stevenl Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 This whole case stinks. There is no doubt at all he killed her, he has already admitted to that on several occasions. The only discussion point is that the prosecution claims it is murder and he claims it was an accident. He has NOT claimed he ''killed'' her. Yes, he has. But he says it was an accident, prosecution has other ideas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dighambara Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Don't believe they ever executed a westerner in Thailand, or am I wrong? Don't read history much...LOL Siam executed may foreigners in the days of Ayuttaya. Constantine Falkon immediately comes to mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atyclb Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Unlikely he would be sentenced to death. The Norwegian government would protest strongly. It would be a very good wake up call for Norway if he was executed. This guy did not kill his wife because he is from Norway, any nationality could have done this... So don't say it would be a wake up call for Norway - it would be a wake up call for murderers. Dare you inject non-delusional thinking on TV forums LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SouthernMan3 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Don't believe they ever executed a westerner in Thailand, or am I wrong? Actually they did.. a compatriot.. http://en.wikipedia....antine_Phaulkon :> If I read correctly that was in 1688. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
atyclb Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Stories like this become the Farang version of Lakorn TV (sensational thai soap opera) and perhaps "spicen up" the mundane whoring drudgery. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potosi Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 There is often a pile of empy caustic soda bags in front of the estate of a carpenter in the area where I live. I wonder what he needs the stuff for in such large quantities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rosco911 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Don't believe they ever executed a westerner in Thailand, or am I wrong? Does anyone know the last time they executed anyone ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Felt 35 Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Don't believe they ever executed a westerner in Thailand, or am I wrong? Does anyone know the last time they executed anyone ? August 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Valentine Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 What he did was a terrible act however his treatment should be no harsher than what would be served if he had of been a Thai national, which I doubt would be more than 3 years as for the weapon charges as his wife was Thai I do not see a problem as my understanding is that Thais are allowed guns !!!! I think anyone can buy a gun here if you have the proper paperwork. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timewilltell Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Don't believe they ever executed a westerner in Thailand, or am I wrong? I think it is pretty much a weekly occurrence but not though official channels. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiNiro Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Did his relationship with the maid go sour recently? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALFREDO Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 Why would you put her body in your own dumpster....just saying, tht is not the smartest way to hide something like this. Any suggestions? The Container, some iron, welded shut, a night, a boat, a deep spot in the sea, a splash. 2 splash`s 1 for the witness... For the disposal no help, witness,,needed, I think to remember that big Containers for trash or other "things", have wheels. So runs to the car, a short move and on it, from the car, down, runs to the boat. (Some people will even use such Containers to bring different thing in need to the boats) A move on the boat and can be done. Witness,needed? Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ALFREDO Posted February 13, 2013 Share Posted February 13, 2013 There is often a pile of empy caustic soda bags in front of the estate of a carpenter in the area where I live. I wonder what he needs the stuff for in such large quantities. Just ask him, tell him its about a bet, in which, you think, he uses it in that way described here downstairs, -to get rid of a body and your buddy, thinks different. Better ask him not inside his house! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium_hydroxide Sodium hydroxide is used to digest tissues, such as in a process that was used with farm animals at one time. This process involved placing a carcass into a sealed chamber, then adding a mixture of sodium hydroxide and water (which breaks the chemical bonds that keep the flesh intact). This eventually turns the body into a coffee-like liquid, and the only solid that remains are bone hulls, which could be crushed between one's fingertips. Sodium hydroxide is frequently used in the process of decomposing roadkill dumped in landfills by animal disposal contractors. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 The gun was owned by the deceased, but, was in the possession of the accused. He is being charged for this. Seems like Transam doesn't know the facts. The gun was in the downstairs loo, NOT on his person, her mobile was there too. Do not accuse unless YOU have the facts. As the deceased had not lived with him for a couple of years, the gun was in HIS possession. You don't actually have to carry a gun to possess it. He also bragged here on TV about having it. Get your facts straight first, mate. The house belonged to her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 (edited) I think he can afford to pay himself out , if he sell all his properties in Phuket. I was hoping he could rot in a Thai jail for a few years , we dont want him back to Norway. You really need to read the whole of this thread. The properties are not in his name. They were in the victim's name which the children will now inherit. This fact explains the motive behind hiding the body. I believe Dokset comes from a rich family anyway. Wonder where Dokset's fan-club of one has gone. Naughty but expected from you. . Edited February 14, 2013 by LivinginKata Name removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KarenBravo Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Jeez........yes, we know the house (and others) belonged to her. She hadn't lived with him, or, in that house for two years. The gun belonged to her, but, it was in his possession illegally, which is why the police are charging him with this fact. You need to keep up. Tired of stating obvious known facts to you. