Jump to content

Trump lawyer Giuliani faces $1.3 billion lawsuit over 'big lie' election fraud claims


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Jillie Norman said:

I know they're doing this all for a reason but it gets it really tiring especially to the people. Can't we just stop and move on? It's hard to start anew if everyone's thinking of something to put someone else down? Someone needs to stop and not pass on the grudge.

I am sure you understand that the explanation was given as to why previuosly promised targets may fall short due to the previous administration failure to plan and risk manage. That is a reason , not blaming.

Funny though the previous administration never ceased to negatively comment about the Obama administration , while it chipped around the edges undermining social and community achievements and undermining the financial systems which had been successful in many areas, and taking qudos for improvements which had nothing to do with them.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, bendejo said:

 

If there was even a smidgen of evidence of real election fraud it would have been brought forth by now.  Remember when one of their arguments was that someone counting the ballots was rude to an observer?  The best witness they could find was that drunk lady, but at least she was entertaining.

carone.jpg.f09238a3dc3eee375e5c712b6db7b525.jpg

 

 

???Lady?? female/woman yes, her behaviour did not behoove a "lady".

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And around the 2018 midterms a lot of the MSM did extensive investigative pieces about how insecure the voting machines are. (Not just Dominion)

 

Here’s just one…  NPR.  Real Trump fanboys.  In 2019.

 

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/04/755066523/cyber-experts-warn-of-vulnerabilities-facing-2020-election-machines

 

Strangely, they've gone quiet now that the results have swung the other way.  But I digress.

 

You can pull up half a dozen YouTubes of guys who bought current model voting machines at government surplus auctions, took them home and showed how easy it is to hack them.  (Again, not just Dominion)

 

The NSA has been hacked.  The US military has been hacked.  If I’m to believe some of the Discovery documentaries, they have rooms full of people sitting at terminals to catch intrusions.  Does Dominion?   An Iranian uranium plant with an air gap was hacked.  City, county and state agencies are hacked all the time.

 

Is it really hard to imagine that, even if Dominion did the very best they could, it’s possible some of their machines were hacked?  Maybe the usual suspects, but just as likely to have been China or Russia or N Korea. 

 

Bottom line, one side wants to do a transparent deep dive into the machines to see if there were any problems.  The other side is resisting, kicking and screaming, claiming no evidence.  What could they possibly have to lose by an open and transparent forensic analysis of the machines?    If they’re clean- a lot of the animosity of the 40% of skeptical voters goes away.  If they were hacked, it needs to be fixed before the next election.

 

Good news...  The discovery process for these lawsuits.

 

 

  • Sad 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, placeholder said:

No amount of evidence and reason is going to dissuade these voters from what are, functionally speaking, their religious convictions.

Whilst at first sight it might seem bizarre to equate the belief that the election was stolen with religious convictions, one must then consider how bizarre some of their actual religious convictions are!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, RichardColeman said:

Hence my comment of the stupidity of suing someone for more than they are worth and the intelligence of a legal team that know they cannot get what they are asking for !

First, they're sending a message.  And that's fantastic.  Fake news should have a financial penalty and it will dissuade others from doing the same.

 

Second, it's a negotiation.  And since you have no idea who the legal team is, how can you judge their intelligence?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, impulse said:

 

And around the 2018 midterms a lot of the MSM did extensive investigative pieces about how insecure the voting machines are. (Not just Dominion)

 

Here’s just one…  NPR.  Real Trump fanboys.  In 2019.

 

https://www.npr.org/2019/09/04/755066523/cyber-experts-warn-of-vulnerabilities-facing-2020-election-machines

 

Strangely, they've gone quiet now that the results have swung the other way.  But I digress.

 

You can pull up half a dozen YouTubes of guys who bought current model voting machines at government surplus auctions, took them home and showed how easy it is to hack them.  (Again, not just Dominion)

 

The NSA has been hacked.  The US military has been hacked.  If I’m to believe some of the Discovery documentaries, they have rooms full of people sitting at terminals to catch intrusions.  Does Dominion?   An Iranian uranium plant with an air gap was hacked.  City, county and state agencies are hacked all the time.

 

Is it really hard to imagine that, even if Dominion did the very best they could, it’s possible some of their machines were hacked?  Maybe the usual suspects, but just as likely to have been China or Russia or N Korea. 

 

Bottom line, one side wants to do a transparent deep dive into the machines to see if there were any problems.  The other side is resisting, kicking and screaming, claiming no evidence.  What could they possibly have to lose by an open and transparent forensic analysis of the machines?    If they’re clean- a lot of the animosity of the 40% of skeptical voters goes away.  If they were hacked, it needs to be fixed before the next election.

 

Good news...  The discovery process for these lawsuits.

 

 

You should read the article.  You missed the point completely.  And misrepresented it.

 

They were talking about the hiring of hackers to test the machines.  Specifically:

 

Quote

The machine he's investigating is a ballot-marking device used to help people with physical impairments or language barriers vote, and it's running a version of Windows that is more than 15 years old.

 

Seems you glean from that article what you want.  Doubt you even read it.

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, stevenl said:

"What could they possibly have to lose by an open and transparent forensic analysis of the machines?    If they’re clean- a lot of the animosity of the 40% of skeptical voters goes away.  If they were hacked, it needs to be fixed before the next election."

This has been done, extensively already. The animosity doesn't go away and will not go away until the people responsible for this 'fake election' outcry admit there was nothing to it 

You think they will admit it was all BS//??

That woud cause loss of face, and you know , living in Asia how that is, now multiply by 1000% and you have the humiliation that 45 and its enablers will feel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

You think they will admit it was all BS//??

That woud cause loss of face, and you know , living in Asia how that is, now multiply by 1000% and you have the humiliation that 45 and its enablers will feel. 

No, they'll never admit it, so this whole nonsense is here to stay.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2021 at 4:32 AM, RichardColeman said:

Just showing the stupidity of the US civil legal system - $1.3 billion ? I mean what's the point of suing someone (rightly or wrongly) for $1.255 billion more than a guy is worth (according to wiki) ? 

The point is to destroy someone.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/26/2021 at 4:32 AM, RichardColeman said:

Just showing the stupidity of the US civil legal system - $1.3 billion ? I mean what's the point of suing someone (rightly or wrongly) for $1.255 billion more than a guy is worth (according to wiki) ? 

They want to be able to attach at least his next six lifetimes. Knowing what a skeeze he has been, he'll easily reincarnate as himself.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

When Dominion announced these lawsuits, they sent notices to many media outlets.  Fox, OANN, Newsmax, etc.  If you noticed, NO articles or mentions about vote fraud with these machines was posted after that.  An immediate stop.

 

Fox has told employees to not discard anything related to this.  Sure hope Dominion sues them.  Hannity is on the lawsuit though.  Fantastic!  He's a disgusting individual profiting off misinformation.

 

I heard the same request was made to the WH.  Employees were told not to discard documents related to this.

 

Ailes had a rule of picking targets that probably won't strike back, like people who can't afford lawsuits.  This time it was Powell who led them into it and followed her over the ledge.  Bye-bye.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...