Jump to content

Why vaccianate everybody instead of just 10-20%?


gafdtomaka366

Recommended Posts

Just now, Peter Denis said:

You can be 'responsible' all you like, I make up my own mind using the full weight of science (but the part you don't seem to know) to not go along in this vaccine-solution madness.

Cool, certainly not going to try and persuade you to change your mind.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, ezzra said:

Your argument doesn't hold water when it comes to possible mutations of the virus that are far more contagious and deadly than the current covid-19 one...

Your argument doesn’t hold water. How do you know that the vaccine will be effective against different strains of the virus. In which case people who had already had the vaccine would be more vulnerable than people waiting for the new improved vaccine.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Spanish Flu epidemic lasted for 1918 = 1920. It then 'disappeared' as mysteriously as it had first appeared.

 

Of course, it didn't disappear, but its genetic material was incorporated into other viral strains. The original virus was unable to spread as herd immunity took over and less dangerous forms were incorporated into the human population's 'genetic resistance'.

 

A virus that is spread by people to people contact, with a short incubation period and high fatality rate will be initially disastrous, but the epidemic is likely to be over in a relatively short period simply because those most susceptible will be dead and no longer able to pass on the virus. The rest of the population will willingly self-isolate to prevent the spread of the virus and it will eventually die off.

 

In contrast, a similar virus, but with a long incubation period and that is not fatal, is likely to find a happy home in the human population for a long period of time.

 

Both viruses will mutate. Some strains will increase fatalities and other strains will be less harmful. Inevitably, natural selection will favour those strains that are less harmful and these strains/genetic material will continue to persist. Eventually they will become incorporated into the immunological 'memory' of the human genome.

 

A vaccine is like getting a very mild version of the virus and contributes to this societal immunity. It accelerates the whole herd immunity response. Those who choose not to vaccinate, in a strict Darwinian sense, are holding back humanity. There are probably no consequences for them, or their children, but the risk of a resurgent strain decimating subsequent generations is very slightly increased. If enough people do not vaccinate, the increased risk may be significant.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, natway09 said:

But "my choice, my life" is a very selfish one & I trust you never want to travel internationally  in  the forseeable future. I hope you are not allowed anyway

The cost of treatment should you contract , I hope will be met by yourself or do you expect "the nanny state" to pay

You are assuming that if you contract it you are hospitalized. This is not the most likely outcome.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tribalfusion001 said:

"are holding back humanity" you should work for the government propaganda departments with this level of coercion. Plenty of countries are doing fine without any lockdowns and only giving vaccines to those who need them. Forcing or coercing vaccines onto people will not achieve what you are talking about, quite the opposite it will polarize opinion and divide society.

Please name the countries "doing fine", also the level of infection per head of population and the mortality rate.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, tribalfusion001 said:

You don't seem to understand a large proportion do not want the vaccines and will refuse them. Your point of view and your fear of this virus is what's driving this agenda. I live my life and I don't want a covid vaccine. You are advocating medical fascism by saying remain part of society, who are you to decide who is remain part of society for a mild virus, yes mild, 98% of those who die have underlying conditions.

If you don’t want the vaccine then fine. You should also me made to sign a document saying that you do not want any medical treatment if you catch Covid. You made that choice.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Pro1Expat said:

If what you say is true and I have no idea if it is or not, this must be the first virus to ever mutate into something far more dangerous. Which other virus do you know of that has mutated into a more dangerous strain? I have never heard of any virus doing it.

The common cold mutates virtually all of the time which is why there is no vaccine for it. As the Covid virus comprises, among others, the cold virus which is a Corona virus, how is a vaccine ever going to be effective?

If anyone can explain this I would be very interested to hear it

Ever heard of Spanish flu?

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Peter Denis said:

You can be 'responsible' all you like, I make up my own mind using the full weight of science (but the part you don't seem to know) to not go along in this vaccine-solution madness.

Please can you tell us where you studied medicine and where you specialized in infectious diseases. I would be interested to know.

Edited by Throatwobbler
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Elkski said:

The number of ignorant people doesn't surprise me after the last two elections in the US.   It's same here.   Yes the world is doomed with so much ignorance

I agree with you.  But when talking about covid-19 measures and vaccination, it's likely that we are actually referring to different 'ignorant' groups. 

