Hunter Biden’s laptop is the new Pizzagate

[Jeffr2 7,327]

7 minutes ago, polpott said:

There's zero evidence of paedophilia on the laptop Another ridiculous conspiracy theory. Trump and his acolytes must be seriously desperate.

But, but, but Hillary...but, but, but Obama....but, but, but....

 

They love to deflect, but hate to accept responsibility.

[polpott 5,102]

1 minute ago, Jeffr2 said:

But, but, but Hillary...but, but, but Obama....but, but, but....

 

They love to deflect, but hate to accept responsibility.

Apparently Trump will try to make Hunter Biden the focus of tonight's debate. No doubt Joe will come to the party forewarned and forearmed. I can see that mute button getting some hammer. Should be fun but will contribute zero to the election.

[Rimmer 10,746]

A post citing a highly questionable source has been removed

[TopDeadSenter 10,812]

1 hour ago, polpott said:

New York Post is not a credible source. They started this conspiracy theory by publishing unverified claims which have since been shown to be false

Is the Department of Justice a credible source? Is Biden's surrogate team manager a credible source? Is the head of National Intelligence agency a credible source? Is the FBI a credible source?

 

If you say no, you out yourself as a conspiracy theorist. If you say yes, you accept the emails have been confirmed as authentic and not a Russian disinformation campaign as was initially promoted by the left when this story 1st broke.

 

 What is it to be?

 

As I previously wrote. If Giuliani and the NYPost knew this was a hoax and ran with it, there is no punishment too strong for them. Their crime would be so evil. Likewise if Dorsey, Zuckerberg, bosses of all MSM outlets censoring this news, and anyone else in a position of censorial authority knew the emails were credible(which the main govt security agencies confirm it to be!) well their crime is the epitome of evil, and no punishment could be too strong for their covering up the truth and pushing a fake narrative to swing an election.  Sadly, as I wrote this before all centrists/conservatives agreed 100%. They want to know who is the liar, who is the conspiracist. Yet the left do not agree, they only want to punish Giuliani if he is wrong. that say it all about their confidence in their position at this stage, does it not.?

 

 

[polpott 5,102]

1 minute ago, TopDeadSenter said:

If Giuliani and the NYPost knew this was a hoax and ran with it, there is no punishment too strong for them.

They did and there isn't.

[Jeffr2 7,327]

1 minute ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Is the Department of Justice a credible source? Is Biden's surrogate team manager a credible source? Is the head of National Intelligence agency a credible source? Is the FBI a credible source?

 

If you say no, you out yourself as a conspiracy theorist. If you say yes, you accept the emails have been confirmed as authentic and not a Russian disinformation campaign as was initially promoted by the left when this story 1st broke.

 

 What is it to be?

 

As I previously wrote. If Giuliani and the NYPost knew this was a hoax and ran with it, there is no punishment too strong for them. Their crime would be so evil. Likewise if Dorsey, Zuckerberg, bosses of all MSM outlets censoring this news, and anyone else in a position of censorial authority knew the emails were credible(which the main govt security agencies confirm it to be!) well their crime is the epitome of evil, and no punishment could be too strong for their covering up the truth and pushing a fake narrative to swing an election.  Sadly, as I wrote this before all centrists/conservatives agreed 100%. They want to know who is the liar, who is the conspiracist. Yet the left do not agree, they only want to punish Giuliani if he is wrong. that say it all about their confidence in their position at this stage, does it not.?

 

 

The DOJ is no longer a credible source due to Barr.  The FBI is no longer a credible source due to Trump's political appointments.  The DNI is not a credible source.  The NYPost story is not credible, as has been pointed out by many!

 

Read this.  Stunning.  But I'm not sure you'll care about it.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/17/politics/bill-barr-donald-trump-attorney-general/index.html

[Jeffr2 7,327]

Talk about criminal.  This needs to be investigated, and probably will be once Biden wins.  Both Trump and Barr should be prosecuted for this.  The DOJ isn't there to help Trump win another election.

