Suspected arsonist of Tesco Lotus released on the quiet - flies to Chiang Mai to enter monkhood

[metisdead]

An offensive post has been removed. 

[spidermike007]

2 hours ago, louse1953 said:

Your last paragraph is based on what,<deleted>.You have slurred and defamed a man and his parents.Pretty safe hiding behind a keyboard.I suggest you put up or shut up.

 

 

Oh my. I have slurred and defamed a man who burned down a Tesco supermarket, while participating in a coordinated, concerted attempt to bring chaos to the country. Wow. I feel REALLY bad about that. And on top of that, I have defamed his slug parents, who raised this worm, and no doubt helped him buy his way out of jail, and avoid any punishment for his crime. How am I going to be able to live with myself?

[edwinchester]

18 hours ago, Eric Loh said:

He should sue the government for wrongful arrest and detention. 

Doubt if he would get far going down that road but the fact he's been released and had his airfare paid for speaks volumes about lack of evidence. Does anyone seriously believe the military would be letting anyone go if they had even minimal connection with the bombings?

[spidermike007]

4 hours ago, edwinchester said:

Doubt if he would get far going down that road but the fact he's been released and had his airfare paid for speaks volumes about lack of evidence. Does anyone seriously believe the military would be letting anyone go if they had even minimal connection with the bombings?

 

 

Yes. If they came from the right family, had enough cash or influence, or were well connected. Yes. 

[gemguy]

Another example of illogical behavior.

Remember when you first came to Thailand and you probably said, like everyone else: I love Thai people

 

All theses many years later and knowing what you know : What do you think now?....lol

 

Just asking

 

Cheers

[chrisinth]

22 hours ago, boomerangutang said:

If I was head monk at the wat, I wouldn't have accepted him.   In Zen Buddhist tradition, monks are encouraged to leave, to test their mettle in wanting to stay.  In Thai Buddhist tradition, they'll accept any dregs that get sucked in the gate.

 

There are a lot of people thinking that this guy's 7 days entering the monkhood is related to the accusation, false accusation as it would appear, that he was guilty of arson.

 

Has the reason been given? I would find it extremely strange that it would be for his good luck getting away with arson.

[JayBeeee]

On 08/21/2016 at 11:35 AM, spidermike007 said:

 

 

Oh my. I have slurred and defamed a man who burned down a Tesco supermarket, while participating in a coordinated, concerted attempt to bring chaos to the country. Wow. I feel REALLY bad about that. And on top of that, I have defamed his slug parents, who raised this worm, and no doubt helped him buy his way out of jail, and avoid any punishment for his crime. How am I going to be able to live with myself?

 

I've clearly missed sometning!

What evidence is there to support the charges you make?

I think there are many TVF expert contributors whe can think themselves lucky that suing for slander and character defamation hasn't yet caught on in Thailand.

Now, there's an idea!

 

[Torrens54]

On 8/21/2016 at 9:28 AM, louse1953 said:

What a pathetic comment.

Yes, thought I'd emulate yours.

[spidermike007]

7 hours ago, JayBeeee said:

 

I've clearly missed sometning!

What evidence is there to support the charges you make?

I think there are many TVF expert contributors whe can think themselves lucky that suing for slander and character defamation hasn't yet caught on in Thailand.

Now, there's an idea!

 

 

 

I have empirical evidence. He was brought down to the police station, and then escorted to the airport by the police. That is all the evidence one needs to get a conviction of guilt! What else do you think went on? What on earth makes you think there is even the possibility of innocence under those circumstances? As far as slander and defamation of character laws, that was created in within a broken system, to protect the guilty with wealth, and does not allow the guilty to be brought to the court of public justice. Let us defy that. Let us call them out. 

[JayBeeee]

2 hours ago, spidermike007 said:

 

 

I have empirical evidence. He was brought down to the police station, and then escorted to the airport by the police. That is all the evidence one needs to get a conviction of guilt! What else do you think went on? What on earth makes you think there is even the possibility of innocence under those circumstances?

 

Hardly "empirical evidence". What you present is merely biased suspicion. Perhaps you should present your "evidence" to Prayutin on the public stage in an attempt too "call them out".

[spidermike007]

On August 23, 2016 at 10:44 AM, JayBeeee said:

 

Hardly "empirical evidence". What you present is merely biased suspicion. Perhaps you should present your "evidence" to Prayutin on the public stage in an attempt too "call them out".

 

 

You mean subject myself to five years in prison? That would not be a particularly smart decision. Since the little man does not allow dissent, disagreeing with him on a public stage can be quite harmful to one's health and well being. Remember the lack of public debate leading up to the heinous new charter? Remember what happened to the few reporters, who openly questioned the intent, or aspect of the charter? 

 

Or perhaps you just like seeing people you do not agree with go to prison? Let me ask you one simple question. What percentage of the time do you think a suspect, who is brought in for questioning, is personally escorted to the airport by a police officer?