Jump to content

Thailand sees first trickle of tourists in October as curbs ease


webfact

Recommended Posts

Thailand sees first trickle of tourists in October as curbs ease

By Orathai Sriring

 

2020-11-26T053023Z_1_LYNXMPEGAP06B_RTROPTP_4_THAILAND-ECONOMY-TOURISM.JPG

A man walks on an almost empty beach which usually crowed with tourists following the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak in Pattaya, Thailand March 27, 2020. REUTERS/Soe Zeya Tun/File Photo

 

BANGKOK (Reuters) - Thailand recorded its first 1,201 foreign tourists in October since a ban in April aimed at averting coronavirus outbreaks, as the country gradually opens up to a select number of visitors to help its struggling, tourism-reliant economy.

 

Southeast Asia's second-largest economy contracted 6.4% in the third quarter from a year earlier after the second quarter's 12.1% slump as most virus restrictions were eased, but an absence of tourists is limiting the recovery.

 

The 1,201 foreign visitors in October is a fraction of the 3.07 million arrivals in the same month last year.

 

Tourism ministry data showed the latest visitors included 471 from China, 231 from neighbouring Cambodia, 178 from Middle East countries and 116 from Europe, all travelling on special 90-day visas that require two weeks of quarantine.

 

Thailand's entry restrictions have helped keep its coronavirus case tally to less than 4,000.

 

It plans to restart talks with China on a travel bubble to boost an economy the government predicts will shrink by 6% this year.

 

But the country has yet to agree any such arrangements and previous plans were abandoned in August after coronavirus cases in Asia increased.

 

New outbreaks have seen several other travel bubbles between Asia-Pacific countries aborted or fail to take off, including between New Zealand and Australia, and Hong Kong and Singapore.

 

In January-October 2020, the number of foreign tourists in Thailand dropped 79.5% to 6.69 million - there were zero tourists recorded in April-September.

 

The state planning agency has forecast 6.7 million foreign tourists this year after last year's revised record 39.9 million visitors who spent 1.91 trillion baht ($63 billion), or about 11.3% of gross domestic product (GDP).

 

It predicts only 5 million foreign visitors in 2021.

 

($1 = 30.33 baht)

 

(Reporting by Orathai Sriring; Editing by Martin Petty)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2020-11-26
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, webfact said:

It plans to restart talks with China on a travel bubble to boost an economy the government predicts will shrink by 6% this year.

be careful what you wish for, look at the Singapore/Hong Kong travel bubble situation, it says it all

 

 

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/hong-kong-singapore-travel-bubble-000511401.html

How much risk will a vital hub of global commerce entertain to open an important chunk of the economy? None, appears to be the answer, judging by the suspension of the Hong Kong-Singapore travel bubble on the eve of its debut.

 

https://news.yahoo.com/hong-kong-singapore-bubble-delay-055311379.html

Hong Kong, Singapore bubble delay highlights hurdles to travel recovery

 

SINGAPORE (Reuters) - A delay to Asia's first travel bubble between Hong Kong and Singapore has hit the shares of their flag carriers and highlighted the challenges facing the global travel industry as it tries to rebound from the pandemic.

The arrangement was postponed on Saturday, one day before it was due to launch, after Hong Kong reported a jump in coronavirus cases.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The numbers never add up. I recently returned on a flight with 45-60 passengers and  I did not see anyone that looked to be on a holiday.

And we were NOT, just returning ex-pats. And what a pile of you know what to achieve that.????

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, madmitch said:

Where have they got these figures from? Totally different from anything else I've seen.

 

Particularly since they previously announced - less than two weeks ago - that only 331 people entered on the STV in October. 1201 might be the total number of foreigners who arrived during the month, but only 417 of them (per TAT) entered on any type of tourist visa, and of those my guess is that 0% were actual "tourists" - they were people with homes or families or lives here who couldn't get a COE through any other means.

 

i would also bet dollars to donuts that the 231 Cambodians were laborers, not tourists.

Edited by khunjeff
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sharp said:

It's pretty obvious by now most if not all countries are waiting for the vaccine rollout before international travel gets moving of any noticeable degree. 

