snoop1130 Posted September 30, 2020 Share Posted September 30, 2020 Former Pheu Thai candidate threatens to sue the Election Commission A former election candidate, for the opposition Pheu Thai Party, has threatened to sue the Election Commission (EC) after the Supreme Court’s Division for Election Cases dismissed the EC’s petition to revoke the candidate’s election rights and seek compensation for the expense of holding the resulting by-election. The court overruled the EC’s decision, which found Suraphol Kiatchaiyakorn, a 2019 candidate in Constituency 8 of Chiang Mai province, at fault for vote buying, after he made a donation of 2,000 baht to a senior monk during the campaign. As a result of the EC’s decision, Suraphol, who won the election in Constituency 8 with more than 50,000 votes, was disqualified and stripped of his election rights for a year, pending a final ruling from the Supreme Court. A by-election was then held and Srinuan Boonlue, of the now defunct Future Forward Party, was elected. She later quit to join the Bhumjaithai Party. Suraphol said that he was delighted at the Supreme Court’s ruling, adding that this was the first vote buying case in which the EC had been defeated by an MP. His lawyer, Pokpong Klabvisit, said he would wait for a clear response from the EC about how it will deal with the 50,000 plus votes received by Suraphol. Initially, however, he said he will sue the EC, demanding 70 million baht in compensation for the loss of the opportunity to perform his duty as an MP. Pheu Thai Party’s acting leader, Chusak Sirinil, said that he has raised objections several times about the semi-judicial powers granted to the EC by the Constitution and the Election Act. The powers enable the EC to issue an “Orange Card” or to revoke the election rights of a candidate suspected of vote buying or other election cheating, pending a final decision by a court. Since the House seat, which was won by Suraphol, has already been taken by a candidate who won the by-election, Chusak said he doesn’t know how the EC will deal with the matter. Former election commissioner Somchai Srisutthiyakorn said, in his Facebook post today, that the Supreme Court’s ruling will not have any effect on the results of the by-election, adding, however, that Suraphol has the right to contest future elections and to demand compensation from the EC. Meanwhile, the EC says it had done its job properly and used its discretion, in compliance with the Constitution, when it disqualified Suraphol’s. The EC also said that its action is protected by law and it cannot be held accountable for criminal or civil liabilities. Source: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/former-pheu-thai-candidate-threatens-to-sue-the-election-commission/ -- © Copyright Thai PBS 2020-09-30 - Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you - Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
holy cow cm Posted September 30, 2020 Share Posted September 30, 2020 2 hours ago, snoop1130 said: The EC also said that its action is protected by law and it cannot be held accountable for criminal or civil liabilities Of course they are. Immunity to swing an axe at any whim. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark131v Posted September 30, 2020 Share Posted September 30, 2020 4 hours ago, snoop1130 said: Initially, however, he said he will sue the EC, demanding 70 million baht in compensation for the loss of the opportunity to perform his duty as an MP. Blimey is that the going rate they expect for a term at the trough? Thailand is truly shafted by the whole nest of snakes, their greed and lack of anything even resembling honesty or honour is appalling, all the lot of them are despicable and beneath contempt.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bangkokfrog Posted September 30, 2020 Share Posted September 30, 2020 7 hours ago, holy cow cm said: Of course they are. Immunity to swing an axe at any whim. Not a whim, for the EC its more like lap dogs following instructions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 15 hours ago, snoop1130 said: Pheu Thai Party’s acting leader, Chusak Sirinil, said that he has raised objections several times about the semi-judicial powers granted to the EC by the Constitution and the Election Act. The powers enable the EC to issue an “Orange Card” or to revoke the election rights of a candidate suspected of vote buying or other election cheating, pending a final decision by a court. 15 hours ago, snoop1130 said: The EC also said that its action is protected by law and it cannot be held accountable for criminal or civil liabilities. Something that needs to written out of the new constitution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trucking Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 On 9/30/2020 at 4:05 AM, snoop1130 said: demanding 70 million baht in compensation for the loss of the opportunity to perform his duty as an MP. Say what fella ? From this we can only conclude that his main duty as an MP was filling his own bank account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Bill Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 16 hours ago, snoop1130 said: for the opposition Pheu Thai Party, has threatened to sue the Election Commission (EC) Will he be issuing them with one of these??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post klauskunkel Posted October 1, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted October 1, 2020 (edited) 16 hours ago, snoop1130 said: The EC also said that its action is protected by law and it cannot be held accountable for criminal or civil liabilities. In other words, the EC will do with impunity whatever the PM wants them to do. That's an essential setup for any authoritarian regime. And now they publicly admitted the scenario. Extremely unafraid. Edited October 1, 2020 by klauskunkel 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Tracy Posted October 1, 2020 Share Posted October 1, 2020 16 hours ago, snoop1130 said: The EC also said that its action is protected by law and it cannot be held accountable for criminal or civil liabilities. Defamation. Get them... Cannot be held accountable?. What rubbish. People made the decision, the institution didn't. People must be held accountable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now