webfact Posted February 28, 2013 Share Posted February 28, 2013 EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW'Don't give all power to one family'Tanatpong KongsaiThe NationOng-artDemocrat election director hopes Bangkok voters come out in full forceBANGKOK: -- Ong-art Klampaiboon, the Democrat Party election director, said he hoped Bangkokians would come out in full force to vote for Sukhumbhand Paribatra and relay the message that they do not want the entire country to be controlled by just one family."This election has special significance because it will decide whether Bangkokians are willing to give all the power to Pheu Thai, a certain group of people or a single family," Ong-art said."If the Democrat candidate wins, then it will be a message to those in power that most Bangkokians do not want to see the entire country being monopolised by one family or a certain group of people, but that they want to see a decentralisation of power. However, we are ready to accept the outcome."Ong-art said he hoped to see a high voter turnout because statistics show that Democrats usually win when the turnout is high.He admitted that it was tougher for an incumbent candidate to retain his seat in comparison to new faces. He explained that a new face would always have an advantage because people will have already seen the incumbent's performance, while people would want to test a newcomer.Anyway, he said, the Democrat Party had mobilised its MPs and high-profile members to beg for support so the incumbent Sukhumbhand can complete his unfinished projects. Ong-art added that he expected it to be tight race.Ong-art went on to say that "seamless cooperation with the national government" campaign motto of the Pheu Thai candidate was just a tactic."If cooperation was really seamless, then the Bangkok governor should not be elected but appointed by the government, like provincial governors are, so the powers that be can order them to do anything. However, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Act requires Bangkok residents to elect their own governor, so this so-called seamless cooperation will never be real," Ong-art said."If the governor comes from the coalition leader, will he have to be replaced in two years if the leader of the coalition changes after general elections?" Ong-art asked.He went on to say that the previous Bangkok governors, who were from the Democrat Party, had no problems working with the state government over the past eight years, citing governments led by Thaksin Shinawatra, Surayud Chulanont, Samak Sundaravej and Somchai Wongsawat.He added that Sukhumbhand only had problems with the Pheu Thai-led government over the past six months or so. He went on to say that he believed Pheu Thai MPs wanted to discredit Sukhumbhand ahead of the voting."The public learned about this much later and now the number of Democrat supporters has increased," Ong-art said."Earlier, we were able to work well with the government. It always supported us but problems arose after the flooding. I'm not sure whether or not these conflicts were planned to try and influence people's votes."Ong-art said the Pheu Thai candidate had promised several mass-transport systems, but these systems can only be implemented by the national government so it does not matter which party the governor comes from.He said the party has created a new set of pink stickers to put on Sukhubhand's campaign posters to try and win more support. The stickers carry messages like: "I work hard for Bangkokians", "I'm honest, not a cheat", "This Democrat stays put for Bangkokians" and "Joining forces against monopoly".He said Democrat leader Abhisit Vejjajiva, Sukhumbhand and other leading Democrats will gather at 6.30am to campaign at Wong Wien Yai today and hold a press conference at the Talad Plu BTS station at 3pm. The candidate's last major campaign will be held at Benjasiri Park near the Emporium shopping mall at 4pm.-- The Nation 2013-03-01 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post selftaopath Posted February 28, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted February 28, 2013 I recently heard: Thailand is the name of the Shinawatra family business. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ricardo Posted March 1, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2013 One can only trust that it won't be sold off to Temasek/Singapore, this time round. But then again, it might work out better for the country that way, in the long-term ? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pedro01 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Vote Democrat - "We are not Peu Thai" Good luck with that strategy... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bigbamboo Posted March 1, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2013 I recently heard: Thailand is the name of the Shinawatra family business. The warning signs were there when Mr T used to call himself Thailand's CEO. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ricardo Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 I recently heard: Thailand is the name of the Shinawatra family business. The warning signs were there when Mr T used to call himself Thailand's CEO. and announced that TRT would be in-power for 20+ years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tatsujin Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Don't give all power to one family ... Too late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREM-R Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Don't give all power to one family ... Too late. Instead lets continue with all the power in the hands of a few families known collectively as the Amart 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infernalman7 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 So vote Democrats. Problem solved? Perhaps the Democrats need to learn to be smart. And may be they will be smarter if they lose this election. But it doesn't matter anyway. The military will do something. It's just part of the Thai-style Democracy isn't it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metisdead Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 A post with reference to HM the King has been removed. Speculation, comments and discussion of either a political or personal nature are not allowed when discussing HM The King or the Royal family. There is to be absolutely No Discussion Of The Monarchy In Political Context. