Jump to content
BANGKOK
dbrenn

Story Of My Thai Citizenship Application

Recommended Posts

Would a business not need to show significant activity/profits? Or do they only care about the salary you take out?


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
27 minutes ago, NewlyMintedThai said:

Would a business not need to show significant activity/profits? Or do they only care about the salary you take out?


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

The revenue department would want to see a profit but you could easily lose money the 1st couple years. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Anyone know how long it would take after the oath to ID on an average? 

See my post #4825 - 5 to 7 months recently.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/2/2019 at 11:14 AM, david143 said:

on 30 July 2019
30 กรกฎาคม 2562

Meeting held for Interview for Nationality.

 

FYI

Seems to be happening every last week of the month, which would make the next one in 3 weeks.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, looks like there was an update to laws published in the RG on 30 July regarding applying for Thai citizenship. In addition to some more administrative hoops to jump through, such as attaining the pink ID card, a major change seems to be the added requirement to have lived in Thailand for no less than 10 years. No mention about length of stay for those married to Thai citizens. If someone knows better than me, please enlighten us. Thanks!  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 minutes ago, echrist said:

Someone correct me if I'm wrong, looks like there was an update to laws published in the RG on 30 July regarding applying for Thai citizenship. In addition to some more administrative hoops to jump through, such as attaining the pink ID card, a major change seems to be the added requirement to have lived in Thailand for no less than 10 years. No mention about length of stay for those married to Thai citizens. If someone knows better than me, please enlighten us. Thanks!  

That pink non Thai ID, although useless, takes about 10 min to get, as already got the house book.

I'd guess that all gong for citizenship the PR route have lived in Thailand 10+ years.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, echrist said:

In case anyone is interested, I've attached the announcement. 

 

T_0027.PDF 112.46 kB · 3 downloads

Thank you for this. I was going to conduct my first trial to submit the documents tomorrow morning - I'll read this first.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
In case anyone is interested, I've attached the announcement. 
 
T_0027.PDF
Maybe someone with good thai command can check whats this 10 year requirement mean and how it's calculated?

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, sas_cars said:

Maybe someone with good thai command can check whats this 10 year requirement mean and how it's calculated?

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

These are the changes that I consider important:

 

1 (1) Applicant has to submit a copy of the pink card

1 (2) Applicants have to submit a certificate [I don't understand this but think it is a medical certificate of sorts:] หนังสือรับรองความเป็นคนไร้รากเหง้า
1 (3) Applicant has to prove that they have been in the Kingdom not less than 10 years. [They are giving a list of examples how you can prove that.]

1 (4) Proof that the applicant appreciates the democratic monarchy, for example if they have contributed to society [I am not sure what that means]

2, 2.2 Three character witnesses who can also confirm that the applicant has been in the kingdom for at least 10 years [seems like a duplication of 1 (3), but I think the point here is that 1.3 is an objective proof, and 2.2 shows that you have long-term personal relationships. It also used to be 2 character witnesses, now it's 3.]

 

Disclaimer: I am not an official translator, I take no responsibility if anything is translated wrong or leads to misunderstandings. I'm just doing my best here. Also, the choice of points that I consider important is my own subjective choice, with no guarantees that others might find other points equally or more important. I am not a lawyer. Sentences in brackets [] are my comments, 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
These are the changes that I consider important:
 
1 (1) Applicant has to submit a copy of the pink card
1 (2) Applicants have to submit a certificate [i don't understand this but think it is a medical certificate of sorts:] หนังสือรับรองความเป็นคนไร้รากเหง้า
1 (3) Applicant has to prove that they have been in the Kingdom not less than 10 years. [They are giving a list of examples how you can prove that.]
1 (4) Proof that the applicant appreciates the democratic monarchy, for example if they have contributed to society [i am not sure what that means]
2, 2.2 Three character witnesses who can also confirm that the applicant has been in the kingdom for at least 10 years [seems like a duplication of 1 (3), but I think the point here is that 1.3 is an objective proof, and 2.2 shows that you have long-term personal relationships. It also used to be 2 character witnesses, now it's 3.]
 
Disclaimer: I am not an official translator, I take no responsibility if anything is translated wrong or leads to misunderstandings. I'm just doing my best here. Also, the choice of points that I consider important is my own subjective choice, with no guarantees that others might find other points equally or more important. I am not a lawyer. Sentences in brackets [] are my comments, 
It seems to me that document is for stateless childs. Does not concern us.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, sas_cars said:

It seems to me that document is for stateless childs. Does not concern us.

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk
 

Where did you see that? What sentence did I miss?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Where did you see that? What sentence did I miss?
ไร้รากเหง้า is stateless. And the second requirement of 10 years residence is keep mentioning the childs. So I am assuming it's specific for stateless childs. (Like the famous cave ones)

Sent from my SM-G975F using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...