Jump to content

Biden names top economic team to focus on recovery from pandemic


webfact

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Just comparing Janet Yellon and Steven Mnuchin is like night and day. Janet's Brown University (AB) and Yale (MBA & PhD) and Steven's BA at Yale. Vast government experience against no experience for Steven. Got sued for asset stripping but qualified to be Trump's Treasury secretary as a wealthy loyalist. US economy will be in good hands under Janet Yellon if she passed congress.  

Mnuchin, like all other cabinet members under Trump, were just puppets.  Yes men.  They added no value other than following Trump's disastrous orders. And profiting off their positions like their boss.

Edited by Jeffr2
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Mick501 said:

Their advice to him will be do nothing.  Trump already has it moving in the right direction, replicating his stellar pre COVID .performance.  

Trump proved doing nothing was wrong.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once again we see a good example of a flawed election systèm whereby a President is unable to appoint key officials himself,  unlike any other democracy I know.

The Senate, likely to be as obstructive as possible under McConnell and where 70% represent 30% of the population will no doubt make life as difficult as possible for the new administration. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Mick501 said:

Their advice to him will be do nothing.  Trump already has it moving in the right direction, replicating his stellar pre COVID .performance.  

They'll want a real recovery, not just accumulation of more debt.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jonnapat said:

Once again we see a good example of a flawed election systèm whereby a President is unable to appoint key officials himself,  unlike any other democracy I know.

The Senate, likely to be as obstructive as possible under McConnell and where 70% represent 30% of the population will no doubt make life as difficult as possible for the new administration. 

Perhaps he'll do just what Trump did.  Make them all "appointed" only.  No senate approval required for that.  Then sign an executive order making appointments permanent. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Jonnapat said:

Once again we see a good example of a flawed election systèm whereby a President is unable to appoint key officials himself,  unlike any other democracy I know.

The Senate, likely to be as obstructive as possible under McConnell and where 70% represent 30% of the population will no doubt make life as difficult as possible for the new administration. 

So obstructive means imop the opposing party ,in this case republicans,  has differences as to how  their constituents  tax revenue  are to be spent "appropriately" ! IMOP  differences between parties are passionately  discussed ,its part of the democratic process 

Edited by riclag
txt
  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mick501 said:

Their advice to him will be do nothing.  Trump already has it moving in the right direction, replicating his stellar pre COVID .performance.  

I got news for you and the people who liked your post in one way or another and believe that they are Trump supporters. Trump disagrees with you. Seriously disagrees with you

.  “Congress must now do a Covid Relief Bill,” Trump tweeted. “Needs Democrats support. Make it big and focused"

Second stimulus checks: Trump pushes Congress to approve relief | myfox8.com

 

Second stimulus check update: Talks continue as Trump calls for going bigger. Here’s the latest.

Second stimulus check update: Talks continue as Trump calls for going bigger. Here’s the latest. - nj.com

 

Stimulus package update: Trump pushes for 'larger' COVID-19 relief bill, prioritizing $1,200 checks

Top Republicans are shrugging off the president's call and suggesting they are unwilling to push their offer much higher than $1 trillion.

Second stimulus: Trump pushes for 'larger' COVID-19 relief bill, prioritizing $1,200 checks - ABC7 Chicago

In fact it's been the GOP controlled Senate that's been opposed to a stimulus the size that Trump is calling for. And not even the Senate supports doing nothing.

Why do you pretend supporters of doing nothing hate Trump so much? Maybe you're just pretend supporters of Trump?

Edited by placeholder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, riclag said:

So obstructive means imop the opposing party ,in this case republicans,  has differences as to how  their constituents  tax revenue  are to be spent "appropriately" ! IMOP  differences between parties are passionately  discussed ,its part of the democratic process 

McConnell's senate has been the least productive this century.  He should resign.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, placeholder said:

For someone who claims not to like Trump, you seem somewhat amnesiac about Trump making Steve Mnuchin Treasury secretary. He worked for Goldman Sach's and after the 2008 economic crisis managed to evict lots of folks who couldn't make payment on their mortgages. 

And Trump also hired Wilbur Ross as commerce secretary

In the 1980s, Donald Trump's three casinos in Atlantic City were under threat of foreclosure from lenders. Ross, who was then the senior managing director of Rothschild & Co, represented investors in the casino. Along with Carl Icahn, Ross convinced bondholders to strike a deal that allowed Trump to keep control of the casinos.[13][15]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilbur_Ross

You'll find lots of other sleazy deeds of Ross if you follow that link.

 

More Gifts for Wall Street in Trump’s Latest Treasury Department Deregulation Blueprint

https://www.citizen.org/news/more-gifts-for-wall-street-in-trumps-latest-treasury-department-deregulation-blueprint/

 

Remember those banks that precipitated the 2008 crash?

Trump Moves to Roll Back Obama-Era Financial Regulations

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/03/business/dealbook/trump-congress-financial-regulations.html

 

How about this for sleaze?

Trump Administration Spares Corporate Wrongdoers Billions in Penalties

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/03/us/trump-sec-doj-corporate-penalties.html

 

Facts and truth do not intetest trump supporters.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Facts and truth do not intetest trump supporters.

They don't even necessarily know what Trump thinks. In another thread they supported doing nothing despite the resurgence of covid and the slowing again of the economy. Trump has repeatedly said he wants a big stimulus. Much more in line with the Democrats than the Republicans. To Trump supporters it's mostly about attitude and owning the libs. Not a lot of attention there to facts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thingamabob said:

Same old, same old. Back to the swamp.

Those swamp creatures in Trump's administration are a class of their own.

Peter Navarro, Dem turncoat and former global warming advocate turned denier.

Wilbur Ross, lied and overstated his personal fortune just like his boss.

Larry Kudlow, wrong on the tax cuts, economy and deficit.

Steven Mnuchin, no experience and unexceptional education but got the job because of loyalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Eric Loh said:

Those swamp creatures in Trump's administration are a class of their own.

Peter Navarro, Dem turncoat and former global warming advocate turned denier.

Wilbur Ross, lied and overstated his personal fortune just like his boss.

Larry Kudlow, wrong on the tax cuts, economy and deficit.

Steven Mnuchin, no experience and unexceptional education but got the job because of loyalty.

Bit mnuchin did get involved with wolf of wall street which was done by illegal funds from 1mdb from malaysia. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, stevenl said:

They'll want a real recovery, not just accumulation of more debt.

Hence why they should leave Trumps policies in place.  Biden spent 47 years doing nothing though, so fair chance that will be the way forward here.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Mick501 said:

Hence why they should leave Trumps policies in place.  Biden spent 47 years doing nothing though, so fair chance that will be the way forward here.

But Trump's policy is to get another big stimulus. Your notion is to do nothing as you stated earlier in this thread. That sets you against Trump. You Mitch McConnelling much? Or just very confused?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mick501 said:

Hence why they should leave Trumps policies in place.  Biden spent 47 years doing nothing though, so fair chance that will be the way forward here.

Trump's policies, which increased the debt tremendously, made the rich richer and managed to maintain the same growth curve as Obama's? So as a result tax paying Americans are paying to make the rich richer, while the tax payers children will have to face an unnecessary and tremendously increased debt? That policy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Mick501 said:

Their advice to him will be do nothing.  Trump already has it moving in the right direction, replicating his stellar pre COVID .performance.  

Sadly a couple of folks missed your sarcasm. LOL

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...