U.S. cannot shield Trump from rape accuser's defamation lawsuit, judge rules

[Sujo]

4 hours ago, FarangULong said:

And the defamation suit is directly linked to some irrelevant "author" claiming she was raped, offering no proof whatsoever.

 

It's also - albeit indirectly - about how disgusting the civil litigation culture in the US is...

What has her occupation to do with it. Why not just refer to her as a woman. Your bias is showing.

 

She doesnt have to prove she was raped, she never made a criminal complaint. Its purely a defamation case.

[FarangULong]

5 minutes ago, Sujo said:

What has her occupation to do with it. Why not just refer to her as a woman. Your bias is showing.

 

She doesnt have to prove she was raped, she never made a criminal complaint. Its purely a defamation case.

She doesn't have to prove it = free license to slander.

[thaibeachlovers]

6 minutes ago, FarangULong said:

She doesn't have to prove it = free license to slander.

Welcome to the Brave New World coming along soon.

Edited November 3, 2020 by thaibeachlovers