urged federal prosecutors to consider sedition charges against protesters who have burned buildings and engaged in other violent activity.


Monday's threat to revoke federal funds was the government's latest escalation in its quest to curb the protests.


It comes after President Donald Trump earlier this month issued a memo laying out criteria to consider when reviewing funding for states and cities that are "permitting anarchy, violence, and destruction in American cities.”


The criteria include things such as whether a city forbids the police from intervening or if it defunds its police force.


In all three cities, the Justice Department said, the leadership has rejected efforts to allow federal law enforcement officials to intervene and restore order, among other things.


In a press briefing earlier on Monday, New York City Corporation Counsel Jim Johnson promised a court battle if the Trump administration proceeds to cut off the funds.


"The president does not have the authority to change the will of Congress," he said.


"The designation of 'anarchy' doesn't even pass the common sense test. If need be we can send, in addition to our legal filings, a dictionary. Because what we have in New York is not anarchy."


(Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Additional reporting by Barbara Goldberg and Maria Caspani in New York City; Editing by Steve Orlofsky and Cynthia Osterman)



-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-09-22
  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Apparently you don’t know the history of the USA.  Where do you get your news? When people lose hope, this is what happens. Why do you think this is happening?  I guess it has nothing to do

I don’t wish to get involved in American politics as I am not American but the actions of so many so called Protesters could clearly  be classed as anarchy . The peaceful protests where people express

Er, wasn't it to do with a African American being appallingly killed by police whilst they attempted to arrest him? (I watched the video on a French site and it was clear the deceased was terrified ev

Posted Images

3 hours ago, Baerboxer said:


Er, wasn't it to do with a African American being appallingly killed by police whilst they attempted to arrest him? (I watched the video on a French site and it was clear the deceased was terrified even while still sitting in his own car begging not to be harmed). He was the latest, at the time, in a long list of African Americans killed by police in rather odd circumstances. Only this time it was caught on many phone videos for all to see.


The ensuing understandable protests were hi-jacked by the looters, criminals, anarchists, trouble makers, and radical left who turned them into anti establishment riots, theft bonanzas and political intimidation. Which inevitably brings a response from the ultra right. Lives were lost.


It seems a failure of law enforcement at all levels by politicians trying to use it for party and personal political advantage. Trump and his supporters calling for law and order whilst Harris and other leading democrats setting up funds to bail out those arrested for looting, arson and vandalism.


Hopefully, one day, and one day soon, people will wake up to how politicians of all sides manipulate them,

Agree, the blatant injustice was the spark and that the justified frustration/anger has been building as a result of the policies of both political parties over the past few decades. The madness continues until the underlying issue is addressed.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Create New...