Jump to content

Baby hurt as car ploughs into Phuket clothing store


Recommended Posts

^ I agree the assumptions are remarkable but I don't see where it says in the article where the baby was.

Another source, a blog has it a 5 year old child.

We really should have a comparison thread where the three main sources are held to what they print. Who would get it right and who would get it wrong most of the time ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

^ I agree the assumptions are remarkable but I don't see where it says in the article where the baby was.

Another source, a blog has it a 5 year old child.

We really should have a comparison thread where the three main sources are held to what they print. Who would get it right and who would get it wrong most of the time ?

The origiinal news source has updated the article. If you would have read that before you posted you would have had that information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

^ I agree the assumptions are remarkable but I don't see where it says in the article where the baby was.

Another source, a blog has it a 5 year old child.

We really should have a comparison thread where the three main sources are held to what they print. Who would get it right and who would get it wrong most of the time ?

The origiinal news source has updated the article. If you would have read that before you posted you would have had that information.

However as I hadn't read it, and isn't posted on the thread, I'm posting my comment based on the article that is in thread and had the assumptions made about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

^ I agree the assumptions are remarkable but I don't see where it says in the article where the baby was.

Another source, a blog has it a 5 year old child.

We really should have a comparison thread where the three main sources are held to what they print. Who would get it right and who would get it wrong most of the time ?

The origiinal news source has updated the article. If you would have read that before you posted you would have had that information.

However as I hadn't read it, and isn't posted on the thread, I'm posting my comment based on the article that is in thread and had the assumptions made about it.

So you're posting based on old information, and since you read the thread as well you know the information you're posting is based on is outdated. But I guess this information suits you better than the correct, up to date information.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...