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Peter Denis said:

I agree with you.  But when talking about covid-19 measures and vaccination, it's likely that we are actually referring to different 'ignorant' groups. 

I think he is talking about the same ignorant groups. Some people don’t realise that they are in one of the groups.

Edited by Throatwobbler
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

Your life, Your choice, as you wrote - but that surely must come with conditions if you wish to remain part of society.

 

I am not an anti-vaxer, I have my annual flu shots, last year I also got my first pneumonia shot, due again this year for the flu shot + booster for pneumonia, although I will go for the Covid vax instead of the flu shot, only makes sense to, these are my choices and of course don't affect society.

 

I understand what you are saying, however you cannot place conditions on people because they don't wish to be vaccinated, in Australia the government stops payments to parents if they don't vaccinate their kids, and pay those that do, that in itself is wrong in my opinion.

 

We all have a right to live in society, there are those of us that will vaccinate, not because we wish to protect others, but because we want to protect ourselves first, call that selfish, but its the honest truth, however it is up to those who don't vaccinate that take the risk, remembering that those of us that do get vaccinated with Covid-19 offer no protection to those who do not vaccinated, or anyone else for that matter.

 

The above said, if Covid-19 was a virus that killed everyone who didn't want to vaccinate, then that in itself would sort things out, this vaccination will only protect those who have been vaccinated, not 100%, up to 95%, 90% even as low as 52% depending on which vaccination you take.

 

We have no control on hospitals being over run by those who choose not to be vaccinated, although I suppose hospital staff can decide who is to be treated first, i.e. the heart attack victim, the stroke victim, the car accident victim or the Covid victim, what I am saying, is it shouldn't be too hard if you follow what I mean, sort of like an alcoholic always ending up in the hospital, being put into an educed coma in the ICU ward only to return time and time again, eventually they will prescribe him with a couple of pills and tell him to sleep it off, (self inflicted), harsh, but it is the reality, they need the ICU ward for people who do not self inflict themselves with whatever.

 

So those that don't get vaccinated still have a choice, as for me, well, if and when I get vaccinated, hopefully I won't have that problem, and if I do end up catching it, at least I can say, hey guys I did get vaxed, no doubt they would allow me in for treatment as opposed to sending me home with some pills.

 

Got to be cruel to be kind as they say.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, simple1 said:

 

Reason being non vaccinated children can be carriers and infect others in the community at great financial cost to government and those infected.

 

 

Incorrect, those vaccinated provide mitigation from Covid infection for the non vaccinated

Ok, agree on your first point, kids should be vaccinated then, especially if they can be carriers and spread it to other kids.

 

The second point depends what you read: People who have received a Covid-19 vaccine could still pass the virus on to others and should continue following lockdown rules, England's deputy chief medical officer has warned.1 day ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

+ 1 for the post above [ukrules]

 

Vaccinate the elderly and those in high risk groups first (which they are doing).

i.e. 80+ high risk, then 70+ then 60+ etc

 

In addition to what ukrules has written... 

 

Even though statistically a person is younger than 60 is at less risk of serious symptoms related to Covid-19 there is still a risk. There has been talk of additional risk of thrombosis etc.. and no one wants a horrible flu that knocks them on their backside for a week or more, the same for Covid-19. If the vaccine means we only suffer mild (or no) symptoms vs being stuck in bed for 5 days etc then we should all take it. 

 

I want to see everyone vaccinated as soon as possible so I can get back to travel without quarantine.

 

I want to see the world get back to as close to normal as soon possible. 

 

Even though people suggest that we can make our own minds up and take the risk if we want to be vaccinated or expose ourselves to Covid-19, some suggest its their choice. But, what they are failing to recognise in their selfishness is that if they become sick and need hospitalisation they are using up vital resources needed for others. 

 

 

 

Only western countries immunize old, frail ones first. Asian countries with healthcare workers. This is how it shld be. Many doctors/nurses fell/fall ill, have died. 90 year olds don't care for sick ppl. Med. staff does. They should have priority.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...