Jump to content

Charter Court acquits PM Prayut Chan-o-cha


webfact

Recommended Posts

Logic yes, but why the subterfuge. Just say it is the PM's temporary PM mansion while the other is completely retrofitted and remodeled to get it in the right perspective. Of course he gets security and a staff just like most heads of State. Instead they played a game and could care less what the normal people thought.  Looks mean everything in the real world. This government has been anything but above board with their goings on.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course the court rejected it, did anyone expect anything different to happen other than to get this result? The courts have already been instructed to clear his name by people higher up than him that have power to command such a ruling. Fire one conclusions bf a complete waste of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Venom said:

BTW - In the photo I see he's wearing a mask with a one way valve, these only offer protection to the wearer and zero protection against spreading Covid to others. ????

Of course. I imagine when he was at the pharmacy this was specifically the kind of mask he asked for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a disgrace. I said on the other thread this would be the verdict as soon as he announced in advance that he'd accept the decision. He never would have said that unless he knew the result and the result was favourable to him.

 

Corrupt from top to bottom.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, scorecard said:

And I suspect he doesn't understand he can't just do whatever pleases him, he seems to believe that he doesn't need to follow rules, regulations, laws, ethics and morals, because he's special.

 

He doesnt understand or he just doesnt care?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the only thing that surprises me is that the courts didn't suggest dissolving the opposition party. I mean, they are only there as token for the international stage. They are inert. The PM now has a clear run to openly do whatever he wants.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, RJRS1301 said:

No there is a surprise for an "independent body"

Wonder how many former army generals appointed to that court?

 

Most probably five army generals so they form the majority. Appointed by the country's chief strategist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, scorecard said:

And I suspect he doesn't understand he can't just do whatever pleases him, he seems to believe that he doesn't need to follow rules, regulations, laws, ethics and morals, because he's special.

Whether he understands or not, he certainly can do whatever pleases him. This verdict helps prove that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Prayuth is quoted having said "I've served the country all my life. Most importantly, I'm the prime minister, and security is necessary. It's important that there be an appropriate place for the leader of the country."

 

My version would read "Thailand has served me all my life. Since I haven't been the army chief since September 2014 and came to power through a coup, I also do not deserve to live in an army house for free and am entitled to as much security as everyone else."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, StefanBBK said:

What difference does it make? I can see the logic behind staying at Armee Housing. 

The difference may be retired Civilians vs Government Officials responsible for Defense Budgets. It seems as logic that the Charter Court is relying on the former vs the latter. 

Thr Charter Court was created and sustained by the military. To avoid the appearance of conflict of interest, it should as a minimum recuse itself from making any ruling in Prayut's case, referring the case to the lower courts to establish the arguments for evidence pro and con. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, johnarth said:

as mentioned by everybody waist of money and time as would be in any country regarding the PM, but is does wake-up a lot more Thais as to how things are in Thailand which works against the PM and his government

'waist of money':

Amazon.com: Money Belt - RFID Blocking Money Belt | Safe ...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ThailandRyan said:

Logic yes, but why the subterfuge. Just say it is the PM's temporary PM mansion while the other is completely retrofitted and remodeled to get it in the right perspective.

As a side note (I still think he should have been removed from office), Thai people believe that the PM's mansion is haunted and all Prime Ministers have refused to live there.

 

There was one prime minister who used the mansion, I think his name was Chuan. He was known to never use the bedroom and slept on a sofa in his office!

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...