Dickie Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 My assistant just brings up the forum page Teething problems, m'thinks. No chance someone actually tests changes before implementing them on the production system? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mandl Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 Nice work George. Are you planning to upgrade the Bear Pit as well? (we could really use that ignore member feature) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george Posted October 26, 2004 Author Share Posted October 26, 2004 My assistant just brings up the forum page Teething problems, m'thinks. No way! Cool programmers do it live. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highwayman Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 Are u experiencing problems with the flood control? err, with only 150 posts? No, just the first time l can remember getting that message on this forum. Most forums l've posted on only apply flood control to new posters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george Posted October 26, 2004 Author Share Posted October 26, 2004 Are u experiencing problems with the flood control? err, with only 150 posts? No, just the first time l can remember getting that message on this forum. Most forums l've posted on only apply flood control to new posters. Just checked, and we are using the default for flood control, nothing has changed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huski Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 test1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
francois Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 hi' great job, looks nice and a lot faster too everything works with netscape so far cheers francois Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huski Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 test1 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> test2 no flood control on posting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huski Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 test1 <{POST_SNAPBACK}> test2 no flood control on posting <{POST_SNAPBACK}> only 20 second flood control on searches Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
britmaveric Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 George- not sure if possible, but is their anyway you can save your userid/password when you use WAP version of TV? It's a tad annoying having to enter the userid/pass each time I check TV on my mobile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george Posted October 26, 2004 Author Share Posted October 26, 2004 George- not sure if possible, but is their anyway you can save your userid/password when you use WAP version of TV? It's a tad annoying having to enter the userid/pass each time I check TV on my mobile. It depends on your mobile. The forum supports mobile cookies, so if your mobile supports them, it should work. Please open a new thread in the Internet forum branch and we will help you out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darknight Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 Congratulations on the New interface George. I feel like moving in to a new home Lot faster to Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
britmaveric Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 Ta George for pointing me in the right direction! All sorted now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDN Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 I've been using it for 5 hours now, and I must say it's very, very fast on my 42.6 Kbps land line. Well done! But I do have a problem with "smilies". The "Clickable Smilies" don't work (Firefox 1.0PR) but the "Show All" smilies do. . I'll re-install my Firefox extensions and see if that sorts it out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stroll Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 Nice work George. Are you planning to upgrade the Bear Pit as well? (we could really use that ignore member feature) <{POST_SNAPBACK}> The ignore member feature doesn't seem to work for me, it accepts none of the red-colour usernames. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDN Posted October 26, 2004 Share Posted October 26, 2004 Can we have more emoticons per post again, please? (Currently set to 10) Thanks George! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kandt Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 Just been off-line for a few days and we have a new Forum. Seems nice and simple to use once you learn the new buttons. Well done. Cheers……..kandt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mbkudu Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 It seems visually pleasing . Change is good I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dickie Posted October 27, 2004 Share Posted October 27, 2004 My assistant still brings up the main forum page in the popup window. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mandl Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Perhaps a minor glitch in the program? When I view Online Users by Member Name there are quite a few blanks where the user name should be. Something need looking into? Am using Mozilla browser. Didn't have a problem before the new software. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jayenram Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Chat room works but I don't see the section that lists who is using it. Still forthcoming? <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Still doesn't w*rk for me m*ndl with dial up connection. I did try to log on a couple of days ago on the pub's broadband connection and had no problem whatsover (except having to pay Bht 1.50 per minute for the priviledge). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axel Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Thanks George, looks nice and seems to be faster as before. I am still fiddling with the new 'quote'-feature, guess I will be coming there. One thing personally disturbs me, the date. 'Today' and 'yesterday'. When I read a post I might remeber 27th, now I remember 'yesterday'? 'My Assistant' used to have a 'Todays active posts' which disappeared? This was quite helpful after 'View new posts' to go back to the one or other. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDN Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 ...One thing personally disturbs me, the date. 'Today' and 'yesterday'. When I read a post I might remember 27th, now I remember 'yesterday'?......<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hmm, I prefer to see the date too. Perhaps best - if possible - would be "Today" or "Yesterday" followed by the actual date. There's plenty of room for it on the line. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
george Posted October 28, 2004 Author Share Posted October 28, 2004 ...One thing personally disturbs me, the date. 'Today' and 'yesterday'. When I read a post I might remember 27th, now I remember 'yesterday'?...... Hmm, I prefer to see the date too. Perhaps best - if possible - would be "Today" or "Yesterday" followed by the actual date. There's plenty of room for it on the line. Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDN Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 ...One thing personally disturbs me, the date. 'Today' and 'yesterday'. When I read a post I might remember 27th, now I remember 'yesterday'?......<{POST_SNAPBACK}> Hmm, I prefer to see the date too. Perhaps best - if possible - would be "Today" or "Yesterday" followed by the actual date. There's plenty of room for it on the line. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Fixed. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Woo-hooo! Such service! Thanks George. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fatter than harry Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Roger, That actually looks like you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mandl Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Which one? The tall one or the short one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDN Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 Roger, That actually looks like you! <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Jeez, you're right! OK, I'll stop shaving my head. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDN Posted October 28, 2004 Share Posted October 28, 2004 re. Smilies not working with Firefox 1.0PR On my PC, the smilies in the "Clickable Smilies" group work with IE. They don't with Firefox 1.0PR - they did before the Forum Upgrade. The Smilies in the window that pops up after you click "Show All", do work - both IE and Firefox. I poked around Firefox and got to "Tools / Javascript Console" and opened it. Every time I click on a Smilie in the "Clickable Smilies" group, the Javascript console shows one more message. Each is like this: Error: ua_vers is not definedSource File: http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/jscripts/ipb_bbcode.js Line: 352 And if I click on the link, I get this: //-------------------------------------------- // GENERAL INSERT FUNCTION //-------------------------------------------- // ibTag: opening tag // ibClsTag: closing tag, used if we have selected text // isSingle: true if we do not close the tag right now // return value: true if the tag needs to be closed later // function doInsert(ibTag, ibClsTag, isSingle) { var isClose = false; var obj_ta = fombj.Post; //---------------------------------------- // It's IE! //---------------------------------------- if ( (ua_vers >= 4) && is_ie && is_win) { if (obj_ta.isTextEdit) { obj_ta.focus(); var sel = document.selection; var rng = sel.createRange(); rng.colapse; if((sel.type == "Text" || sel.type == "None") && rng != null) { if(ibClsTag != "" && rng.text.length > 0) ibTag += rng.text + ibClsTag; else if(isSingle) isClose = true; rng.text = ibTag; } } else { if(isSingle) { isClose = true; } obj_ta.value += ibTag; } } //---------------------------------------- // It's MOZZY! //---------------------------------------- else if ( obj_ta.selectionEnd ) { var ss = obj_ta.selectionStart; var st = obj_ta.scrollTop; var es = obj_ta.selectionEnd; if (es <= 2) { es = obj_ta.textLength; } var start = (obj_ta.value).substring(0, ss); var middle = (obj_ta.value).substring(ss, es); var end = (obj_ta.value).substring(es, obj_ta.textLength); //----------------------------------- // text range? //----------------------------------- if (obj_ta.selectionEnd - obj_ta.selectionStart > 0) { middle = ibTag + middle + ibClsTag; } else { middle = ibTag + middle; if (isSingle) { isClose = true; } } obj_ta.value = start + middle + end; var cpos = ss + (middle.length); obj_ta.selectionStart = cpos; obj_ta.selectionEnd = cpos; obj_ta.scrollTop = st; } //---------------------------------------- // It's CRAPPY! //---------------------------------------- else { if (isSingle) { isClose = true; } obj_ta.value += ibTag; } obj_ta.focus(); return isClose; } So, is it me or is it you? Anyone else have this problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Axel Posted October 29, 2004 Share Posted October 29, 2004 Fixed. <{POST_SNAPBACK}> Thanks George Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now