webfact Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Tourists in Bangkok may be better off not to leave hotels during upcoming protestsBANGKOK: -- Air travelers to Bangkok have been warned to expect heavy road traffic and a lack of taxis resulting from the political protests in Bangkok, Suvarnabhumi Airport officials said on Sunday. The airport train, Skytrain or pre arranged transportation may be the best option.This is in anticipation of major political protests in Bangkok.The leaders of the three main anti-government protest groups on Saturday joined forces, vowing to fight shoulder-to-shoulder to uproot former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra's political networks.It was the first time the protest leaders have appeared on the same stage together, despite their three rally sites being situated in close proximity.In the past no tourists had ever been hurt in demonstrations in Bangkok, but transportation will be a challenge and many tourism sites, shopping malls and other attractions may close.Hotels in downtown Bangkok have experience dealing with such security threats and visitors in Bangkok may select to enjoy to stay at their hotels.On Saturday the situation for tourists in Bangkok was ok.Full story: http://www.eturbonews.com/39971/tourists-bangkok-may-be-better-not-leave-hotels-during-upcoming- -- eTN 2013-11-25 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post PaullyW Posted November 25, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 25, 2013 In the past no tourists had ever been hurt in demonstrations in Bangkok, but transportation will be a challenge and many tourism sites, shopping malls and other attractions may close. Um, except for the ones killed during the last major protests. 11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Local Drunk Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 (edited) In the past no tourists had ever been hurt in demonstrations in Bangkok, but transportation will be a challenge and many tourism sites, shopping malls and other attractions may close. Um, except for the ones killed during the last major protests. I think it reads as "foreign tourists". I'm not aware of any foreign tourists being killed in the last protest, but perhaps I should ask what you mean when you say the "last major protest"? Edited November 25, 2013 by Local Drunk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mario2008 Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 In the past no tourists had ever been hurt in demonstrations in Bangkok, but transportation will be a challenge and many tourism sites, shopping malls and other attractions may close. Um, except for the ones killed during the last major protests. I am not sure what you are reffering to. As far as I know no tourist was killed then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post FarangTalk Posted November 25, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 25, 2013 I thought this wouldn't affect tourism? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaullyW Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 I think it reads as "foreign tourists". I'm not aware of any foreign tourists being killed in the last protest, but perhaps I should ask what you mean when you say the "last major protest"? 2010 Thai political protests On the evening of 22 April, around 8 pm local time,[80] a series of explosions caused by Red-Shirts in Bangkok killed one person and injured 86 more, including at least four foreigners.[84][85] and the threat of targeted violence on foreigners On 16 May, the death-toll rose to 33, with the number of wounded rising to 230. Reporters in the vicinity of the violence had to cancel live broadcasts due to the threat of sniper attacks from military forces in the area. The government urged the very young and very old to leave the camp by Monday afternoon, prompting fears of an army crackdown. They also started telling the public that the foreign media, such as CNN, BBC, Reuters, and many others, cannot be trusted as they are biased.[114] 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
feest monty Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 reporters dont count as tourists. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Chao Lao Beach Posted November 25, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 25, 2013 I am just waiting for the TAT to spin this as adventure tourism and numbers have risen again. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaullyW Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 reporters dont count as tourists. Far as I understand, aside from foreign diplomats, all people who are not Thai citizens and to a lesser degree permanent residents are actually and effectively (in the later case) tourists. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post PaullyW Posted November 25, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 25, 2013 Anyway, it doesn't matter. Foreign tourists were in fact killed during the 2010 protests. And, places of foreigner gathering were targeted also - BTS, Dusit Thani hotel. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FarangTalk Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 I am just waiting for the TAT to spin this as adventure tourism and numbers have risen again. It is what the Abhisit administration did after the 2010 Red Shirt protests. Tourism records were broken that year, apparently. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfalfa19 Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 "Hotels in downtown Bangkok have experience dealing with such security threats" This part is laughable. I was there in 2010, staying just a couple of blocks from the main protest site. I could hear rifle shots and explosions many times. The hotel had a lone security guy, if the mob had migrated our way, he would have been screwed, all they had to do was break in the large glass panels on the hotel front. He would have been helpless, and so would the guests. The final night I was there, we had a curfew, and nobody could even leave the hotel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaullyW Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 (edited) "Hotels in downtown Bangkok have experience dealing with such security threats" This part is laughable. I was there in 2010, staying just a couple of blocks from the main protest site. I could hear rifle shots and explosions many times. The hotel had a lone security guy, if the mob had migrated our way, he would have been screwed, all they had to do was break in the large glass panels on the hotel front. He would have been helpless, and so would the guests. The final night I was there, we had a curfew, and nobody could even leave the hotel. And given the Thai propensity to run away from conflict and shirk responsibility/duty, who among us would believe a lowly, minimum wage, lone security guard would actually put himself in harm's way under such a threat? Absolute joke, as usual, in the mystery of the Thai mind. Edited November 25, 2013 by PaullyW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhizBang Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Cue TAT and their pronouncement... "The protests will not effect tourist arrivals". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gabruce Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 In the past no tourists had ever been hurt in demonstrations in Bangkok, but transportation will be a challenge and many tourism sites, shopping malls and other attractions may close. Um, except for the ones killed during the last major protests. As someone else noted, it depends on your definition of tourist. If it includes any foreigner, then you are correct. If you exclude journalist's then I believe you are wrong. If violence occurs, such as in 2010, being near the violence is dangerous. If bullets are in the air, bombs going off, tear gas being shot - none of them have any sort of magic that allows them to bypass foreigners - the laws of physics dictate where they go. So due care is a good idea. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post BDG Posted November 25, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 25, 2013 I was in a major demonstration, early nineties, against the military coup at the time. They shot a tourist a few hundred meters away from us; he was killed instantly. I came across burned police posts and no taxi (so no escape) was available, as the military had instantly seized all petrol stations. People talked about death squads and the school i was attending at that moment decided to continue to teach but in private only, so the school building was closed. It had turned all of a sudden to this, in a few days time.The BKK Post published a front cover entirely in black. It was scary. I walked all the way from Rachada to Bangna - there was suddenly no more transport. The military were everywhere instantly. They weren't soldiers from the city i was told, but from upcountry. The reason for this was that it would be easier for them to fight and kill as they were not emotionally attached to BKK. I believe many people died at the time. So better be safe. It can change quickly. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JeremyBowskill Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Come to Bangkok enjoy looking at your hotel room and some of the worlds cr@pest TV. Alternatively, go somewhere else on holiday where people are not shooting each other over the color or their shirts. HHHHUUMMMM difficult choice to make..... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post yourauntbob Posted November 25, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 25, 2013 I think it reads as "foreign tourists". I'm not aware of any foreign tourists being killed in the last protest, but perhaps I should ask what you mean when you say the "last major protest"? 2010 Thai political protests On the evening of 22 April, around 8 pm local time,[80] a series of explosions caused by Red-Shirts in Bangkok killed one person and injured 86 more, including at least four foreigners.[84][85] and the threat of targeted violence on foreigners On 16 May, the death-toll rose to 33, with the number of wounded rising to 230. Reporters in the vicinity of the violence had to cancel live broadcasts due to the threat of sniper attacks from military forces in the area. The government urged the very young and very old to leave the camp by Monday afternoon, prompting fears of an army crackdown. They also started telling the public that the foreign media, such as CNN, BBC, Reuters, and many others, cannot be trusted as they are biased.[114] perfect example on why you cant trust wiki. anyone can write anything on there and people think of it like the gospel. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Emdog Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 I think the headline advice could possibly apply year round: for safety, don't leave your hotel. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeThePoster Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Hotels in downtown Bangkok have experience dealing with such security threats and visitors in Bangkok may select to enjoy to stay at their hotels. Nothing gets past the mirror under the car check. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lemoncake Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Let's hope it ends this week or high season may turn to be a low one, with some serious consequences for many businesses Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SOTIRIOS Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 ...is this for today...or all week....??