The new extension rules for people studying

[Mario2008 3,563]

For extensions based on education a distiction is now being made between "general educational institutions" and "non-formal schools".

general educational institutions

general educational institutions are basically regular schools such as elementary schools, secondary schools and universities. For students at these facilities nothing has changed and they still get their 1 year extension of stay as usual with the normal proof.

non-formal schools

non-formal schools are:

• Religious school: a school established by sole purpose of teaching religion
• Art and Sports school: a school established to provide education of music, art and sports
• Vocational school: a school established to provide vocational skills to be applied to further carrier or as an additional skill for learners
• Tutoring school: a school established to provide additional knowledge parrarel to the general education curriculum
• Skill Development school: established to develop talents, ideas and other skills of learners

I believe tutoring schools fall under non-formal schools.

For non-formal schools there are significant changes. While studying at a general education institution continues to give extensions of stay for up to 1 year at a time, a study at a non-formal school is now limited. They can now only get an extension of stay for 90 days maximum at a time and the duration of the stay based on the study cannot be longer than 1 year from date of entry into Thailand. For most non-formal schools the 90 day extension is of course nothing new,, but some immigration offices tended to give longer extensions than 90 days to these students. That is now no longer possible.

A big change is that you are only allowed to study up to 1 year from date of entry into Thailand. That means that after 1 year you have to leave the country and maybe apply for a new ED-visa.

Another big change, not in the new extension rules from immigration, is that the study requirements will be raised from a minimum of 4 hours a week to a minimum of 8 hours a week. Students are expected to attend school 4 days a week for 2 hours, it remains to be seen if going to school for 2 days a week for 4 hours will be acceptable.

This is at least the case in Bangkok and might be soon the case in other provinces also. (Bangkok immigration tends to follow national policy).

A consequences of the 8 hour requirement will be that a course that is currently approved as a 3 year course will now only have a value for 18 months. Another aspect is that the tuition fees now will have to be raised because of the extra teaching and the prices for a course will go up.

Again, this last is now only for Bangkok but will possibly soon be for the whole country.

[alocacoc 2,538]

Thanks for this clarification. Probably it will help many.

What if a student do vacation to his country for several weeks?

Edited August 11, 2014 by alocacoc

[Mario2008 3,563]

Thanks for this clarification. Probably it will help many.

What if a student do vacation to his country for several weeks?

That is possible, provided one is back on time for the extension of stay and doesn't stay away too long as not studying very much.

It can of course also be necessary for the study to travel 9often). That is something one can explain.

[KhunBENQ 13,082]

Language schools (learning Thai e.g.) fall under non-formal schools I guess?

[ColdSingha 1,033]

that elite card is gonna look a whole lot more attractive now..

tuition 60,000

edvisa + travel 5000

extensions x 3 5700

travel 50 x 4 x 50 weeks 10000

total 80,700

plus of course 8 x 50 weeks tuition = 400 hours of your life

ouch

[Mario2008 3,563]

Language schools (learning Thai e.g.) fall under non-formal schools I guess?

I believe so.

[Suttisan 349]

Looks like options are running out for many foreigners wanting to stay here, surely a yearly Thai test would be sufficient to assess a student's level of progression, it seems that even if they were to do things the proper way at the end they wouldn't even be able to stay in the country to use their language skills they've learned anyway, thus making it all rather pointless. I'd never jump through these hoops myself, if I wasn't employed here legally I'd just go somewhere else, coming here for 3 months a year as a tourist is a nice enough option IMO.

[paz 2,317]

that elite card is gonna look a whole lot more attractive now..

tuition 60,000

edvisa + travel 5000

extensions x 3 5700

travel 50 x 4 x 50 weeks 10000

total 80,700

plus of course 8 x 50 weeks tuition = 400 hours of your life

Let's see first how the private education industry and the regulations adapt to each other, over time.

My thinking is that there will be an increase of cost and inconvenience for staying in Thailand, but not a dramatic one. And that if and when the industry will be able to self regulate, more options will become possible, e.g. reliable attendance/proficiency cards, advanced course program to setend study duration over multiple years, reintroduction of yearly extensions, etc.