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pimay1 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Don't give all power to one family ... Too late. Instead lets continue with all the power in the hands of a few families known collectively as the Amart Did you enjoy your time at Ratchaprasong? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PREM-R Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Don't give all power to one family ... Too late. Instead lets continue with all the power in the hands of a few families known collectively as the Amart Did you enjoy your time at Ratchaprasong? Eyang Wa! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Ferangled Posted March 1, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2013 What hypocritical tripe coming from those that represent the wealthy families that have held a monopoly grip on Thailand for centuries... more tit for tat BS. How about a truly novel idea, a political party that represents none of the wealthy families and relies simply on people voting for them and not shady sponsors or behind the scenes power brokers? Sorry, stupid suggestion, clearly that would never work in a real democracy... let alone Thailand. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Will2011 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 reading the headline, i thought this guys had balls, but when i was the article, i found that he was just like other, a sheep... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim walker Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Never believe anyone in politics, its part of theirtraining and upbringing to tell un-truths or in other words lies and in my 30years of business I have learnt to never trust a liar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ratcatcher Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 I recently heard: Thailand is the name of the Shinawatra family business. THAKSINLAND ENTERTAINMENT CORP.INC. The of S.E.Asia Not hard to imagine really. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geriatrickid Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 The Democrats could start with Phuket. Aren't most of the major landholdings controlled by a handful of families, all closely aligned with the Democrats? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimi007 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 What hypocritical tripe coming from those that represent the wealthy families that have held a monopoly grip on Thailand for centuries... more tit for tat BS. How about a truly novel idea, a political party that represents none of the wealthy families and relies simply on people voting for them and not shady sponsors or behind the scenes power brokers? Sorry, stupid suggestion, clearly that would never work in a real democracy... let alone Thailand. I agree! And how about the Thai people being able to vote where they live instead of having to return to their home province to vote? Or doing away with vote buying? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginjag Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 (edited) The Democrats could start with Phuket. Aren't most of the major landholdings controlled by a handful of families, all closely aligned with the Democrats? What about hundreds of villages controlled by Red units, where all in the village have to conform or be outlawed. this is far worse than the Phuket resort being run by Dems and others---example Samui ??? Edited March 1, 2013 by ginjag 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ginjag Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 The Democrats could start with Phuket. Aren't most of the major landholdings controlled by a handful of families, all closely aligned with the Democrats? What about hundreds of villages controlled by Red units, where all in the village have to conform or be outlawed. this is far worse than the Phuket resort being run by Dems and others---example Samui ??? I wanted to edit but it does not allow me, ????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimi007 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 The Democrats could start with Phuket. Aren't most of the major landholdings controlled by a handful of families, all closely aligned with the Democrats? What about hundreds of villages controlled by Red units, where all in the village have to conform or be outlawed. this is far worse than the Phuket resort being run by Dems and others---example Samui ??? I suppose it is in some ways they are. But then again they are not altering land titles for their own profit like some "connected families" here in Phuket... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
waza Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Your forgeting there is an independant candidate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