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Local Drunk Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 I'd feel safer being at a rally in Bangkok than being on Walking Street in Pattaya... 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PaullyW Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 2010 Thai political protests On the evening of 22 April, around 8 pm local time,[80] a series of explosions caused by Red-Shirts in Bangkok killed one person and injured 86 more, including at least four foreigners.[84][85] and the threat of targeted violence on foreigners On 16 May, the death-toll rose to 33, with the number of wounded rising to 230. Reporters in the vicinity of the violence had to cancel live broadcasts due to the threat of sniper attacks from military forces in the area. The government urged the very young and very old to leave the camp by Monday afternoon, prompting fears of an army crackdown. They also started telling the public that the foreign media, such as CNN, BBC, Reuters, and many others, cannot be trusted as they are biased.[114] perfect example on why you cant trust wiki. anyone can write anything on there and people think of it like the gospel. What about the cites below, from which the information was taken? 80. Thomas Fuller (22 April 2010). "Explosions in Bangkok Wound Dozens". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 25 April 2010. 84. "Grenade attacks rattle Thailand's capital in anti-government protests". Dallas Morning News. Los Angeles Times; The Associated Press. 23 April 2010. Archived from the original on 26 April 2010. 85. "Bangkok grenade blasts kill 3, deputy PM says".National Post (Canada). Agence France-Presse. 22 April 2010. Retrieved 22 April 2010.[dead link] 114. Asthana, Anushka; Sherman, Jill (17 May 2010). "Violence reduces central Bangkok to a 21stcentury Sarajevo". The Times (London). Archived from the original on 17 May 2010. Retrieved 21 May 2010. Perfect example of why you should read critically and in depth and follow citations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post upena Posted November 25, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 25, 2013 No warnings or advisories from American Embassy. Ambassador too busy uploading videos to YouTube on how to make turkey stuffing. 8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rucus7 Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 I thought this wouldn't affect tourism? It's not affecting any tourist in Thailand currently. Who knows what tomorrow may bring? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NCFC Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 Hotels in downtown Bangkok have experience dealing with such security threats and visitors in Bangkok may select to enjoy to stay at their hotels. Nothing gets past the mirror under the car check. You're right. I always carry my bombs on the back seat. They never look there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdinasia Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 reporters dont count as tourists. Far as I understand, aside from foreign diplomats, all people who are not Thai citizens and to a lesser degree permanent residents are actually and effectively (in the later case) tourists. Your understanding is severely lacking. Those of us here on non-immigrant visas are not tourists. That includes reporters, educators, those married to Thais and on non-imm visas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post PaullyW Posted November 25, 2013 Popular Post Share Posted November 25, 2013 (edited) reporters dont count as tourists. Far as I understand, aside from foreign diplomats, all people who are not Thai citizens and to a lesser degree permanent residents are actually and effectively (in the later case) tourists. Your understanding is severely lacking. Those of us here on non-immigrant visas are not tourists. That includes reporters, educators, those married to Thais and on non-imm visas. I am on a non-immigrant visa and I am effectively treated as tourist by the government and businesses alike. Must you renew every year, report every 90 days? Do you still pay far more for many products and services than do Thai citizens? Are you afforded ANY significant rights beyond a tourist for the visa statuses you mentioned? I suspect it is not me who is severely lacking in understanding. You are effectively still regarded as a tourist. A long-term tourist, but nonetheless. Edited November 25, 2013 by PaullyW 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tomtomtom69 Posted November 25, 2013 Share Posted November 25, 2013 I was in a major demonstration, early nineties, against the military coup at the time. They shot a tourist a few hundred meters away from us; he was killed instantly. I came across burned police posts and no taxi (so no escape) was available, as the military had instantly seized all petrol stations. People talked about death squads and the school i was attending at that moment decided to continue to teach but in private only, so the school building was closed. It had turned all of a sudden to this, in a few days time.The BKK Post published a front cover entirely in black. It was scary. I walked all the way from Rachada to Bangna - there was suddenly no more transport. The military were everywhere instantly. They weren't soldiers from the city i was told, but from upcountry. The reason for this was that it would be easier for them to fight and kill as they were not emotionally attached to BKK. I believe many people died at the time. So better be safe. It can change quickly. Maybe it's not such a bad thing to live on the outskirts of Bangkok and commute 40km into town. The protesters won't ever come out to where I live. Only thing is I wouldn't want to walk 40km to get back home if I can't get my car out of the Central World parking lot or the skytrain doesn't run! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now