Jump to content
BANGKOK
Sign in to follow this  
webfact

Law Prohibiting Marriage To Foreigners Over The Age Of 50 Proposed To Thai Cabinet

Recommended Posts

So if you only have 400,000 in the bank, you are a burden on Thailand :lol:

Looks like i am a BIG burden.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So does that mean that a foreigner over 50 cannot marry any Thai national regardless of age?

e.g Foreigner 51 and Thai woman 45 cannot get married?

That would seem ridiculous!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if you only have 400,000 in the bank, you are a burden on Thailand :lol:

Looks like i am a BIG burden.

Also with the Farang prices rip off we are a burden :lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This is absolutely true. I was talking with my neighbor who says that this is the only legislation the Democrats and Pheu Thai can currently agree on. It has nearly 100% bipartisan support. They are actually hoping that it will be the foundation of a new platform of reconciliation in Thai politics.

There is even talk of the red shirts and the yellow shirts walking arm in arm around the city of Bangkok to personally announce the new restriction.

There is a limit to how far you can push something...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I am concerned that these people are attempting to circumvent the rules by marrying innocent Thai women.

Seems some people really do have their heads in the clouds.

:D

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
"Many older foreigners seem to marry Thai women so they can stay in Thailand under less strict requirements. Instead of needing to meet the requirements of 800,000 baht in the bank they only have to show 400,000 baht a year when married to a Thai. Additionally, many of these people seem to come to Thailand simply to marry much younger girls. In many cases they are old enough to be their father. I am concerned that these people are attempting to circumvent the rules by marrying innocent Thai women. If these people don't have enough money to retire then they shouldn't be here and become a burden to Thailand," Tawatchai Suksoom of the Ministry of Interior stated.

This is just wrong on so many levels.

Don't they know that getting married will cost a lot more than 400,000 baht. So reducing the financial requirement would hardly be valid reason to get married. :(

Don' they also know that in many cases they are old enough to be their grand father. :lol:

But the main reason it's wrong - "Innocent Thai Women" :huh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So does that mean that a foreigner over 50 cannot marry any Thai national regardless of age?

e.g Foreigner 51 and Thai woman 45 cannot get married?

That would seem ridiculous!

Yes it is ridiculous and doesn't this law also go against basic human rights?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, it has gotta be an April Fool's stunt. Cambodia was just talking about an absurd and sexist law like this.

The Cambodian law only applies to foreign men over the age of 50. So a foreign woman can marry a Cambodian of any age.

That is sexist. It is also racist. Not to mention absurdist, looney, utterly mental, brain crippling, economically ridiculous, etc.

It IS a joke but it DID hook me in for a moment there. Big thanks for previous poster posting a warning, I myself had quite forgotten the date

Besides I am preoccupied with the floods down south, I am in Aussie just now but I have a house and woman down on Samui but she tells me she's coping OK.

Good luck and good day to everybody over there in LOS.

Edited by southbot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

More stupid insanity from the Thai Government. Amazing.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Very amusing, for the Thai government (yes, he is a minster, so a representitive of the government) referring to foreigners with less than 400,000 baht as a "burden" on Thai society. Tell me the ratio of Thais vs. Farang over the age of 50 with less than 400,000 in the bank?

This, if passed will be a huge economic blow for Thailand - a large percentage of Farang business owners in Thailand are 45+, and many buy those businesses and run it with their partner. Many own land with their partners. Most of these girls are not rich when they meet the "old burden" Farang. Infact, sadly most of these girls meet their Farang in the go go bars. Who was it that was the burden again?

I have never said this before, but this move really does look discriminatory against non-Thai nationals, and will be a huge blow both to the future development, educational and economic growth to Thailand if passed. Maybe Thailands politicians needs to learn when passing law, that you have the power to make the decisions but with that power you must execute vision, or your power is worthless and often destructive rather than constructive.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

you know they may be doing so of these guys a huge favor.You dont have to get married . i think it is great ! Really stupid law it is telling when you have to copie Cambodia a so called lower country . But for the young girls there goes the easy life . It is a good way to keep poor young girls in their place at the bottom . sometimes i think Thai women just deseverse Thai guys (even know thai girls ask me to set them up with my american friends everyday)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes. Thailand should bring in this law to prohibit older Farangs and other foreigners from marrying very young women .

I have seen some farangs with young wives who could be their grand daughters!.

Laos and Cambodia have enacted these law: why not Thailand.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I live here, and am married to a woman close to my own age. Having said that, I know plenty of older guys married to women a lot younger than they and in some cases it seems to work ok,

While it may not a shining example of a meeting of minds or mutual attraction, it works in a mutually supportive kind of way.

What I don't understand is the older guy (60 plus in a lot of cases) having children. They make various arguments as to why it is not a bad thing, however, at the end of the day you are going to have a child

that is going to be left fatherless at a relatively young age, and that is not fair on the child.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...