Pattaya: Pit Bull taken to temple to apologize after savaging owner to death

[Kerryd]

46 minutes ago, tomazbodner said:

I know of a restaurant in Vietnam that would happily take "Giant" in.

Won't have to go that far. Sakon Nakhon is well known for it's appetite for canine cuisine.

Anyone who thinks the dog "apologized" to the corpse is off their rocker. He was never punished for the mauling he did to his previous owner so in his mind, he didn't do anything wrong (and wouldn't have a clue what an "apology" is anyways).

And it's obvious that the new owner doesn't trust him all that much either as evidenced by the steel muzzle he's using on the dog.
 

[Aforek]

52 minutes ago, Kerryd said:

...
And it's obvious that the new owner doesn't trust him all that much either as evidenced by the steel muzzle he's using on the dog.
 

If so, why did he accept to adopt the dog ? to have it all the time muzzled ? really, I don't understand this guy ; why to have an animal if it's always to  keep it muzzled  ? 

it killed one time, why not other times ? nobody told it  it's not good, they even made a ceremony ...

[Johnny Mac]

I heard he got a 500bt fine.

[SiamRead]

3 hours ago, rodknock said:

did the owner accept the pit bull's apologie?

Yes....next...life????

[Thaifly88]

4 hours ago, Dmaxdan said:

So now the dog has apologized.

What's next? Community service? 

No, that’s it - all forgiven and the wife now looks after him - not even jail time required. I guess this is the way to go if you don’t like someone here 

[RichardColeman]

4 hours ago, webfact said:

He took part in a ceremony called "khor khama" in which he apologized to the corpse. 

Dog at temple apologizing to corpse ? Sorry, but this really does show how backwards Thailand is on occasion.

[car720]

Definitely beyond belief but what, for me, is always more beyond belief is the fact that people want to own these dogs and will defend them quite literally to the death, or so it seems.  Genocide is the only answer.

Edited April 22, 2021 by car720

[SiamRead]

1 hour ago, Aforek said:

If so, why did he accept to adopt the dog ? to have it all the time muzzled ? really, I don't understand this guy ; why to have an animal if it's always to  keep it muzzled  ? 

it killed one time, why not other times ? nobody told it  it's not good, they even made a ceremony ...

First, the new owner wants some fame.

Next, the new owner will be in the news again of an attack, let's hope this coming attack will not cause another life ???? 

[sitti]

I'm happy that the dog is given a second chance, instead of putting it down. Hopefully a new owner can control that dog better. 

 

And I don't get how people here can be this low talking trash about ceremony for deceased. It is for a victim, not the dog.

[anfh]

I notice new owner has him muzzled - clearly does not fully trust him !!

Lets wait and see what happens when they remove the muzzle —- TBC !

[Meat Pie 47]

5 hours ago, Dmaxdan said:

So now the dog has apologized.

What's next? Community service? 

No, transfer to an inactive kennel

[vandeventer]

This is sad for the dog, the dead owner must have teased the dog a little too much. But now the dog will fined it easier to kill his next owner. Sad to say he should be put down.

[PatOngo]

4 hours ago, EVENKEEL said:

After seeing that it's hard to take anything in Thailand seriously.

After seeing that??? Did you used to take something serious here?

[Aforek]

7 minutes ago, sitti said:

I'm happy that the dog is given a second chance, instead of putting it down. Hopefully a new owner can control that dog better. 

 

And I don't get how people here can be this low talking trash about ceremony for deceased. It is for a victim, not the dog.

Read the title ; 

"pitbull taken to the temple to apologize "

second chance ? the dog is  not even conscious it has killed somebody, don't think of it as an human being , it's a dog, it thinks like a dog 

[colinneil]

26 minutes ago, sitti said:

I'm happy that the dog is given a second chance, instead of putting it down. Hopefully a new owner can control that dog better. 

 

And I don't get how people here can be this low talking trash about ceremony for deceased. It is for a victim, not the dog.

You say you are happy the killer dog is given a second chance... Pathetic, the dogs a killer will never change.

You would not be so happy if it killed a member of your family.

[malibukid]

4 hours ago, Pilotman said:

This morning's laugh.  How can people be so gullible as to believe all this kind of quasi religious BS. 

because they are poor have little else

[iamariva1957]

Oh come on... shoot the dog! This dog has shown itself to be violent and has attacked which led to a death. Pits can be sweet family pets. But that is not what they were breed to be. Folks, that fact is something we just have to come to terms with. It is like a having a Tiger cub as a pet and then finding it so strange that when it grew up and was <deleted> off or scared it attacked and killed. In North America and in the EU a dog attack that leads to a death, would require the animal being put down humanly.

 

It is sorry state of events and I am sorry for their family's loss. 

[crickets]

Needs to be put down.

[Percy P]

5 hours ago, Aforek said:

Yes, so are  people who organised the ceremony : the only thing to was to euthanize this dog

I like dogs, but not dangerous dogs

Did the dog understood what was the ceremony organised for ? I doubt ...????

No doubt there was a money collection. For the dog.

[wombat]

There is no such thing as a bad dog, only bad owners.
The instrument of Karma takes many forms.

[iamariva1957]

43 minutes ago, sitti said:

I'm happy that the dog is given a second chance, instead of putting it down. Hopefully a new owner can control that dog better. 

 

And I don't get how people here can be this low talking trash about ceremony for deceased. It is for a victim, not the dog.

Really? For the victim? No way.... it was about the dog and how noble and caring and apologetic it was for the death it caused.  Second chance? You kill someone and see if you get one.... well... maybe after 20 years with good behavior they might let you out.

[brewsterbudgen]

12 minutes ago, crickets said:

Needs to be put down.

I'm astonished that it wasn't!

[bluesofa]

54 minutes ago, sitti said:

I'm happy that the dog is given a second chance, instead of putting it down. Hopefully a new owner can control that dog better. 

 

And I don't get how people here can be this low talking trash about ceremony for deceased. It is for a victim, not the dog.

'Hopefully a new owner can control that dog better'

 

And if not they can always have another funeral.

Perhaps the dog was originally trained by an undertaker.

Edited April 22, 2021 by bluesofa

[simonr]

5 hours ago, tonray said:

Perhaps while he's at the temple he can buy a lottery ticket...

They were all counting the number of times his tail wagged....

[iamariva1957]

1 minute ago, wombat said:

There is no such thing as a bad dog, only bad owners.
The instrument of Karma takes many forms.

There is an argument there. But throwing it back to "Karma" is a paying no attention to the fact that that breed of dog was bred for a specific purpose... good owner or bad... the genetic makeup of the animal was set irregardless of the owner's 

[jacko45k]

I suspect he would behave better if they removed the two large items resting on the carpet behind 'Giant'! Don't see those on the killer Yorkies!

[saminoz]

5 hours ago, smedly said:

no need for a muzzle now, the beast has made merit and has become a loving family pet

 

saying nothing else as it would be deleted

It's hard to decide which is the most stupid; the new owner, the dog or the rug!

[smew]

This is Thailand in the 21 century  

[Janner1]

34 minutes ago, vandeventer said:

This is sad for the dog, the dead owner must have teased the dog a little too much. But now the dog will fined it easier to kill his next owner. Sad to say he should be put down.

This dog breed does not need to be teased, viciousness is inherent in them and they are bred specifically for it, that is why many responsible countries have banned them.

one can only hope that the new owner does NOT have young children nearby but I fear that we have not heard the last of this killer dog

[Percy P]

4 hours ago, Pilotman said:

This morning's laugh.  How can people be so gullible as to believe all this kind of quasi religious BS. 

It's not a religious thing ,it's a mental problem.