Jump to content

Twitter briefly restricts Trump campaign account amid Republican outcry


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Tippaporn said:

My observation is that there are many, many people in the west who seem to want nothing more than to implement a Chinese approach to the flow of information.  In essence, 'authorities,' or those who are part of the 'club,' determine what information is to be approved for public consumption and all other information is harshly censored.  Supported only by the people who side with the 'club.'

 

The president is not censored. He can, and does, say whatever he wants.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, placeholder said:
1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

Yes, the Biden campaign has stated that this alleged meeting with Biden and Vadym Pozharsky did not take place because Joe Biden’s official schedules from the time show no meeting.

 

It's only logical that a criminal's first and foremost consideration when committing a crime, aside from the intention of actually committing the crime, is to conceal it.  Logically it would follow that holding a meeting involving criminality would need to be hidden, or off the books.  This point is not raised by the MSM as they attempt to use the absence of a meeting from Biden's official schedule as proof that the meeting never took place.  Therefore the only logical and plausible conclusion one can draw from the MSM's failure to mention this point is that they're involved in helping to cover up and protect Joe Biden.

What crime would have been committed had Biden and Pozharsky actually met? What service did Biden provide him?

Seems you're not following the evidence or you'd rather ignore it.

 

Aside from the issue of a crime it contradicts Joe Biden's claim that he was clueless as to Hunter being on the board of Burisma or his involvement.  Joe Biden would then have lied.  And if he lied then what was his lying trying to hide?

  • Like 2
  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Tippaporn said:

Seems you're not following the evidence or you'd rather ignore it.

 

Aside from the issue of a crime it contradicts Joe Biden's claim that he was clueless as to Hunter being on the board of Burisma or his involvement.  Joe Biden would then have lied.  And if he lied then what was his lying trying to hide?

Thanks for not answering the question. What would be the crime if it turns out that Biden and Pozharsky had met?

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

If you have been paying attention, many MSM narratives are crumbling over the last few days. Steve Scully admitting he was NOT hacked(remember this from last week?) should be a major wakeup call. The debates was rigged, they used a neverTrump moderator. The left said no way. Now Scully admits he lied and was not hacked. Same will happen with this huge data trove. Occam's razor says it is real, the video and photos tend to prove the veracity of the claims they were really from Hunter's computer. I fail to see how people can try denying this?

This New York Post disinformation nonsense is crumbling, so I get your point.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tippaporn said:

Possibly.  But probably not.  How many examples would I need to post of the U.S. government withholding critical and damning information?

The US Government under Donald Trump and the FBI under the USAG Bill Barr.

 

These two seem to be awfully cunning in their efforts to help Biden.

 

Alternatively you are dreaming up conspiracies that don’t exist.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mtls2005 said:

"Un-masking" goes belly up.

 

The next day giuliani drops Russian misinformation.

 

Backfired.

 

White House was warned Giuliani was target of Russian ...

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/giuliani-biden-ukraine-russian-disinformation/2020/10/15/43158900-0ef5-11eb-b1e8-16b59b92b36d_story.html

 

 

At least there's a smart one in tha family...

 

Rudy Giuliani's Daughter Caroline on Voting for Joe Biden ...

 

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2020/10/rudy-giulianis-daughter-on-voting-for-biden

 

Try to search for corroborating information contained in the WaPo article you linked to.  I found nada, other than other outlets reprinting the WaPo article.  Once again, only rumours by a whole lot of unnamed sources with no substatiations of anything.  The article even points out that:

 

“National Security Advisor O’Brien and White House Counsel Cipollone meet with the President frequently on a variety of matters. Ambassador O’Brien does not comment on sensitive intelligence topics, or on the advice he provides President Trump,” National Security Council spokesman John Ullyot said in a written statement. The national security adviser “can say that the President always treats such briefings with the utmost seriousness. The characterization of the meeting as described in this article is not accurate.”

 

Another smear campaign against Giuliani.  What else is new.  Just trying to smear the 'source' of the Biden revelations as a lame attempt to discredit those revelations.

 

Who cares about who Giuliani's daughter is going to vote for.  Has nothing to do with this topic.  Neither does the investigation into Flynn unmaskings.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Tippaporn said:

All of the Russian collusion, which turned out to be false, was not manufactured fake news?  That was all good with Twitter and FB.  Do you think people don't see the hypocrisy here?

You are aware this is most likely a russan disinformation operation done with trumps blessings that’s why it was pulled It’s now under investigation and the russan (interference)is proven along with trumps use of it in 2016 just not to the level of bring up a sitting president on charges especially with a corrupt attorney general covering for him

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

Another smear campaign against Giuliani.  What else is new.  Just trying to smear the 'source' of the Biden revelations as a lame attempt to discredit those revelations.

In case you aren't aware, Trump has access to the most advanced, sophisticated, robust, and dynamic intelligence in the world.  The US spends billions of dollars on this, with thousands of professional men and women who do this stuff every single day.  That's all they do.

 

Yet, Trump relies on stuff from Rudy?  This makes sense to you??

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...