animatic Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 One can only trust that it won't be sold off to Temasek/Singapore, this time round. But then again, it might work out better for the country that way, in the long-term ? Naw, never happen. They will sell it to China as a sea port route. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GazR Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 What hypocritical tripe coming from those that represent the wealthy families that have held a monopoly grip on Thailand for centuries... more tit for tat BS. How about a truly novel idea, a political party that represents none of the wealthy families and relies simply on people voting for them and not shady sponsors or behind the scenes power brokers? Sorry, stupid suggestion, clearly that would never work in a real democracy... let alone Thailand. I agree! And how about the Thai people being able to vote where they live instead of having to return to their home province to vote? Or doing away with vote buying? Then they should lose their vote in their home province: Fair trade I reckon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rubl Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 So, if I understand the posts here correctly, all here agree not to give power to one family. That seems to include the Shinewatras and their political party Pheu Thai as well. At least those are part of the topic and we wouldn't like to stray, now would we Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justathought Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 There is a lot of anti Thaksin sentiment in Thai visa forums mostly from farangs. Whatever way you look at it, Thaksin has won the past four elections hands down despite all the barriers and political play the opposite ruling elite has thrown against him. So whenever his sister asks for his advice, remember the Thai people chose her only because the Thai people know he will the back bone. And the Thai people are happy to see him play an active role. No, I am not a Thaksin supporter at all. But I do support democracy and very happy to see it being played out 'Thai style' in Thailand. Yes, 'Thai style' not farang style democracy. Remember TIT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jimi007 Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 What hypocritical tripe coming from those that represent the wealthy families that have held a monopoly grip on Thailand for centuries... more tit for tat BS. How about a truly novel idea, a political party that represents none of the wealthy families and relies simply on people voting for them and not shady sponsors or behind the scenes power brokers? Sorry, stupid suggestion, clearly that would never work in a real democracy... let alone Thailand. I agree! And how about the Thai people being able to vote where they live instead of having to return to their home province to vote? Or doing away with vote buying? Then they should lose their vote in their home province: Fair trade I reckon. Amazing that I can vote here in Thailand for my elections in California, USA by mail, fax or internet. I suppose if they tried that here it would be corrupted in some way, unfortunately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hellodolly Posted March 1, 2013 Share Posted March 1, 2013 Never believe anyone in politics, its part of their training and upbringing to tell un-truths or in other words lies and in my 30 years of business I have learnt to never trust a liar. Not sure what lie you are referring to. I personally agree that a PT win will put all of Thailand in the hands of one family. A good point that should have been worked on long ago. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post hellodolly Posted March 1, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2013 There is a lot of anti Thaksin sentiment in Thai visa forums mostly from farangs. Whatever way you look at it, Thaksin has won the past four elections hands down despite all the barriers and political play the opposite ruling elite has thrown against him. So whenever his sister asks for his advice, remember the Thai people chose her only because the Thai people know he will the back bone. And the Thai people are happy to see him play an active role. No, I am not a Thaksin supporter at all. But I do support democracy and very happy to see it being played out 'Thai style' in Thailand. Yes, 'Thai style' not farang style democracy. Remember TIT. I just had a thought. Are you an alias for rich teacher? Democracy Thai style. Care to explain that to us less enlightened. Is there an upper limit on the bribes to buy votes? Or is there only certain areas you are allowed to buy them in? Don't know where you come from but where I come Democracy does not include vote buying. Vote buying is not democracy. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post rubl Posted March 1, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted March 1, 2013 There is a lot of anti Thaksin sentiment in Thai visa forums mostly from farangs. Whatever way you look at it, Thaksin has won the past four elections hands down despite all the barriers and political play the opposite ruling elite has thrown against him. So whenever his sister asks for his advice, remember the Thai people chose her only because the Thai people know he will the back bone. And the Thai people are happy to see him play an active role. No, I am not a Thaksin supporter at all. But I do support democracy and very happy to see it being played out 'Thai style' in Thailand. Yes, 'Thai style' not farang style democracy. Remember TIT. First of all let me welcome you here on this forum , dear new member. From your remark I assume you've been following the forum for a while before decide to participate. Many do so, it seems some replies can be scary and take a while to get used to. BTW I'm also not a Thaksin supporter, and maybe therefor I know he didn't win the last four (general) elections. He is not even allowed to participate as convicted criminal and fugitive. Another thing you seem to have missed is the Thaksin interview on skyping to order the real PM to run the country. Thai style, in a democratic way as 'we, the red-shirts' have fought for and some even died for. What was the expression again, oh yeah, 'unelected elite', as in Amply Rich people. IMHO of course Hope to seem more of your posts, keep it up 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now