webfact Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 Police, court officials to have discussions ahead of ruling on PM BANGKOK (NNT) - Police and Constitutional Court officials will have a meeting this week, ahead of a court ruling affecting Prime Minister and Defense Minister, Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha, on Wednesday (Dec 2). He is accused of illegally occupying an army house since his retirement from military service. Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Bureau, Pol. Lt. Gen. Pakapong Pongpetra, said today that police officers are preparing security plans, as Khana Ratsadon demonstrators are to gather outside the Constitutional Court on Wednesday. The court is scheduled to read its ruling on whether Gen. Prayut has a conflict of interest in staying in the army house, after having retired from military service. Police and court officials will discuss security measures around the premises. The court may consider declaring some areas off-limits to protesters. The police have prepared security forces and plans to facilitate traffic and deal with the protest group. The Chief Government Whip, Wirat Rattanaset, expressed concern over the issue, as the Prime Minister is the head of the government. Mr. Wirat said the government will not discuss candidates who may serve as acting prime minister, until the court’s ruling is made. -- © Copyright NNT 2020-12-01 - Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you - Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Hayduke Posted December 1, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 1, 2020 (edited) 33 minutes ago, webfact said: Police, court officials to have discussions ahead of ruling on PM Because everyone knows that the fix is in and the result is a foregone conclusion. This will only prove the protesters right once again..and pour more fuel on the protest fires. This stupid, narcissistic, egomaniac remains determined to drag the country down further…and further...and further. Edited December 1, 2020 by Hayduke 11 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rkidlad Posted December 1, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 1, 2020 6 minutes ago, webfact said: The police have prepared security forces and plans to facilitate traffic and deal with the protest group Yes, those inflatable yellow ducks look very scary! 1 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Misterwhisper Posted December 1, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 1, 2020 In my home country we call people who illegally occupy houses "squatters". Here they call them "prime ministers" or "retired generals". Ah, cultural differences... 18 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post colinneil Posted December 1, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 1, 2020 It will be a very sad day for this country of the court rules in Prayuts favour. Staying in the army house after retiring, or should i say after seizing power with a coup, shows how arrogant the man is, he thinks he can do want he wants, thinks he is above the law. Nobody is above the law, oops silly me he makes up laws to suit himself. 13 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ikke1959 Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 Everybody has to follow the law, he told it himself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesofa Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 5 minutes ago, colinneil said: It will be a very sad day for this country of the court rules in Prayuts favour. Staying in the army house after retiring, or should i say after seizing power with a coup, shows how arrogant the man is, he thinks he can do want he wants, thinks he is above the law. Nobody is above the law, oops silly me he makes up laws to suit himself. That's only after retarding retiring from the army, not the government. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post phetphet Posted December 1, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 1, 2020 Pity gambling is illegal here. I wouldn't mind a bet on what the court's decision will be. 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyler Visan Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 Did no-one in his 'Team' say to him quietly a year or so ago, hey Mr P you might be safer moving house? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anchadian Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 (edited) 58 minutes ago, phetphet said: Pity gambling is illegal here. I wouldn't mind a bet on what the court's decision will be. I doubt you would even get a price. Edited December 1, 2020 by anchadian Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Misterwhisper Posted December 1, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 1, 2020 1 hour ago, bluesofa said: That's only after retarding retiring from the army, not the government. Perhaps a question of semantics: Is an ex-general a retired retard, or is he a retarded retiree? 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post RichardColeman Posted December 1, 2020 Popular Post Share Posted December 1, 2020 (edited) I'm less surprised by the almost certain outcome of this, than surprised we can actually comment on this story ! Edited December 1, 2020 by RichardColeman 3 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bluesofa Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 49 minutes ago, Misterwhisper said: Perhaps a question of semantics: Is an ex-general a retired retard, or is he a retarded retiree? My money's on the former. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 2 hours ago, Misterwhisper said: Perhaps a question of semantics: Is an ex-general a retired retard, or is he a retarded retiree? Qualifies both positions ... as he did before. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hotchilli Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 4 hours ago, ikke1959 said: Everybody has to follow the law, he told it himself He will offer to move-out as soon as the Dhara Dhevi Hotel becomes available. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RJRS1301 Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 4 hours ago, ikke1959 said: Everybody has to follow the law, he told it himself He was granted tpermission to stay though, conflict of interest "yes" Illegal questionable since he was granted it as "grace and favour" from the army Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry343 Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 7 hours ago, webfact said: Police, court officials to have discussions ahead of ruling on PM BANGKOK (NNT) - Police and Constitutional Court officials will have a meeting this week, ahead of a court ruling affecting Prime Minister and Defense Minister, Gen. Prayut Chan-o-cha, on Wednesday (Dec 2). He is accused of illegally occupying an army house since his retirement from military service. Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Bureau, Pol. Lt. Gen. Pakapong Pongpetra, said today that police officers are preparing security plans, as Khana Ratsadon demonstrators are to gather outside the Constitutional Court on Wednesday. The court is scheduled to read its ruling on whether Gen. Prayut has a conflict of interest in staying in the army house, after having retired from military service. Police and court officials will discuss security measures around the premises. The court may consider declaring some areas off-limits to protesters. The police have prepared security forces and plans to facilitate traffic and deal with the protest group. The Chief Government Whip, Wirat Rattanaset, expressed concern over the issue, as the Prime Minister is the head of the government. Mr. Wirat said the government will not discuss candidates who may serve as acting prime minister, until the court’s ruling is made. -- © Copyright NNT 2020-12-01 - Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you - Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates It looks as if the court ruling is already known Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry343 Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 It seems that the court ruling may already be known, as court officials and police prepare on ways of handling the protester when the court rules in the Prime Ministers favour. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rebo Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 13 hours ago, Misterwhisper said: In my home country we call people who illegally occupy houses "squatters". Here they call them "prime ministers" or "retired generals". Ah, cultural differences... In my home country we call people who were proven to having been involved in illegally bringing large quantities of heroin into the country „convicted drug dealers“. Here they call them „ministers“ and „chairmen“. In my home country we call people who ... 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Soikhaonoiken Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 12 hours ago, Tyler Visan said: Did no-one in his 'Team' say to him quietly a year or so ago, hey Mr P you might be safer moving house? They probably did, but his answer would have been... Do you know who I am... ???? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happyman567 Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 15 hours ago, phetphet said: Pity gambling is illegal here. I wouldn't mind a bet on what the court's decision will be. Me to He is odds on to win 100000000000000 to lose Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammieuk1 Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 Do squatters have rights here or will some be made up???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 A post trolling about Mr. Trump has been removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brianthainess Posted December 2, 2020 Share Posted December 2, 2020 22 hours ago, webfact said: ruling on whether Gen. Prayut has a conflict of interest in staying in the army house, after having retired from military service. Conflict of interest? What! our beloved leader his eminence, head of all ministry's, who has never told a lie, and believes in democracy. nah surely not. IF he ever appears in court what to wear will be a big decision for him. Any bets on what he'll wear. I'm going with this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now