Jump to content
BANGKOK
Sign in to follow this  
MSingh

The Kuyt Goal Against Sunderland

Pick one  

23 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

So come on then, Club alleigences aside, what was that all about ??

Little Poll to boot...;)

Edited by MSingh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a point for 'unsportsmanlike behaviour' because it was quite clear what Turner's intention was - but I voted for 'fair goal' because technically it was.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a point for 'unsportsmanlike behaviour' because it was quite clear what Turner's intention was - but I voted for 'fair goal' because technically it was.

Ditto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a point for 'unsportsmanlike behaviour' because it was quite clear what Turner's intention was - but I voted for 'fair goal' because technically it was.

Ditto.

+ 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

can't be offside m. impossible.

No, why not Mate ??

Kuyt i'm talking about, not Torres..

Honestly, i thought as in why it couldn't be Offside before adding it to the Poll but unless i'm having a blonde moment, the ball was played forward to Kuyt & he was beyond the second to last Defende, but not the GK, & the ball...................

300px-Offsidelarge.svg.png

The blue forward on the left of the diagram is in an offside position as he is in front of both the second-to-last defender (marked by the dotted line) and the ball. Note that this does not necessarily mean he is committing an offside offence; it only becomes an offence if the ball were to be played to him at this moment, whether or not he is in an offside position when he receives the ball, as he could receive the ball in an onside position but he'd still have committed an offside offence.

Edited by MSingh

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

unless i'm losing my marbles too kuyt can't be offside because he's behind torres. to be offside you have to by default be the furthest forward attacker. that torres passed the ball forward doesn't matter because kuyt ran on from behind torres. it doesn't matter about the second to last defender as - effectively - torres himself is playing kuyt onside.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

unless i'm losing my marbles too kuyt can't be offside because he's behind torres. to be offside you have to by default be the furthest forward attacker. that torres passed the ball forward doesn't matter because kuyt ran on from behind torres. it doesn't matter about the second to last defender as - effectively - torres himself is playing kuyt onside.

Oooohhh i don't know about that Mate, we need one of them " Ask Clattenburg " ( or maybe not him but you know what i mean ;) ) gadgets or something like it anyway..:D

I was unde rthe impresson it was all abotu teh second from last Defender Mate, it can't be his own Player playing him on, surely ??

Will have a look at this after work Mate, i'd be amazed it it is what you & if it is, i'd find it utter madness of a rule..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

unless i'm losing my marbles too kuyt can't be offside because he's behind torres. to be offside you have to by default be the furthest forward attacker. that torres passed the ball forward doesn't matter because kuyt ran on from behind torres. it doesn't matter about the second to last defender as - effectively - torres himself is playing kuyt onside.

Oooohhh i don't know about that Mate, we need one of them " Ask Clattenburg " ( or maybe not him but you know what i mean ;) ) gadgets or something like it anyway..:D

I was unde rthe impresson it was all abotu teh second from last Defender Mate, it can't be his own Player playing him on, surely ??

Will have a look at this after work Mate, i'd be amazed it it is what you & if it is, i'd find it utter madness of a rule..

I am 100% sure that if a player is behind a collegue when he plays the ball then he cannot be offside.

Edited by alfieconn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

School yard defending by the sunderland player and torres had the right to go for the ball as the player played the ball back with his feet,but i voted unsportsmanlike by liverpool just because liverpool player did it.

I was more concerned with stevie me getting away with a sly dig on another player again should have been a red.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

School yard defending by the sunderland player and torres had the right to go for the ball as the player played the ball back with his feet,but i voted unsportsmanlike by liverpool just because liverpool player did it.

I was more concerned with stevie me getting away with a sly dig on another player again should have been a red.

Agreed, there must be some FA directive that Stevie G is allowed to be treated differently. As for the goal, yeah it was techincally legal, but still feel that it was unsportsmanlike . Seems that that clown Atwell continues to be involved in controversial decisions.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Liverpool deserve all the breaks they can get at the moment.......allthough if it was against them i think it wouldn't of been allowed :whistling:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Revenge for the beach ball goal last season. :huh:

But it was a Liverpool fans beachball.

Ive just seen this goal and i think when he backhealed he meant it to go all the way to his keeper, just he fcuked up.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...