The problem for anyone from Europe or the US is that even if we are vaccinated we would still need to quarantine . there’s no evidence that tells us that we do not infect others when vaccinated. you are only protecting yourself. you could be a carrier. unless everyone in Thailand is vaccinated tourists will still be subject to quarantine . please tell me i’m wrong because I wish to return but will not quarantine for 2 weeks alone. no way. 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, webfact said:

Thailand recorded its first 1,201 foreign tourists in October since a ban in April aimed at averting coronavirus outbreaks, as the country gradually opens up to a select number of visitors to help its struggling, tourism-reliant economy.

I'm speechless... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, terryofcrete said:

The problem for anyone from Europe or the US is that even if we are vaccinated we would still need to quarantine . there’s no evidence that tells us that we do not infect others when vaccinated. you are only protecting yourself. you could be a carrier. unless everyone in Thailand is vaccinated tourists will still be subject to quarantine . please tell me i’m wrong because I wish to return but will not quarantine for 2 weeks alone. no way. 

I think that's probably right. Even with a vaccine a person can still contract or spread the virus. There have been very few details as to what 70 or 90 or 95% effectiveness means. Is that the percentage chance of avoiding contracting the virus, percentage chance of having lesser symptoms? Reduced chance of dying? If its been clarified I must have missed it. I am betting mandatory vaccination to travel but not necessarily resulting in removal of masks, social distancing, quarantine of travelers. I hope I'm wrong though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Thailand but I am going to stay in the good ole USA until the quarantine requirements are dropped. Quarantine is pretty much 14 days of hell for a guy like me, regardless of how luxurious the room is. Hopefully the vaccine puts an end to all this Bulshovic, but I'm not going to flinch if the theater goes on for another year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, webfact said:

Tourism ministry data showed the latest visitors included 471 from China, 231 from neighbouring Cambodia, 178 from Middle East countries and 116 from Europe, all travelling on special 90-day visas that require two weeks of quarantine.

So that is 471 businessmen looking for cheap property, 231 coming here to work and 294 "aliens" normally resident here prepared to pay and jump through the hoops to get back to their homes, families and businesses or get medical treatment...

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Bluedan said:

I think that's probably right. Even with a vaccine a person can still contract or spread the virus. There have been very few details as to what 70 or 90 or 95% effectiveness means. Is that the percentage chance of avoiding contracting the virus, percentage chance of having lesser symptoms? Reduced chance of dying? If its been clarified I must have missed it. I am betting mandatory vaccination to travel but not necessarily resulting in removal of masks, social distancing, quarantine of travelers. I hope I'm wrong though.

 

You're quite right, the meaning of the "effectiveness" statistics have not been explained well. The best description I've read was this article from Time, which said:

 

"[I]t’s important to understand what effectiveness means in [Pfizer's] and Moderna’s studies. Both measured their vaccines’ ability to prevent COVID-19 disease, not to stop infection from the virus.... But some people can be infected and never develop any symptoms, and in both the Pfizer and Moderna studies, these people would not have been tested.

 

"That means that the study did not necessarily compare how many total infections there were among those getting the vaccine and those receiving a placebo. For now, the 94.5% efficacy refers to the fact that among those who tested positive for COVID-19, the vaccine protected that percentage of people from getting disease v preventing them from getting infected with the virus in the first place."

 

 

Edited by khunjeff
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, khunjeff said:

 For now, the 94.5% efficacy refers to the fact that among those who tested positive for COVID-19, the vaccine protected that percentage of people from getting disease v preventing them from getting infected with the virus in the first place."

 

 

Interesting. But we already know that a significant proportion of people exposed to the virus don't get sick (without any vaccination) presumably due to prior immunity. So it has me scratching my head how they can calculate or claim this level of effectiveness. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here in Pattaya I see more and more new faces and also old snowbirds at my condominium complex. I also see an increasing number of Farangs walking from bars with a personal entertainer. 

 

It would be interesting to know how many tourists arrive on which visa from which country. Also it would be interesting to know how many of them tested positive and what happened with them. We get the daily statistics about people that have Corona. Why are tourists not included? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, chasboyuk said:

I have travelled around a fair bit since my return to LOS in late Sept.

 

All the hotels i have stayed only have Thai families very little expats and those are with Thai families.

I think this article is absolute crock shiiitee.

If there has been 1200+ tourists i would be gobsmacked 

 

It is possible that these famous tourists have also been counted expats who have returned with family to Thailand, so tourists are annual tourists but what matters are the numbers, this is Thailand where noting is seriously.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...