Gohonzon Posted August 5, 2004 Share Posted August 5, 2004 About three years ago I had a road accident in Cambodia resulting in having to have my leg amputated.I was at that time considering entering a Wat with the possibility of ordination.From hospital in Cambodia I wrote to Phra Peter Pannapadipo (Phra Farang) asking whether being an amputee would in anyway disadvantage me in taking the yellow robe.It was quite hurtful to be informed that having a limb missing discluded me from the possibilityof ordination.Being informed that one must be whole in body (and mind) to become a monk in Thailand.I can find nothing in the Sutras to validify this,but only this-as Phra Peter informs me-it was layed down by the 1st Patriach.I have shared this experience with many other Buddhist (including a monk in Burma/Myamar) and all dispute-usually in horror-this apparent lack of compassion.Although I have now returned to another (Mahayana) practice,I still ponder as to why my disability should be discriminated against (?) in Thai Theravada Buddhism.Anyone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paleface Posted August 5, 2004 Share Posted August 5, 2004 Phra Peter really knows his stuff and goes by the book. There is an old monk that lives near me with one leg. I dont know his story so, maybe he lost it after his ordination. I do know that some temples are more lenient with ordination and Im sure you could find a temple in whitch to ordain. Good luck, Paleface Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gohonzon Posted August 5, 2004 Author Share Posted August 5, 2004 Thanks Paleface. As you say ,the disabled monk that you mention was probably ordained beforehand.It's not so much an issue to me as it was previously,and I'm now commited to another practice.However,I would still be interested if anyone could justify this quite bewildering form of discrimination in this modern age.That is,when the practicalities of being disabled are less severe than in times gone by.Best wishes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
camerata Posted August 6, 2004 Share Posted August 6, 2004 However,I would still be interested if anyone could justify this quite bewildering form of discrimination in this modern age.That is,when the practicalities of being disabled are less severe than in times gone by.Best wishes. Since it seems to be a literal interpretation of some old text, I wonder where they draw the line? A missing finger? Tooth removed? Tooth crowned? Circumcised...? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gohonzon Posted August 6, 2004 Author Share Posted August 6, 2004 Interestingly enough I saw a programme on the Beeb where a Thai man had,had his penis severed and tied to a helium balloon,and let go, by his wife.It was never found again.True story.The outcome of all this is that he ordained as a monk-presumably without the missing part. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drummer Posted August 18, 2004 Share Posted August 18, 2004 Interestingly enough I saw a programme on the Beeb where a Thai man had,had his penis severed and tied to a helium balloon,and let go, by his wife.It was never found again.True story.The outcome of all this is that he ordained as a monk-presumably without the missing part. ----> insert silly joke about him not being him no longer being whole in mind. <---- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now