It is a job for the industry to become credible to the government, with a national associations, quality and ethical standards, best business practices, etc. Of course if Thailand is OK with having schools that are run they way many are run now, no progress will ever be made.

[ldnguy 849]

Looks like options are running out for many foreigners wanting to stay here, surely a yearly Thai test would be sufficient to assess a student's level of progression, it seems that even if they were to do things the proper way at the end they wouldn't even be able to stay in the country to use their language skills they've learned anyway, thus making it all rather pointless. I'd never jump through these hoops myself, if I wasn't employed here legally I'd just go somewhere else, coming here for 3 months a year as a tourist is a nice enough option IMO.

Not really pointless at all. They could still come back on holiday every year and use the Thai they learnt. Many English people learn French, German, Spanish, etc and use them when they go on holiday. They don't think it's a waste of time just because they don't live in France, Germany, Spain. Learning a language is fun for many people. They don't learn one just to live in a particular place.

ED Visa is not meant to be a way to learn a language so that you can stay in the country. Imagine how many people would go to UK if all they had to do was learn English a few hours a week for the rest of their lives.

You think it's to much hassle to use to just stay in the country, but that is the whole point. They want genuine language learners, nit people learning it just as a way to stay here. So they have succeeded if you and others are put off.

Edited August 11, 2014 by ldnguy

[ColdSingha 1,033]

that elite card is gonna look a whole lot more attractive now..

tuition 60,000

edvisa + travel 5000

extensions x 3 5700

travel 50 x 4 x 50 weeks 10000

total 80,700

plus of course 8 x 50 weeks tuition = 400 hours of your life

Let's see first how the private education industry and the regulations adapt to each other, over time.

My thinking is that there will be an increase of cost and inconvenience for staying in Thailand, but not a dramatic one. And that if and when the industry will be able to self regulate, more options will become possible, e.g. reliable attendance/proficiency cards, advanced course program to setend study duration over multiple years, reintroduction of yearly extensions, etc.

It is a job for the industry to become credible to the government, with a national associations, quality and ethical standards, best business practices, etc. Of course if Thailand is OK with having schools that are run they way many are run now, no progress will ever be made.

agree with everything you say, especially the last line

short term though inconvenience just doubled, the market will set price

[falang07 461]

I would say this is not going to work and most of it is just rumours.

[falang07 461]

"That means that after 1 year you have to leave the country and maybe apply for a new ED-visa."

Maybe? So is this a new rule, or just some maybe? Please clarify.

[nicolas18 389]

"That means that after 1 year you have to leave the country and maybe apply for a new ED-visa."

Maybe? So is this a new rule, or just some maybe? Please clarify.

No, he means, that if you want to, you can apply for a new ED visa. Or you can go home. Or get married. Or move to Japan. Or whatever.

[Suttisan 349]

Looks like options are running out for many foreigners wanting to stay here, surely a yearly Thai test would be sufficient to assess a student's level of progression, it seems that even if they were to do things the proper way at the end they wouldn't even be able to stay in the country to use their language skills they've learned anyway, thus making it all rather pointless. I'd never jump through these hoops myself, if I wasn't employed here legally I'd just go somewhere else, coming here for 3 months a year as a tourist is a nice enough option IMO.

Not really pointless at all. They could still come back on holiday every year and use the Thai they learnt. Many English people learn French, German, Spanish, etc and use them when they go on holiday. They don't think it's a waste of time just because they don't live in France, Germany, Spain. Learning a language is fun for many people. They don't learn one just to live in a particular place.

ED Visa is not meant to be a way to learn a language so that you can stay in the country. Imagine how many people would go to UK if all they had to do was learn English a few hours a week for the rest of their lives.

You think it's to much hassle to use to just stay in the country, but that is the whole point. They want genuine language learners, nit people learning it just as a way to stay here. So they have succeeded if you and others are put off.

Good points, it makes no difference to me as I work here legally and pay tax. Although I imagine a good percentage are mainly interested in the visa, not really the language skills, was certainly the case at the language centre I used to study at.

Edited August 11, 2014 by Suttisan

[ColdSingha 1,033]

@Mario

if you don't mind please, what is the source of these new rules and also why is there no official statement from immigration especially considering new police orders were released only a few days ago?