 

https://www.wsj.com/articles/trump-urges-barr-to-initiate-investigation-into-joe-biden-and-son-11603220876

 

Trump Urges Barr to Initiate Investigation Into Joe Biden and Son

 

President increases calls for probes of rival as other inquiries fail to produce indictments or show wrongdoing

[TopDeadSenter 10,812]

11 minutes ago, polpott said:

They did and there isn't.

Well if you are right, nobody will hound them and push for a more severe sentence than me. Can you say the same? If the emails are proven genuine and it is shown the MSM and censors acted with evil intent to push a fake narrative with the goal being to swing a democratic election?

[polpott 5,102]

Just now, TopDeadSenter said:

Well if you are right, nobody will hound them and push for a more severe sentence than me. Can you say the same? If the emails are proven genuine and it is shown the MSM and censors acted with evil intent to push a fake narrative with the goal being to swing a democratic election?

You mean like the Hilary emails which were later adjudged to be fake news were used to swing the Republican election?

[Sujo 16,671]

3 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

Well if you are right, nobody will hound them and push for a more severe sentence than me. Can you say the same? If the emails are proven genuine and it is shown the MSM and censors acted with evil intent to push a fake narrative with the goal being to swing a democratic election?

What evil intent. They want it verified before they publish. Even fox news refused. Even the reporter who wrote it refused to put his name on it.

 

It cannot be verified by screenshots and pdf files. It need metadata. Rudy has that.

[canuckamuck 30,512]

23 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

The DOJ is no longer a credible source due to Barr.  The FBI is no longer a credible source due to Trump's political appointments.  The DNI is not a credible source.  The NYPost story is not credible, as has been pointed out by many!

 

Read this.  Stunning.  But I'm not sure you'll care about it.

 

https://edition.cnn.com/2020/09/17/politics/bill-barr-donald-trump-attorney-general/index.html

You have really put yourself in a little box. Must be pretty safe in there.

Edited October 22, 2020 by canuckamuck

[polpott 5,102]

17 minutes ago, Sujo said:

It need metadata. Rudy has that

Or, more likely, not.

[steelepulse 5,831]

These Russians are so crafty, they even posed as Hunter's business partners and went to jail, all to spread some Russian disinformation.  

 

https://nypost.com/2020/10/22/hunter-biz-partner-confirms-e-mail-details-joe-bidens-push-to-make-millions-from-china/

 

He confirms that he was one of the recipients of the May 13, 2017, e-mail published by The Post eight days ago. That e-mail, from another partner in the group, laid out cash and equity positions and mysteriously included a 10 percent set-aside for “the big guy.”

[Jeffr2 7,327]

9 minutes ago, steelepulse said:

These Russians are so crafty, they even posed as Hunter's business partners and went to jail, all to spread some Russian disinformation.  

 

https://nypost.com/2020/10/22/hunter-biz-partner-confirms-e-mail-details-joe-bidens-push-to-make-millions-from-china/

 

He confirms that he was one of the recipients of the May 13, 2017, e-mail published by The Post eight days ago. That e-mail, from another partner in the group, laid out cash and equity positions and mysteriously included a 10 percent set-aside for “the big guy.”

The post is a sister company to Faux News.  Interesting comment on Wikipedia.

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_Post

The Post has been criticized since the beginning of Murdoch's ownership for sensationalism, blatant advocacy, and conservative bias. In 1980, the Columbia Journalism Review stated "New York Post is no longer merely a journalistic problem. It is a social problem—a force for evil."^[50]

 

The Post has been accused of contorting its news coverage to suit Murdoch's business needs, in particular avoiding subjects which could be unflattering to the government of the People's Republic of China, where Murdoch has invested heavily in satellite television.^[

[Jeffr2 7,327]

1 hour ago, canuckamuck said:

You have really put yourself in a little box. Must be pretty safe in there.

It is.  I avoid dodgy websites and conspiracy theories.  And lately, Trump supporters.  Especially ones who believe in QAnon.