Jump to content

Prosecutors clear white police officer over Jacob Blake shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin


webfact

Recommended Posts

Prosecutors clear white police officer over Jacob Blake shooting in Kenosha, Wisconsin

By Brendan O'Brien

 

Reuters.jpg

Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley leads a news conference to announce a decision on whether any of the Kenosha Police Officers involved in the August 23, 2020 shooting of Black man Jacob Blake will face criminal charges, in Kenosha, Wisconsin, U.S. January 5, 2021. REUTERS/Daniel Acker

 

KENOSHA, Wisc. (Reuters) - Prosecutors on Tuesday cleared a white police officer in the Aug. 23 shooting of Jacob Blake, a Black man, in Kenosha, Wisconsin, an incident that touched off deadly street protests and inflamed racial tensions in the United States.

 

The decision by Kenosha County District Attorney Michael Graveley not to charge police officer Rusten Sheskey with any crime could incite more demonstrations, which have frequently broken out in the United States in recent years after police have been cleared of wrongdoing in shootings of African Americans.

 

During a police intervention in a domestic dispute that was captured on cellphone video, Sheskey shot at Blake's back seven times from close range as Blake opened the door of his car, striking him four times and paralyzing him from the waist down.

 

Officials said there was a knife inside Blake's car, and Graveley said Sheskey had the right to self-defense.

 

Blake's lawyer, Ben Crump, said Blake was attempting to break up a fight between two women when he was shot in front of three of his sons, aged 3, 5 and 8.

 

At the height of the protests that followed, teenager Kyle Rittenhouse opened fire with a Smith & Wesson M&P 15 rifle, killing two men and wounding another. Rittenhouse, now 18, was charged with first-degree reckless homicide and five other criminal counts.

 

Earlier Tuesday, Rittenhouse pleaded not guilty to all counts in an appearance by video in Kenosha County Circuit Court.

 

(Reporting by Brendan O'Brien; Additional reporting by Gabriella Borter; Writing by Daniel Trotta; Editing by Rosalba O'Brien and Grant McCool)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2021-01-06
 
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sad to say, but I don't think the guy gave the cop too many options.  He had the door open, hopping into a 3000 pound weapon.  The cop with no taser had a choice of letting him drive off, tackling him at great personal risk (knife in car) or shooting him.

 

God knows how many people the guy could have killed once he was behind the wheel.

 

  • Confused 3
  • Sad 6
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, impulse said:

Sad to say, but I don't think the guy gave the cop too many options.  He had the door open, hopping into a 3000 pound weapon.  The cop with no taser had a choice of letting him drive off, tackling him at great personal risk (knife in car) or shooting him.

 

God knows how many people the guy could have killed once he was behind the wheel.

 

7 times in the back?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Natai Beach said:

Nothing new here. 
police kills a black guy

police say they will investigate 

police find the killer cop innocent

let the rioting begin

 

and repeat.

Police kills a white guy

Police says it will investigate

Police finds the killer cop innocent

No rioting

 

Spot the difference.

 

Police are colour blind and so should we all be.

Amen

  • Like 2
  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, surfinglife said:

Police kills a white guy

Police says it will investigate

Police finds the killer cop innocent

No rioting

 

Spot the difference.

 

Police are colour blind and so should we all be.

Amen

Yeah.  That happens like 1 in 500 cases.  Read up on the problems with the police in the US.  A big part is the strength of the union which helps them from being fired or going to jail.  That needs to change.  Enough is enough.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, surfinglife said:

Police kills a white guy

Police says it will investigate

Police finds the killer cop innocent

No rioting

 

Spot the difference.

 

Police are colour blind and so should we all be.

Amen

"Police are colour blind"

Do you really believe that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Natai Beach said:

Nothing new here. 
police kills a black guy

police say they will investigate 

police find the killer cop innocent

let the rioting begin

 

and repeat.

Has nothing to do with 'color'.

 

Police give instruction, 

Person refuses to follow instruction,

Person reaches for 'something' hidden from sight,

Person gets shot.

Person is Black, let the rioting begin.  The race card has been dealt.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

Has nothing to do with 'color'.

 

Police give instruction, 

Person refuses to follow instruction,

Person reaches for 'something' hidden from sight,

Person gets shot.

Person is Black, let the rioting begin.  The race card has been dealt.

Sounds a bit racist.  I guarantee you have NO idea what it's like to be a person of color in the US.  Doubt you'd like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

Being black is a terrible fate in America. Always has been. I have many black friends, and have witnessed the poor treatment and profiling firsthand. 


 

what is it about American culture that makes it this way? Why do people put up with it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, spidermike007 said:

he was in the process of driving away

Maybe you should watch the video again. He was clearly reaching for 'something'. He failed to follow the police instructions. I'm very sad for Blake, but the officer has the right to react. At no time was Blake attempting to "drive away".

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

Maybe you should watch the video again. He was clearly reaching for 'something'. He failed to follow the police instructions. I'm very sad for Blake, but the officer has the right to react. At no time was Blake attempting to "drive away".

So reaching for 'something' warrants getting shot in the back 7 times in front of your children?  Seriously?  You've got to be kidding.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/09/us/police-shooting-video-arizona.html

 

Probably not completely color blind. They actually kill whites, too. No riots.

You don't get it.  Police injustice against persons of color is real.  And well documented.

 

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6080222/

Victims were majority white (52%) but disproportionately black (32%) with a fatality rate 2.8 times higher among blacks than whites. Most victims were reported to be armed (83%); however, black victims were more likely to be unarmed (14.8%) than white (9.4%) or Hispanic (5.8%) victims.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The OP article here is pretty thin on details and explanation of the prosecutor's rationale...

 

But a couple things stand out:

 

--Did Blake have a knife in his hand when he was shot?  AFAIK, the answer is no. The argues in favor of the shooting being unjustified.

 

--If Blake didn't have the knife in his hand at the time of the shooting, weren't there other methods/actions less severe the officer could have taken to restrain Blake than shooting him in the back multiple times.

 

--Wonder if the incoming U.S. Justice Department Civil Rights Division can review the local prosecutor's decision and consider their own case against the officer involved.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

So reaching for 'something' warrants getting shot in the back 7 times in front of your children?  Seriously?  You've got to be kidding.

You're the officer. Turns out the "something" is a gun. You get shot. Maybe you go home. Maybe you don't. Still has nothing to do with race or color. Has everything to do with following instructions.

Edited by AgMech Cowboy
spelling correction
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AgMech Cowboy said:

Your the officer. Turns out the "something" is a gun. You get shot. Maybe you go home. Maybe you don't. Still has nothing to do with race or color. Has everything to do with following instructions.

You don't seem to understand the race problem in the US.  Did you read my article?  Doubt it....

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-53954181

While there is no specific rule for every single scenario, both experts note that as far as we know, Mr Blake was not being arrested or wanted for any heinous crime (like mass murder).

 

Prof Burkhalter adds that in the moments leading up to the shots, officers "passed through several decision points where, arguably, they could have made more effective decisions", like tackling him or tasing him again.

 

"When someone resists arrest and they attempt to walk away, which happens often...that in and of itself is not carte blanche to use deadly physical force, period."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...