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Jeez........yes, we know the house (and others) belonged to her. She hadn't lived with him, or, in that house for two years. The gun belonged to her, but, it was in his possession illegally, which is why the police are charging him with this fact. You need to keep up. Tired of stating obvious known facts to you. Can't believe what you are saying. The house belongs to her, she had belongings there also, one of which was HER gun. So what should he have done with it, as it was not his property, regarding HER gun ? Sold it, nooooooo, took it to the police who would tell him YOUR carrying a gun . Wise one, tell us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LivinginKata Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Jeez........yes, we know the house (and others) belonged to her. She hadn't lived with him, or, in that house for two years. The gun belonged to her, but, it was in his possession illegally, which is why the police are charging him with this fact. You need to keep up. Tired of stating obvious known facts to you. Can't believe what you are saying. The house belongs to her, she had belongings there also, one of which was HER gun. So what should he have done with it, as it was not his property, regarding HER gun ? Sold it, nooooooo, took it to the police who would tell him YOUR carrying a gun . Wise one, tell us. For sure he should not have fired it at a Swedish man who intruded his home (alleged, to try and collect a debt). Read the news report about a separate extortion case for 800,000 baht against this man Stein, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcharacters Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 no way there was a smell or any odor after 12 months.. utter garbage Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted February 14, 2013 Share Posted February 14, 2013 Jeez........yes, we know the house (and others) belonged to her. She hadn't lived with him, or, in that house for two years. The gun belonged to her, but, it was in his possession illegally, which is why the police are charging him with this fact. You need to keep up. Tired of stating obvious known facts to you. Can't believe what you are saying. The house belongs to her, she had belongings there also, one of which was HER gun. So what should he have done with it, as it was not his property, regarding HER gun ? Sold it, nooooooo, took it to the police who would tell him YOUR carrying a gun . Wise one, tell us. For sure he should not have fired it at a Swedish man who intruded his home (alleged, to try and collect a debt). Read the news report about a separate extortion case for 800,000 baht against this man Stein, Did he use the gun to kill the lady ? If no, why not if he was going to ''kill'' her ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevenl Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 Jeez........yes, we know the house (and others) belonged to her. She hadn't lived with him, or, in that house for two years. The gun belonged to her, but, it was in his possession illegally, which is why the police are charging him with this fact. You need to keep up. Tired of stating obvious known facts to you. Can't believe what you are saying. The house belongs to her, she had belongings there also, one of which was HER gun. So what should he have done with it, as it was not his property, regarding HER gun ? Sold it, nooooooo, took it to the police who would tell him YOUR carrying a gun . Wise one, tell us. For sure he should not have fired it at a Swedish man who intruded his home (alleged, to try and collect a debt). Read the news report about a separate extortion case for 800,000 baht against this man Stein, Did he use the gun to kill the lady ?If no, why not if he was going to ''kill'' her ? Because he wanted it to look like an accident? But yes, it could have been an accident, but he still killed her, by accident or on purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 To look like an accident eh . So why wasn't she left where she landed and the BiB called to show an accident ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jbrain Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 To look like an accident eh . So why wasn't she left where she landed and the BiB called to show an accident ? Maybe because it clearly wasn't an accident ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 To look like an accident eh . So why wasn't she left where she landed and the BiB called to show an accident ? Maybe because it clearly wasn't an accident ? Could be, the bin might not of been his, a new acquisition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taninthai Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 To look like an accident eh . So why wasn't she left where she landed and the BiB called to show an accident ? Because then he would have lost all his properties and any rental income hecwas recieving come on keep up not difficult is it. Greed is the root of alk evil. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 To look like an accident eh . So why wasn't she left where she landed and the BiB called to show an accident ? Because then he would have lost all his properties and any rental income hecwas recieving come on keep up not difficult is it. Greed is the root of alk evil. Unfortunately you and others will not look at other possibilities. I try to put myself in who ever it is position and see what comes out the other end.He had plenty of time to think about a dastardly deed, all he needed was for her to disappear. Some here say he was a tough guy, if he was l cannot imagine keeping a corpse at ONE of their places instead of a road trip somewhere with a shovel. It seems that the whole torso was not in the bin, why not, was there soil in the bin with the remains. Did the BiB do one of those scans that can detected unseen blood where she is meant to have sercomed to her injuries, loads of questions for me. But if many of you want to hang him without doing all the tech stuff, that is your problem. Someone above said he went after folk with the gun (business), that has nooooo relevance at all regarding the ladies demise, if she was shot then perhaps it would. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taninthai Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 ^ you are making the mistake of thinking he is a normal guy ,someone that has done what he has done is not normal he is either pure evil or has mental problems. In my book even if he did kill her accidently which he has admitted to ,he still deserves a long sentence for chopping her up and hiding the body. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transam Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 You could be right but for me there are many question marks. Yes, he could have done the deed but. Why didn't the ladies ''Thai Cop'' husband not report her missing and have this guys residences searched and him questioned, why wasn't all her torso in the bin and not disposed of gradually, as some parts were missing was the bin with some remains planted. Why keep a corpse where many servants frequent ? As for admitting she died via an accident, l am sure he would have been advised he was in no win situation, and noooooo CSI here. Just my thoughts and one of the reasons capital punishment has disappeared in many countries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a99az Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 He had managed to hide the body for over two years until the maid noticed strange smells around the house and the police raided the villa. Do the journalists actually believe the stuff they are fed, or do they just have no choice but to report it the way the police tell them? haha If this was a week after she was killed, ok... but two years and she is just now starting to smell things? Riiiiiiiight. The maid must've wanted more blackmail money, or the police, or both? She would not have smelt much if she had been frozen for months before being dumped in the skip Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FritsSikkink Posted February 16, 2013 Share Posted February 16, 2013 Jeez........yes, we know the house (and others) belonged to her. She hadn't lived with him, or, in that house for two years. The gun belonged to her, but, it was in his possession illegally, which is why the police are charging him with this fact. You need to keep up. Tired of stating obvious known facts to you. Can't believe what you are saying. The house belongs to her, she had belongings there also, one of which was HER gun. So what should he have done with it, as it was not his property, regarding HER gun ? Sold it, nooooooo, took it to the police who would tell him YOUR carrying a gun . Wise one, tell us. Call the police to pick up the gun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now