Jump to content

PM insists he will not resign, saying he is not going to ‘abandon the country during crisis’


webfact

Recommended Posts

first you use your power to buy property, bank accounts around the world, and get about 100000 billion baht safe.   then you sit down and make everyone happy ... enemies are bad.  then say it's all to help the country

 

then you retire on a zillion baht.

 

reading about american CEO's giving themselves millions and then going bankrupt.   money..... money..... money.      follow it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, heist said:

or we could look at the facts and see how GDP has increased year on year ....   or how government spending has increased year on year ....   or how many projects have been implemented since Gen Khun Prayut Chan O Cha came to office as PM ....

 

As you can see ....  facts are facts .....   :  

image.png.f619815b487f19466accfc691d067b94.png

image.png.47118af2a74b479f6a898ce495665313.png

 

Thailand has performed quite well economically prior to the COVID19 pandemic. Since coming to power as PM Khun Prayut Chan O Cha has implemented hundreds of projects that have benefited the middle class and lower class income earners including farmers. GDP has increased year on year as shown.

Also, since 2014 Government spending has increased substantially as shown year on year with infrastructure projects such as SRT expansion and upgrade, Sea port redevelopment, MRT expansion, BTS extension, North Eastern Highway upgrade, Various rail links in progress, hundreds of smaller projects ongoing. 

Hundreds of thousands of jobs have been created due to these and many more projects, both directly and indirectly through suppliers and contractors. 

Also, The implementation of the EEC infrastructure projects, high-speed railway project that will connect the country’s three main airports – Don Mueang, Suvarnabhumi and U-tapao.

The third phase of the Map Ta Phut Port project is with select private sectors for maintenance, repair and overhaul centre project and U-tapao airport project.

Other infrastructure projects outside the EEC extend from four routes of heavy rail projects, six more routes of double-track railway projects, to light rail projects in Chiang Mai, Khon Kaen, Nakhon Ratchasima and Phuket provinces.

This government has fast tracked more development projects in the past 5 years than the previous governments tried to do over 10 yrs. 

Thailand's exports have increased year on year as shown below. This government is committed to ensure Thailand moves forward with GPD, exports both domestically and internationally, Job creation, infrustructure development, agricultural projects to assist rural farmers, new schools, bridges, road, rail and BTS, MRT, hospitals and many more.

  • Confused 7
  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mtls2005 said:

 

I'll stipulate that the Constitution du Jour is overly complex, so undertsand your confusion.

 

The people do not vote for the PM.

 

 

Yes, in theory you are right. Just like they didn't vote for Thaksin and his little sister. But apart from the technicalities people vote for the PM.

  • Confused 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At the time he took power it was needed and he did a good job for a year.

After that he has just clung onto power like every good megalomaniac dictator would do.

Made life a hell of a lot worse for the majority of the people.

This clown is up there with Robert Mugabe, Hitler, Gaddafi etc.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand that people don't think Prayut is perfect. Yes, correct.

But please compare the current government with the time when the fugitive and his little sister were in charge.

At that time we had all the time scandals and it was obvious that Thaksin worked mostly for Thaksin and his family, and he used Thailand to enrich himself. And he did that so obvious that many people were upset and demonstrated against him.

 

Now compare this with the current situation. Was there any major scandal with Prayut? The biggest scandal which I remember was the guy with all the watches. Bad, but not half as bad as many of Thaksin's scandals.

 

And since Prayut is in charge we don't see any red mob on the streets anymore. That's great news.

 

If people want a better PM, fine. Fight corruption and vote for decent honest people. If people would do that then Thailand would have a better government and a better PM. But instead most Thais vote again and again for the same corrupt politicians. And then they are surprised that they are governed by those corrupt politicians they votes for. TiT.

  • Confused 2
  • Sad 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, fishtank said:

Made life a hell of a lot worse for the majority of the people.

In which way?

2 minutes ago, fishtank said:

This clown is up there with Robert Mugabe, Hitler, Gaddafi etc.

Really? Is it possible that you have no idea about those dictators. Or was it something they told you in one of those red mob meetings.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Except that, no matter who the Thai's vote for, corrupt or not, they actually get who the military (who are beholden to the super wealthy) decide will govern them.

Some time ago people voted for Thaksin - or his party.

And Thaksin was in charge for several years.

And I am pretty sure Thaksin could be still in charge if he would have worked for all Thais and Thailand instead of enriching himself. Many people got upset and finally there was the coup. And many people supported that coup.

If Thaksin would have worked for Thailand and not his own pocket then I don't think that coup would have happend. And just in case it would have happened the masses would not have supported the coup.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ThailandRyan said:

Yet not one person would have voted for Prayut had he not self elected himself by conducting the Coup, and creating laws that protect himself and his cadre.  Tell me I am wrong

You are wrong.

Prayut was one of the available bad options. There was no good option.

Lots of people want stability and not violent red mobs on the street. That is one big reason why many voted for him.

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...